Samantaray Subham, Goyal Nishant, Kesavan Muralidharan, Venkatasubramanian Ganesan, Bose Anushree, Shreekantiah Umesh, Sreeraj Vanteemar S, Das Manul, Raj Justin, Kumar Sujeet
Department of Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry (CIP), Ranchi, India.
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India.
Brain Topogr. 2025 Feb 12;38(2):30. doi: 10.1007/s10548-025-01103-4.
The selection of an appropriate virtual reference schema is pivotal in determining the outcomes of event-related potential (ERP) studies, particularly within the widely utilized Talk/Listen ERP paradigm, which is employed to non-invasively explore the corollary discharge phenomenon in the speech-auditory system. This research centers on examining the effects of prevalent EEG reference schemas-linked mastoids (LM), common average reference (CAR), and reference electrode standardization technique (REST)-through statistical analysis, statistical parametric scalp mapping (SPSM), and source localization techniques. Our ANOVA findings indicate significant main effects for both the reference and the experimental condition on the amplitude of N1 ERPs. Depending on the reference used, the polarity and amplitude of the N1 ERPs demonstrate systematic variations: LM is associated with pronounced frontocentral activity, whereas both CAR and REST exhibit patterns of frontocentral and occipitotemporal activity. The significance of SPSM results is confined to regions exhibiting prominent N1 activity for each reference schema. Source analysis provides corroborative evidence more aligned with the SPSM results for CAR and REST than for LM, suggesting that results under CAR and REST are more objective and reliable. Therefore, the CAR and REST reference are recommended for future studies involving Talk/Listen ERP paradigms.
选择合适的虚拟参考模式对于确定事件相关电位(ERP)研究的结果至关重要,特别是在广泛使用的“交谈/聆听”ERP范式中,该范式用于非侵入性地探索言语听觉系统中的伴随放电现象。本研究聚焦于通过统计分析、统计参数头皮映射(SPSM)和源定位技术,考察常见的脑电图参考模式——耳垂参考(LM)、平均公共参考(CAR)和参考电极标准化技术(REST)的效果。我们的方差分析结果表明,参考模式和实验条件对N1 ERP的波幅均有显著的主效应。根据所使用的参考模式,N1 ERP的极性和波幅呈现出系统性变化:LM与明显的额中央活动相关,而CAR和REST均表现出额中央和枕颞活动模式。SPSM结果的显著性仅限于每个参考模式下表现出显著N1活动的区域。源分析提供的佐证证据与CAR和REST的SPSM结果比与LM的结果更一致,这表明CAR和REST条件下的结果更客观可靠。因此,建议在未来涉及“交谈/聆听”ERP范式的研究中使用CAR和REST参考模式。