• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌生存者健康活动的障碍和参与度。

Barriers and engagement in breast cancer survivorship wellness activities.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(1):317-325. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06279-4. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-021-06279-4
PMID:34095986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8482782/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Breast cancer survivors may be at risk for increased rates of emotional distress and poorer quality of life. Survivorship care plans (SCPs) promoting wellness activities may support well-being; however, survivors may not receive or engage in their SCPs. This study aimed to assess receipt and participation in SCP activities as well as barriers to engagement amongst breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Breast cancer survivors (n = 187; 99% female, Mean age = 57.7) consented and completed self-reported assessments of SCP recommendations, engagement and interest in wellness activities, and potential barriers to engagement.

RESULTS

A minority of participants recalled receiving an SCP (21%). The most physician recommended (62%) and completed (53%) activity was exercise. Interest in adding other wellness activities to the SCP was high, with reported interest levels of approximately 50% for several activities (e.g., mind body, nutrition, psychotherapy interventions). Fully half reported that having a physician-designed plan would influence participation in activities. The most common reported barriers to SCP activity engagement were lack of time (82%), work/school (65%), and lack of information (65%).

CONCLUSION

Few survivors recalled receiving a formal SCP, and lack of information about wellness activities was a commonly reported barrier to participation. Interest in wellness activities was generally high and may indicate the need for more formal prescription or motivation enhancement techniques to promote SCP engagement. There may be a clinical need to emphasize SCP recommendations to enhance recall and increase engagement in wellness activities that may reduce psychological distress and improve quality of life.

摘要

目的

乳腺癌幸存者可能面临更高的情绪困扰和更低的生活质量风险。促进健康活动的生存护理计划(SCP)可能会支持幸福感;然而,幸存者可能没有收到或参与他们的 SCP。本研究旨在评估乳腺癌幸存者接受和参与 SCP 活动的情况,以及参与的障碍。

方法

乳腺癌幸存者(n=187;99%为女性,平均年龄=57.7)同意并完成了对 SCP 推荐、参与和对健康活动的兴趣以及参与障碍的自我报告评估。

结果

少数参与者回忆起收到 SCP(21%)。推荐最多(62%)和完成(53%)的活动是锻炼。对向 SCP 添加其他健康活动的兴趣很高,大约有 50%的参与者报告对几种活动(例如身心、营养、心理治疗干预)感兴趣。有一半的人表示,有医生设计的计划会影响他们参与活动。报告的 SCP 活动参与障碍最常见的是缺乏时间(82%)、工作/学校(65%)和缺乏信息(65%)。

