• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺炎严重程度指数和CURB-65评分与中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、血小板/淋巴细胞比值及单核细胞/淋巴细胞比值在预测社区获得性肺炎住院死亡率中的相关性:一项观察性研究

Correlation of Pneumonia Severity Index and CURB-65 Score with Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio, and Monocyte/Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Observational Study.

作者信息

Calis Aliye Gamze, Karaboga Burcu, Uzer Fatih, Kaplan Nermin, Karaca Mustafa, Gedik Rojan Barış, Durmuş Ahmet Alper

机构信息

Chest Disease Clinic, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.

Chest Disease Clinic, Ataturk State Hospital, 07070 Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 23;14(3):728. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030728.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14030728
PMID:39941399
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11818467/
Abstract

: Community-acquired pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and various scoring systems and laboratory assessments are available for predicting prognosis. The untapped potential of combining the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with the monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and their correlation with the pneumonia severity index (PSI) and CURB-65 motivated our research. We thought that this would provide more robust data for predicting CAP prognosis. We aimed to assess hematologic parameters' associations with the PSI, CURB-65, and qSOFA scores for predicting the prognosis of hospitalized CAP patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a multicenter, observational study conducted in three hospitals in Türkiye, Antalya. : A total of 343 patients hospitalized with CAP in three centers in Turkey, Antalya, between 1 January 2020 and 30 September 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. The demographic data, comorbidities, vital signs, radiological images, laboratory findings, and 30-day mortality results of the patients were recorded. CURB-65, PSI, and qSOFA scores were calculated. : This study included 163 females (47%) with an average age of 74 ± 11.8. Hospital mortality occurred in 51 patients. Non-survivor CAP cases had higher ages ( = 0.007), CURB-65 scores ( < 0.001), PSIs ( < 0.001), and qSOFA scores ( < 0.001) and a longer hospital stay ( = 0.001) and total antibiotic duration ( < 0.001). Additionally, the NLR ( = 0.009), MLR ( = 0.018), and PLR ( = 0.025) were higher in the non-survivor group. The CURB-65, PSI, and qSOFA scores demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for in-hospital mortality. In the ROC analysis conducted to predict in-hospital mortality, the area under the curve (AUC) for CURB-65, the PSI, and qSOFA was determined to be 0.83, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively. The NLR correlated positively with CURB-65, the PSI, and qSOFA; the PLR correlated with the PSI and qSOFA; and the MLR correlated with CURB-65. : CURB-65 and PSI scores remain highly effective for predicting in-hospital mortality in CAP patients, as demonstrated by their superior AUC values. While the NLR, MLR, and PLR showed weak predictive performance compared to these scores, their correlations suggest their potential as adjunctive markers.

