Amos H E
Int J Immunopharmacol. 1979;1(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/0192-0561(79)90025-0.
It is unfortunate that there is conflicting immunological data relating to the practolol syndrome. It has not been established if "practolol patients" have some altered T cell function. The work of Behan et al. (1976) strongly supports this interpretation but other groups have not come to the same conclusion. The role of the antibody specific for a practolol metabolite needs to be determined. In practice this is going to be very difficult to do; the drug is no longer used and patients, for obvious reaons, are unwilling to take part in clinical experiments. It is likely that the nature of the metabolite will eventiually be defined and it would be a significant step forward if it could be shown that the antigenic determinant was not formed by other structurally related beta-blocking drugs. Meanwhile the stimulus to further research must be to produce an animal model system, but, for various political and economic reasons, support for such a research effort is difficult to justify.
遗憾的是,关于心得宁综合征存在相互矛盾的免疫学数据。“心得宁患者”的T细胞功能是否发生了改变尚未确定。贝汉等人(1976年)的研究有力地支持了这一解释,但其他研究小组并未得出相同结论。针对心得宁代谢物的特异性抗体的作用需要确定。实际上,这将非常难以做到;该药物已不再使用,而且出于明显原因,患者不愿参与临床试验。代谢物的性质最终可能会被确定,如果能够证明抗原决定簇不是由其他结构相关的β受体阻滞剂形成的,那将是向前迈出的重要一步。与此同时,进一步研究的动力必须是建立一个动物模型系统,但是,由于各种政治和经济原因,为这样的研究工作提供支持很难说得过去。