Sakaguchi Masakuni, Maebayashi Toshiya, Sekino Yuta, Ishikawa Hitoshi
Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi Kami-Cho, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
BMC Urol. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01707-9.
In recent years, a chemoradiotherapy has been developed as a radical treatment for stage II-III muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) that can preserve the bladder for patients who cannot tolerate radical cystectomy (RC) or who do not wish to undergo RC. However, most of the studies were conducted on younger patients with MIBC, and it is not clear if it is effective for elderly patients with MIBC. In this study, we reviewed the effects and adverse events after radical radiotherapy in elderly patients with MIBC to determine if radiotherapy has been/can be equally recommended for younger patients with MIBC.
We extracted full research reports in English comparing treatment results between different age groups and reports targeting elderly patients with MIBC. A keyword search of the PubMed database was conducted in the decade ending on December 8, 2021. Studies reporting post-treatment overall survival (OS), relapse-free/progression-free/disease-free survival (RFS/PFS/DFS), disease-specific/cancer-specific survival (DSS/CSS), and complete response (CR) rate, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients with MIBC were searched. Thirty-nine full articles, including those with comparisons by age group or treatments for elderly patients, were retrieved.
OS was significant or tended to be poor in elderly patients. There were no differences in PFS and CSS between younger and elderly patients. No differences in the rates of grade 3 morbidities between younger and elderly patients were also observed.
The lack of a difference in PFS/CSS and toxicities between elderly and younger MIBC patients indicated that curative chemoradiotherapy is effective for not only younger but also elderly patients. With advances in treatment, further prospective studies are needed to optimize the management of MIBC in elderly patients.
近年来,化疗放疗已发展成为II - III期肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的一种根治性治疗方法,对于无法耐受根治性膀胱切除术(RC)或不愿接受RC的患者,该方法可保留膀胱。然而,大多数研究是针对年轻的MIBC患者进行的,目前尚不清楚该方法对老年MIBC患者是否有效。在本研究中,我们回顾了老年MIBC患者根治性放疗后的疗效和不良事件,以确定放疗是否同样适用于年轻的MIBC患者。
我们提取了英文的完整研究报告,这些报告比较了不同年龄组之间的治疗结果以及针对老年MIBC患者的报告。在截至2021年12月8日的十年间,对PubMed数据库进行了关键词搜索。搜索了报告老年MIBC患者治疗后总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期/无进展生存期/无病生存期(RFS/PFS/DFS)、疾病特异性生存期/癌症特异性生存期(DSS/CSS)、完全缓解(CR)率、不良事件(AE)和生活质量(QOL)的研究。检索到39篇完整文章,包括按年龄组进行比较或针对老年患者治疗的文章。
老年患者的OS显著或趋于较差。年轻患者和老年患者在PFS和CSS方面没有差异。年轻患者和老年患者在3级发病率方面也未观察到差异。
老年和年轻MIBC患者在PFS/CSS和毒性方面缺乏差异表明,根治性化疗放疗不仅对年轻患者有效,对老年患者也有效。随着治疗的进展,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来优化老年MIBC患者的管理。