• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从资格认定到诊断:初级保健中脑瘫诊断的候选资格及复杂过程

From eligibility to diagnosis: candidacy and the complex journey of cerebral palsy diagnosis within primary care.

作者信息

Baggaley Jessica, Seiboth Charlotte, Rapley Tim, Basu Anna

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05455-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-025-05455-5
PMID:39939861
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11823032/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is an umbrella term for a group of permanent postural and movement conditions caused by non-progressive damage to the developing brain. Infants not identified with risk factors for CP around the time of birth are usually referred on from primary care after six months of age, essentially precluding early therapy. Candidacy, a seven-step dynamic theory, describes how individuals negotiate their eligibility for medical attention with themselves, others, and health services. This study aims to explore the CP diagnostic journey for community identified infants using the concept of candidacy.

METHODS

Data was combined from two studies: an online survey of caregivers of children with CP about their earliest concerns and diagnosis journeys (n=255), and a series of interviews to support the development of a new tool to facilitate earlier identification of infants with emerging motor difficulties (11 parents, 11 health care professionals [HCPs]). A deductive thematic analysis was used with a semantic, critical realist approach. An initial analysis was framed by the Andersen Model of Total Patient delay, and then conceptualised using Candidacy.

RESULTS

Participants had difficulties identifying whether their child needed medical attention, prompting online searches, and seeking advice from family and friends. HCP adjudications led to immediate or delayed referral, in which families continued their searches, reappearing at services until a referral was made. Once referred, families faced poor operating conditions, such as long waiting times. After learning the diagnosis criteria, participants began making requests for referral and navigated to private services if requests were denied. Participants felt that more information on infant development from a reliable source was needed to support new parents in raising their concerns to aid earlier identification.

CONCLUSION

Participants identified personal lack of infant development knowledge as being the limiting factor to earlier referral. Further research is needed to develop materials relevant for the UK and to understand General Practitioner perspectives regarding provision of such materials.

摘要

背景

脑性瘫痪(CP)是一个统称,用于描述由发育中的大脑遭受非进行性损伤而导致的一组永久性姿势和运动障碍。出生时未被识别出有脑性瘫痪风险因素的婴儿通常在六个月大后从初级保健机构转诊,这基本上排除了早期治疗的可能性。“候选资格”是一种七步动态理论,描述了个体如何与自己、他人以及医疗服务机构协商获得医疗关注的资格。本研究旨在运用“候选资格”概念探索社区确诊婴儿的脑性瘫痪诊断过程。

方法

数据来自两项研究:一项关于脑性瘫痪患儿照料者最早担忧及诊断过程的在线调查(n = 255),以及一系列为支持开发一种有助于更早识别有运动发育困难婴儿的新工具而进行的访谈(11名家长、11名医疗保健专业人员[HCPs])。采用语义批判现实主义方法进行演绎主题分析。最初的分析以安徒生患者总延迟模型为框架,然后运用“候选资格”概念进行概念化。

结果

参与者难以确定他们的孩子是否需要医疗关注,于是进行在线搜索,并向家人和朋友寻求建议。医疗保健专业人员的判定导致立即或延迟转诊,在此过程中,家庭继续搜索,不断出现在各服务机构,直到获得转诊。一旦获得转诊,家庭面临恶劣的就医条件,比如等待时间过长。在了解诊断标准后,参与者开始要求转诊,如果请求被拒绝,就转向私立服务机构。参与者认为,需要从可靠来源获取更多关于婴儿发育的信息,以帮助新手父母提出他们的担忧,从而有助于更早识别。

