Amery Aiya, Marritt Kayla, Baig Zarrukh, Roy Haven, Gill Dilip, Ginther Nathan
Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 24;12:1492690. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1492690. eCollection 2025.
The optimal approach for the surgical management of rectal prolapse is individualized based on anatomical, functional, and surgical factors. In patients with significant comorbidities, perineal approaches are often preferred even though they are associated with higher recurrence rates compared to an abdominal approach. Although anal encirclement was one of the first procedures described for this condition, it is seldom employed given its high recurrence rates. There is currently a lack of data addressing a combination surgery, wherein both a perineal proctosigmoidectomy and anal encirclement are performed simultaneously.
To evaluate the efficacy of combining perineal proctosigmoidectomy with anal encirclement using Nylon sutures compared to perineal proctosigmoidectomy alone.
This was a single institution, non-randomized, retrospective study conducted at the Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (July 2017 to October 2022). Patients over the age of 18 with full-thickness rectal prolapse who underwent either perineal proctosigmoidectomy alone or perineal proctosigmoidectomy with anal encirclement were included. There were 23 patients in the perineal proctosigmoidectomy group and 21 patients in the perineal proctosigmoidectomy with anal encirclement group. The primary outcome was prolapse recurrence. Secondary outcomes included operative time, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications.
Patients who received perineal proctosigmoidectomy with anal encirclement had significantly lower rates of recurrent prolapse (9.5%) compared to perineal proctosigmoidectomy alone (34.8%) ( = 0.02). Patients who underwent the combined procedure had a shorter length of stay by 2.3 days ( = 0.03). There was no difference in post-operative complications or operating time.
Routine anal encirclement in perineal proctosigmoidectomy reduces recurrence rates and length of stay without increasing operating time or complications.
直肠脱垂手术治疗的最佳方法需根据解剖、功能和手术因素进行个体化选择。对于有严重合并症的患者,尽管与腹部手术相比,会阴手术复发率较高,但通常更受青睐。虽然肛门环扎术是最早描述用于治疗这种疾病的手术之一,但由于其高复发率,很少被采用。目前缺乏关于联合手术的数据,即同时进行会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术和肛门环扎术。
评估与单纯会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术相比,使用尼龙缝线联合会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术和肛门环扎术的疗效。
这是一项在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省萨斯卡通市皇家大学医院进行的单机构、非随机、回顾性研究(2017年7月至2022年10月)。纳入年龄超过18岁、患有全层直肠脱垂且接受单纯会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术或会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术联合肛门环扎术的患者。会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术组有23例患者,会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术联合肛门环扎术组有21例患者。主要结局是脱垂复发。次要结局包括手术时间、住院时间和术后并发症。
与单纯会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术(34.8%)相比,接受会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术联合肛门环扎术的患者复发率显著降低(9.5%)(P = 0.02)。接受联合手术的患者住院时间缩短2.3天(P = 0.03)。术后并发症或手术时间无差异。
会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术中常规进行肛门环扎术可降低复发率和缩短住院时间,且不增加手术时间或并发症。