结论

很少有幸存者回忆起收到正式的 SCP,缺乏有关健康活动的信息是参与的常见障碍。对健康活动的兴趣普遍较高,这可能表明需要更正式的处方或动机增强技术来促进 SCP 的参与。临床可能需要强调 SCP 建议,以增强对健康活动的回忆和参与,从而减轻心理困扰并提高生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ec2/8482782/9d7c96d8ab01/nihms-1742221-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ec2/8482782/911614efe869/nihms-1742221-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ec2/8482782/9d7c96d8ab01/nihms-1742221-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ec2/8482782/911614efe869/nihms-1742221-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ec2/8482782/9d7c96d8ab01/nihms-1742221-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and engagement in breast cancer survivorship wellness activities.乳腺癌生存者健康活动的障碍和参与度。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(1):317-325. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06279-4. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Impact of Survivorship Care Plans and Planning on Breast, Colon, and Prostate Cancer Survivors in a Community Oncology Practice.社区肿瘤医疗实践中生存护理计划及规划对乳腺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌幸存者的影响
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):249-255. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1457-y.
3
Outcomes and satisfaction after delivery of a breast cancer survivorship care plan: results of a multicenter trial.乳腺癌生存护理计划实施后的结局与满意度:一项多中心试验的结果
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):e222-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001404.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans.实施癌症幸存者护理计划的障碍与促进因素。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):575-80. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.575-580.
5
Acceptability and feasibility of survivorship care plans and an accompanying mobile health intervention for adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer.青少年和青年癌症幸存者的生存护理计划及其伴随的移动健康干预措施的可接受性和可行性。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Mar;68(3):e28884. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28884. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
6
Personal decision support for survivor engagement: formulation and feasibility evaluation of a conceptual framework for implementing online cancer survivorship care plans.个人决策支持以促进生存者参与:实施在线癌症生存者照护计划概念框架的制定和可行性评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1073-8.
7
Survivorship Care Plans in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Care Plan Outcomes.癌症患者生存护理计划:护理计划结果的 Meta 分析和系统评价。
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e351-e372. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0184. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
8
Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach.患者和临床护理提供者共同制定和评估膀胱癌特定生存护理计划:一种多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 24;20(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7.
9
Associations among survivorship care plans, experiences of survivorship care, and functioning in older breast cancer survivors: CALGB/Alliance 369901.生存护理计划、生存护理体验与老年乳腺癌幸存者功能之间的关联:CALGB/联盟369901。
J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Dec;8(4):627-37. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0371-5. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
10
Evaluation of the delivery of survivorship care plans for South Asian female breast cancer survivors residing in Canada.对居住在加拿大的南亚女性乳腺癌幸存者的生存护理计划实施情况的评估。
Curr Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(4):e265-e274. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3734. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of digital health solutions in supporting adult cancer survivorship care.评估数字健康解决方案在支持成人癌症幸存者护理方面疗效的系统评价的伞形综述方案。
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0322100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322100. eCollection 2025.
2
Survivorship care plan utilization in Australia and New Zealand: survivors', parents' and healthcare providers' perspectives.澳大利亚和新西兰的癌症幸存者护理计划应用情况:幸存者、家长及医疗服务提供者的观点
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 12;33(3):182. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09238-7.
3
Preferences for breast cancer survivorship programs among multiracial and ethnic women.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing dropout in acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and problem-solving therapy for chronic pain and cancer patients using motivational interviewing.使用动机性访谈降低慢性疼痛和癌症患者在接受和承诺疗法、正念认知疗法和问题解决疗法中的脱落率。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Sep;59(3):424-438. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12254. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Breast cancer survivorship care plans: what are they covering and how well do they align with national guidelines?乳腺癌生存者护理计划:它们涵盖哪些内容,以及与国家指南的契合程度如何?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;179(2):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05480-w. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
3
多种族和族裔女性对乳腺癌幸存者项目的偏好
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 9:rs.3.rs-5312826. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5312826/v1.
4
The effectiveness of personalised surveillance and aftercare in breast cancer follow-up: a systematic review.个性化监测和随访在乳腺癌随访中的效果:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 2;32(5):323. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08530-2.
5
Perception of Survivorship Needs Among Breast Cancer Patients in Trinidad and Tobago.特立尼达和多巴哥乳腺癌患者对生存需求的认知
Cureus. 2023 Jan 30;15(1):e34394. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34394. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Utilization of cancer survivorship services during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary referral center.在一家三级转诊中心,癌症幸存者服务在 COVID-19 大流行期间的利用情况。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Dec;17(6):1708-1714. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01231-x. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
7
A Qualitative Study Exploring Feasibility and Acceptability of Acupuncture, Yoga, and Mindfulness Meditation for Managing Weight After Breast Cancer.一项探索针灸、瑜伽和正念冥想用于乳腺癌后体重管理的可行性和可接受性的定性研究。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15347354221099540. doi: 10.1177/15347354221099540.
8
Heterogeneity of posttraumatic stress, depression, and fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a latent class analysis.创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和乳腺癌幸存者对癌症复发恐惧的异质性:潜类分析。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Oct;17(5):1510-1521. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01195-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Nutrition and Breast Cancer: A Literature Review on Prevention, Treatment and Recurrence.
营养与乳腺癌:预防、治疗和复发的文献综述。
Nutrients. 2019 Jul 3;11(7):1514. doi: 10.3390/nu11071514.
4
Associations Between Breast Cancer Survivorship and Adverse Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.乳腺癌生存者与不良心理健康结局之间的关联:系统评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Dec 1;110(12):1311-1327. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy177.
5
Survivorship Care Plan Implementation in US Cancer Programs: a National Survey of Cancer Care Providers.美国癌症项目中的幸存者护理计划实施情况:癌症护理提供者的全国性调查。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):614-622. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1374-0.
6
Mind-body interventions for fear of cancer recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心理躯体干预对癌症复发恐惧的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychooncology. 2018 Nov;27(11):2546-2558. doi: 10.1002/pon.4757. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy on quality of life and psychological health of breast cancer survivors and patients.一项关于认知行为疗法对乳腺癌幸存者和患者生活质量和心理健康疗效的荟萃分析。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jul;27(7):1695-1703. doi: 10.1002/pon.4687. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
The implications of women's activity limitations and role disruptions during breast cancer survivorship.乳腺癌幸存者在活动受限和角色中断方面的影响。
Womens Health (Lond). 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1745505718756381. doi: 10.1177/1745505718756381.
9
Survivorship care plans for breast cancer patients: understanding the quality of the available evidence.乳腺癌患者的生存护理计划:了解现有证据的质量
Curr Oncol. 2017 Dec;24(6):e446-e465. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3632. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Effects of physical activity on depressive symptoms during breast cancer survivorship: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials.体育活动对乳腺癌幸存者抑郁症状的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
ESMO Open. 2017 Dec 11;2(5):e000271. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000271. eCollection 2017.