结论

参与者认为个人缺乏婴儿发育知识是早期转诊的限制因素。需要进一步开展研究,以开发与英国相关的资料,并了解全科医生对提供此类资料的看法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ca/11823032/7717ca9c90eb/12887_2025_5455_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ca/11823032/7717ca9c90eb/12887_2025_5455_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ca/11823032/7717ca9c90eb/12887_2025_5455_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
From eligibility to diagnosis: candidacy and the complex journey of cerebral palsy diagnosis within primary care.从资格认定到诊断:初级保健中脑瘫诊断的候选资格及复杂过程
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05455-5.
2
The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy.脑瘫患儿照料者的健康与幸福。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e626-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1689.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Age at Referral of Children for Initial Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation: Current Practices.脑瘫患儿初次诊断及康复转诊时的年龄:当前实践情况
J Child Neurol. 2016 Mar;31(3):364-9. doi: 10.1177/0883073815596610. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
5
Age at referral for diagnosis and rehabilitation services for cerebral palsy: a scoping review.脑性瘫痪诊断和康复服务转诊年龄:范围综述。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Aug;61(8):908-914. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14034. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
6
Current Referral Practices for Diagnosis and Intervention for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A National Environmental Scan.当前针对脑瘫儿童的诊断和干预的转诊实践:全国环境扫描。
J Pediatr. 2020 Jan;216:173-180.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.035.
7
Assessment and management of the communication difficulties of children with cerebral palsy: a UK survey of SLT practice.脑瘫儿童沟通障碍的评估与管理:英国言语和语言治疗师实践调查
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Mar-Apr;50(2):241-59. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12138. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8
The health of primary caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: how does it compare with that of other Canadian caregivers?脑瘫患儿主要照料者的健康状况:与其他加拿大照料者相比如何?
Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2):e182-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.2.e182.
9
Additional therapy for young children with spastic cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial.痉挛型脑瘫幼儿的附加治疗:一项随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2007 May;11(16):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-71. doi: 10.3310/hta11160.
10
Caregiver perspectives of scoliosis surgery for children with cerebral palsy: a qualitative study.照顾者对脑瘫患儿脊柱侧弯手术的看法:一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jan;47(2):459-468. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2342501. Epub 2024 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Global prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic analysis.全球脑瘫患病率:系统分析。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Dec;64(12):1494-1506. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15346. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Factors that contribute to disparities in time to acute leukemia diagnosis in young people: an in depth qualitative interview study.导致年轻人急性白血病诊断时间差异的因素:一项深入的定性访谈研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 May 12;22(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09547-8.
3
A qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators affecting ethnic minority patient groups when accessing medicine review services: Perspectives of healthcare professionals.
少数民族患者群体在使用药物审查服务时所面临的障碍和促进因素的定性探讨:医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):628-638. doi: 10.1111/hex.13410. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Early Intervention for Children Aged 0 to 2 Years With or at High Risk of Cerebral Palsy: International Clinical Practice Guideline Based on Systematic Reviews.0 至 2 岁或有脑瘫高风险的儿童的早期干预:基于系统评价的国际临床实践指南。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):846-858. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0878.
5
Parent's perspectives of the pathway to diagnosis of childhood cancer: a matter of diagnostic triage.父母对儿童癌症诊断途径的看法:诊断分诊问题
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05821-2.
6
What parents want to know in the first postnatal year: A Delphi consensus study.产后第一年父母想了解的内容:一项德尔菲共识研究。
Child Care Health Dev. 2021 Jan;47(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/cch.12806. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
Cerebral palsy in children: a clinical overview.儿童脑性瘫痪:临床概述
Transl Pediatr. 2020 Feb;9(Suppl 1):S125-S135. doi: 10.21037/tp.2020.01.01.
8
A categorisation of problems and solutions to improve patient referrals from primary to specialty care.改善患者从基层医疗转诊至专科医疗的问题与解决方案分类。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):986. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3745-y.
9
What should a website dedicated to the postnatal period contain? A Delphi survey among parents and professionals.一个专注于产后阶段的网站应该包含哪些内容?一项针对家长和专业人士的德尔菲调查。
Midwifery. 2017 Oct;53:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
10
Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines.脸书作为社会科学的研究工具:机遇、挑战、伦理考量及实用指南。
Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):543-56. doi: 10.1037/a0039210.