Lewis Taylor K, Cariveau Tom
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Apr;58(2):329-343. doi: 10.1002/jaba.70001. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
Early reading materials are replete with pictures. Pictures purportedly improve reading comprehension and motivation; however, the simultaneous presentation of pictures and text can also impede textual control for some readers. Attempts to remediate restricted stimulus control in picture-text compounds suggest that omitting the picture element is most effective, although these arrangements may also be less socially valid. The current study is an evaluation of a novel compound stimulus prompt (CSP) arrangement that required that the learner differentially respond to the underselected (i.e., textual) element during picture-book reading. The development of textual control in this condition was compared with that in text-only and picture prompt arrangements. The CSP condition required the same or fewer sessions to produce textual control as the text-only condition for five out of six participants who exhibited reading difficulties. Participants emitted more correct responses during CSP and picture prompt instruction and preferred these conditions to the text-only condition during a concurrent-chains assessment.
早期阅读材料充满了图片。据说图片能提高阅读理解能力和阅读积极性;然而,图片和文字同时呈现也可能会妨碍一些读者对文本的掌控。针对图文结合材料中受限刺激控制问题的补救措施表明,省略图片元素最为有效,尽管这些安排在社会效度方面可能也较低。本研究评估了一种新颖的复合刺激提示(CSP)安排,该安排要求学习者在绘本阅读过程中对未被充分选择的(即文字)元素做出不同反应。将这种情况下文本掌控能力的发展与纯文字和图片提示安排下的发展进行了比较。对于六名有阅读困难的参与者中的五名,CSP条件与纯文字条件产生文本掌控所需的训练次数相同或更少。在CSP和图片提示教学期间,参与者发出了更多正确反应,并且在并发链评估中更喜欢这些条件而非纯文字条件。