摘要

社区获得性肺炎是发病和死亡的主要原因,有多种评分系统和实验室评估方法可用于预测预后。将中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与单核细胞/淋巴细胞比值(MLR)和血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)相结合的未开发潜力及其与肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)和CURB-65的相关性激发了我们的研究。我们认为这将为预测社区获得性肺炎的预后提供更有力的数据。我们旨在评估血液学参数与PSI、CURB-65和qSOFA评分之间的关联,以预测住院社区获得性肺炎患者的预后。设计与背景:这是一项在土耳其安塔利亚的三家医院进行的多中心观察性研究。:回顾性纳入了2020年1月1日至2023年9月30日期间在土耳其安塔利亚的三个中心因社区获得性肺炎住院的343例患者。记录了患者的人口统计学数据、合并症、生命体征、放射影像、实验室检查结果和30天死亡率结果。计算了CURB-65、PSI和qSOFA评分。:本研究包括163名女性(47%),平均年龄为74±11.8岁。51例患者发生医院死亡。非存活的社区获得性肺炎病例年龄较大(P = 0.007)、CURB-65评分较高(P < 0.001)、PSI较高(P < 0.001)、qSOFA评分较高(P < 0.001),住院时间较长(P = 0.001),总抗生素使用时间较长(P < 0.001)。此外,非存活组的NLR(P = 0.009)、MLR(P = 0.018)和PLR(P = 0.025)较高。CURB-65、PSI和qSOFA评分对院内死亡率具有较强的预测能力。在预测院内死亡率的ROC分析中,CURB-65、PSI和qSOFA的曲线下面积(AUC)分别确定为0.83、0.82和0.82。NLR与CURB-65、PSI和qSOFA呈正相关;PLR与PSI和qSOFA相关;MLR与CURB-65相关。:CURB-65和PSI评分在预测社区获得性肺炎患者的院内死亡率方面仍然非常有效,这从它们优越的AUC值可以看出。虽然与这些评分相比,NLR、MLR和PLR的预测性能较弱,但它们的相关性表明它们作为辅助标志物的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937c/11818467/2dc1be9ab434/jcm-14-00728-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937c/11818467/fb72249365cd/jcm-14-00728-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937c/11818467/2dc1be9ab434/jcm-14-00728-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937c/11818467/fb72249365cd/jcm-14-00728-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937c/11818467/2dc1be9ab434/jcm-14-00728-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation of Pneumonia Severity Index and CURB-65 Score with Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio, and Monocyte/Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Observational Study.肺炎严重程度指数和CURB-65评分与中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、血小板/淋巴细胞比值及单核细胞/淋巴细胞比值在预测社区获得性肺炎住院死亡率中的相关性:一项观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 23;14(3):728. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030728.
2
Diagnostic value of blood parameters for community-acquired pneumonia.血参数对社区获得性肺炎的诊断价值。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 Nov;64:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population.比较不同评分系统对老年社区获得性肺炎患者死亡率和 ICU 入院率的预测作用。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Oct 28;16:1917-1929. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S335315. eCollection 2021.
4
Efficacy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting clinical outcomes among community-acquired pneumonia patients presenting in the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估在预测急诊科就诊的社区获得性肺炎患者临床结局中的疗效。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05044-0.
5
Pneumonia Severity Index and CURB-65 Score Are Good Predictors of Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Community-Acquired Pneumonia.肺炎严重指数和 CURB-65 评分是预测 SARS-CoV-2 社区获得性肺炎住院患者死亡率的良好指标。
Chest. 2022 Apr;161(4):927-936. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.031. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
6
The ratio of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte and association with mortality in community-acquired pneumonia: a derivation-validation cohort study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值与社区获得性肺炎死亡率的关系:一项推导-验证队列研究。
Infection. 2023 Oct;51(5):1339-1347. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-01992-2. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
7
The prognostic performance of qSOFA for community-acquired pneumonia.qSOFA对社区获得性肺炎的预后评估表现
J Intensive Care. 2018 Aug 8;6:46. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0307-7. eCollection 2018.
8
qSOFA as a new community-acquired pneumonia severity score in the emergency setting.qSOFA 作为一种新的急诊社区获得性肺炎严重程度评分。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Dec;38(12):906-912. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208789. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
9
Combining a Frailty Index Based on Laboratory Data and Pneumonia Severity Assessments to Predict In-Hospital Outcomes in Older Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.基于实验室数据和肺炎严重程度评估的衰弱指数联合预测老年社区获得性肺炎患者住院结局。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2023;27(4):270-276. doi: 10.1007/s12603-023-1905-1.
10
The role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting outcomes among patients with community-acquired pneumonia.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在预测社区获得性肺炎患者预后中的作用。
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Jan;25(1):100278. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100278. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Critical Illness in Adults on Vancomycin: A Cross-Sectional Study.成人使用万古霉素时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与危重病的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Jul 31;18:4157-4167. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S537039. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of Serum Biomarkers in Differentiating Periprosthetic Joint Infections from Aseptic Failures after Total Hip Arthroplasties.血清生物标志物在全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染与无菌性失败鉴别诊断中的作用
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):5716. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195716.
2
[The relationship between the comprehensive blood inflammation indexes and stage I pneumoconiosis and its combined lung infections].[全血炎症指标与一期尘肺及其合并肺部感染的关系]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2024 May 20;42(5):350-355. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20231010-00081.
3
CURB-65 and Long-Term Mortality of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study on Hospitalized Patients.
CURB-65与社区获得性肺炎的长期死亡率:一项关于住院患者的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Mar 12;15(3):e36052. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36052. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
The ratio of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte and association with mortality in community-acquired pneumonia: a derivation-validation cohort study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值与社区获得性肺炎死亡率的关系:一项推导-验证队列研究。
Infection. 2023 Oct;51(5):1339-1347. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-01992-2. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
5
Bacterial Patterns and Empiric Antibiotic Use in COPD Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia.COPD 患者社区获得性肺炎的细菌模式和经验性抗生素使用。
Arch Bronconeumol. 2023 Feb;59(2):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
6
NLR, MLR, PLR and RDW to predict outcome and differentiate between viral and bacterial pneumonia in the intensive care unit.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值和红细胞分布宽度在重症监护病房预测预后和区分病毒性与细菌性肺炎。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 24;12(1):15974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20385-3.
7
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.
8
Neutrophil Count Percentage and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients Hospitalized for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.中性粒细胞计数百分比和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为社区获得性肺炎住院患者的预后标志物
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2019 Sep;55(9):472-477. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
9
Diagnostic value of blood parameters for community-acquired pneumonia.血参数对社区获得性肺炎的诊断价值。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 Nov;64:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
10
The prognostic performance of qSOFA for community-acquired pneumonia.qSOFA对社区获得性肺炎的预后评估表现
J Intensive Care. 2018 Aug 8;6:46. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0307-7. eCollection 2018.