Shadomy S, Carver M
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):228-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.2.228.
The reliability of the standardized 30-mug cephalothin disk and that of an experimental 30-mug cefaclor disk in predicting probable clinical susceptibility to cefaclor were compared. Quantitative determinations of cefaclor susceptibility were measured by the World Health Organization International Collaborative Study agar dilution procedure; diffusion disk tests were performed by the standardized U.S. Food and Drug Administration disk test. The cephalothin disk erred in predicting probable susceptibility in 52% of isolates of Enterococcus spp. resistant to 16 mug or less of cefaclor per ml; the cefaclor disk did not. The cephalothin disk erred in correctly predicting susceptibility in only 20% of cefaclor-susceptible isolates of Enterobacter spp.; the cefaclor disk correctly predicted susceptibility for 70%. These results indicate the need for further evaluation of a separate cefaclor disk for use in susceptibility testing with this new cephalosporin.
比较了标准化的30μg头孢噻吩纸片和实验性的30μg头孢克洛纸片在预测对头孢克洛可能的临床敏感性方面的可靠性。采用世界卫生组织国际协作研究琼脂稀释法进行头孢克洛敏感性的定量测定;扩散纸片试验按照美国食品药品管理局的标准化纸片试验方法进行。对于每毫升对16μg或更低浓度头孢克洛耐药的肠球菌属菌株,头孢噻吩纸片在预测可能的敏感性时出现52%的错误;而头孢克洛纸片没有出现这种情况。对于头孢克洛敏感的肠杆菌属菌株,头孢噻吩纸片在正确预测敏感性方面仅出现20%的错误;头孢克洛纸片正确预测敏感性的比例为70%。这些结果表明,需要进一步评估单独的头孢克洛纸片用于这种新型头孢菌素的敏感性试验。