Servent Mathieu, Casey Scott D, Stubblefield William B, Douillet Delphine, Germini Federico, Penaloza Andrea, Kabrhel Christopher, Huisman Menno V, Vinson David R, Roy Pierre-Marie
Department of Emergency Medicine, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Pleasanton, California, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center, Vallejo, California, USA.
J Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jun;23(6):1758-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2025.01.016. Epub 2025 Feb 9.
The safety of home treatment for patients with low-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has been confirmed in several studies; however, these studies have used varying triaging criteria and outcomes, leading to inconsistencies in defining safe discharge parameters. This study aimed to identify adverse outcomes that make home discharge inappropriate, as well as their timeframe and clinical criteria, indicating high risk for such events. Following a systematic literature review, an international expert panel participated in 3 Delphi survey rounds. Experts evaluated each proposal using a Likert scale, and consensus required 75% agreement. Items without consensus were reassessed in subsequent rounds until agreement was achieved. Of the 55 invited experts, 38 from 13 countries participated (69%). Consensus was reached on 6 adverse events for a composite outcome, with a 7-day postdischarge timeframe and a maximum acceptable incidence of 2.0%. The panel defined a triaging rule with 14 clinical criteria as contraindications for home treatment, grouped into 4 categories: hemodynamic (3), respiratory (1), hemorrhagic (7), and medico-social (3). An extended rule, adding 3 optional biological or imaging criteria, was developed to further refine risk assessment. The expert panel established a consensus-based triaging rule for the home treatment of PE patients. This framework defines adverse outcomes, a 7-day safety timeframe, and an acceptable risk threshold for assessing patient safety. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the Emergency Advisory and Research international board on Thrombosis and Hemostasis rule before its implementation in clinical practice.
多项研究已证实低风险急性肺栓塞(PE)患者居家治疗的安全性;然而,这些研究采用了不同的分诊标准和结局指标,导致在定义安全出院参数方面存在不一致。本研究旨在确定导致不适合居家出院的不良结局及其时间框架和临床标准,表明此类事件的高风险。在进行系统的文献综述后,一个国际专家小组参与了三轮德尔菲调查。专家们使用李克特量表对每个提议进行评估,达成共识需要75%的同意率。未达成共识的项目在后续轮次中重新评估,直至达成一致。在受邀的55位专家中,来自13个国家的38位专家参与了调查(69%)。就复合结局的6种不良事件达成了共识,出院后时间框架为7天,最大可接受发生率为2.0%。该小组定义了一项分诊规则,包含14项临床标准作为居家治疗的禁忌证,分为4类:血流动力学(3项)、呼吸(1项)、出血(7项)和医疗社会(3项)。还制定了一项扩展规则,增加了3项可选的生物学或影像学标准,以进一步完善风险评估。专家小组为PE患者的居家治疗建立了基于共识的分诊规则。该框架定义了不良结局、7天的安全时间框架以及用于评估患者安全性的可接受风险阈值。在临床实践中实施之前,需要未来的前瞻性研究来验证国际血栓与止血紧急咨询和研究委员会的规则。