• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同修复材料微渗漏与抗压强度的比较评估——一项研究

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage and Compressive Strength of Different Restorative Materials - An Study.

作者信息

Khuva Hetal, Kurup Deepak, Mahreen Shazia, Mukherjee Trina, Tikadar Sourav

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Jharkhand, India.

Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Jharkhand, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3818-S3820. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1174_24. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1174_24
PMID:39926727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11805272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For dental restorations to be successful in clinical practice, they must possess excellent mechanical properties, such as high compressive strength and microleakage resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 80 Class V cavities were prepared from extracted human teeth, divided into four groups of 20 (Groups A, B, C, and D). One of the following restorative materials Neo-Spectra ST, Activa Bioactive Material, SDR Bulkfill Flowable Composite, or Zirconomer was used to restore each group. Standardized testing procedures were used to evaluate compressive strength, and dye penetration techniques were used to measure microleakage. ANOVA and Tukey's test, were two of the statistical procedures used to compare the performance of the various materials.

RESULTS

Neo Spectra ST had the lowest average microleakage score of 0.5 mm, which was significantly lower compared to Activa Bioactive Material at 1.2 mm, SDR Bulkfill Flowable Composite at 0.8 mm, and Zirconomer at 1.5 mm. In terms of compressive strength, Neo Spectra ST showed the highest average value at 120 MPa, with SDR Bulkfill Flowable Composite following at 100 MPa, Activa Bioactive Material at 80 MPa, and Zirconomer at 60 MPa. Statistical analysis showed significant variations in both microleakage and compressive strength between the materials ( < 0.05), highlighting Neo Spectra ST's excellent performance.

CONCLUSION

Amongst all materials, Neo Spectra ST demonstrated the greatest compressive strength and microleakage resistance compared to Zirconomer, SDR Bulkfill Flowable Composite, and Activa Bioactive Material.

摘要

背景

为使牙科修复体在临床实践中取得成功,它们必须具备优异的机械性能,如高抗压强度和抗微渗漏性能。

材料与方法

从拔除的人类牙齿上制备了总共80个V类洞,分为四组,每组20个(A组、B组、C组和D组)。使用以下修复材料之一Neo-Spectra ST、Activa生物活性材料、SDR大块充填可流动复合树脂或锆瓷聚合物来修复每组。采用标准化测试程序评估抗压强度,并使用染料渗透技术测量微渗漏。方差分析和Tukey检验是用于比较各种材料性能的两种统计程序。

结果

Neo Spectra ST的平均微渗漏评分为0.5毫米,是最低的,与Activa生物活性材料的1.2毫米、SDR大块充填可流动复合树脂的0.8毫米和锆瓷聚合物的1.5毫米相比,显著更低。在抗压强度方面,Neo Spectra ST的平均值最高,为120兆帕,其次是SDR大块充填可流动复合树脂,为100兆帕,Activa生物活性材料为80兆帕,锆瓷聚合物为60兆帕。统计分析表明,材料之间的微渗漏和抗压强度均存在显著差异(<0.05),突出了Neo Spectra ST的优异性能。

结论

在所有材料中,与锆瓷聚合物、SDR大块充填可流动复合树脂和Activa生物活性材料相比,Neo Spectra ST表现出最大的抗压强度和抗微渗漏性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063b/11805272/63ee658304f3/JPBS-16-3818-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063b/11805272/63ee658304f3/JPBS-16-3818-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063b/11805272/63ee658304f3/JPBS-16-3818-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage and Compressive Strength of Different Restorative Materials - An Study.不同修复材料微渗漏与抗压强度的比较评估——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3818-S3820. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1174_24. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Cavities Restored with Newer Bioactive Restorative Materials: Activa Bioactive Restorative and Activa Pronto.新型生物活性修复材料修复Ⅴ类洞微渗漏的比较评估:Activa生物活性修复材料与Activa Pronto
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Nov;17(11):1272-1276. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2958. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
3
A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study.Ketac Molar、聚硅氧烷增强型玻璃离子水门汀、含锆复合体及Ceram-x微渗漏与抗压强度的比较评估:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;34(3):280-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.186746.
4
Effect of protective coating agents on microleakage and flexural strength of glass ionomer cement and zirconomer. an in vitro study.保护涂料对玻璃离子水门汀和氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀微渗漏和弯曲强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;25(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00853-8. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
Comparative Analysis of Microleakage of Zirconia-infused Glass Ionomer Cement with Miracle Mix and Amalgam: An In Vitro Study.含氧化锆玻璃离子水门汀与Miracle Mix及银汞合金微渗漏的比较分析:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2018 Dec 3;10(12):e3672. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3672.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations Using Three Bulk-fill Composites with or without Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement Liner: A Stereomicroscopic Study.使用三种大块填料复合树脂加或不加树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀衬层的II类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的比较评价:一项体视显微镜研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Oct;17(10):1146-1152. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2957.
7
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Various Bulk-fill Bioactive Dentin substitutes: An in vitro Study.不同大块充填生物活性牙本质替代材料的剪切粘结强度和微渗漏比较:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):997-1002.
8
Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative.生物活性大块充填修复材料的直径拉伸强度、弯曲强度和表面显微硬度
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):13-19. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2205.
9
Comparative Assessment of Microleakage in Various Bulkfill Flowable Composites: An Study.不同大体积可流动复合树脂微渗漏的比较评估:一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3976-S3978. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1548_24. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
10
Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.可流动复合树脂、复合体和玻璃离子水门汀的牙本质粘结强度及微渗漏
Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):325-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00074.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.Cention-N、复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的力学性能和微渗漏性能的比较评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):691-695.
2
A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study.Ketac Molar、聚硅氧烷增强型玻璃离子水门汀、含锆复合体及Ceram-x微渗漏与抗压强度的比较评估:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;34(3):280-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.186746.
3
Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: in vitro study.
四种大块充填牙科复合材料边缘完整性的评估:体外研究
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:701262. doi: 10.1155/2015/701262. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
4
Dental amalgam: An update.牙科汞合金:最新进展。
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Oct;13(4):204-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.73380.
5
Creep as a mechanism for sealing amalgams.蠕变作为汞合金密封的一种机制。
Oper Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr;31(2):161-4. doi: 10.2341/05-18.