Blázquez-Fernández Aitor, Navarro-López Víctor, Marcos-Antón Selena, Cano-de-la-Cuerda Roberto
International PhD School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28008 Madrid, Spain.
Asociación de Leganés de Esclerosis Múltiple (ALEM), Leganés, 28915 Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 27;14(3):839. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030839.
The prognosis of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) has improved substantially in recent decades due to advances in diagnosis and treatment. Due to the unpredictable course and heterogenous treatment response in MS, there is a clear need for biomarkers that reflect disease activity in the clinical follow-up of these patients. We conducted a systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis with the aim of analyzing the effects of physical exercise on neurofilaments (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in patients with MS. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, starting with a PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) question: what are the clinical effects of physical exercise (with independence of the type) on NfL and/or GFAP levels in patients with MS compared with other interventions or no intervention whatsoever? A systematically comprehensive literature search was conducted from January to March 2024 to identify original studies that answered the PICO question, using the main data sources. The quality of the studies included was assessed using the Quality Index of Downs & Black. For studies included in the systematic review that followed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, the methodological quality of each paper was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. Risk of bias was also explored by two independent reviewers. Finally, all articles were classified according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for diagnosis studies established by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. For continuous outcome measures with enough comparisons and a methodological quality greater than or equal to good according to the PEDro scale, a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was applied. The statistical analyses were performed in R (version 4.1.3, R Core Team 2023) using the "BUGSnet" and "gemtc" packages. Bayesian NMA can be used to obtain a posterior probability distribution of all the relative treatment effects, which allows us to quantify the uncertainty of parameter estimates and to rank all the treatments in the network. Eight studies were included in this systematic review and six articles in the NMA, and they were appraised for quality. The characteristics of the included studies, types of training and described protocols, methodological quality, risk of bias, and clinical effects on the studied biomarkers were outlined. Qualitative synthesis, effects of different exercise modalities in NfL with the Bayesian NMA, selection of the final model and model assessment, and ranking of interventions are also shown. Our findings indicated that moderate-intensity exercise is more likely to reduce NfL concentration compared to high-intensity exercise, and, in turn, high-intensity exercise is more likely to reduce NfL concentration than low-intensity exercise. However, the effects of high-intensity exercise on GFAP levels were inconclusive.
近几十年来,由于诊断和治疗方面的进展,多发性硬化症(MS)患者的预后有了显著改善。由于MS病程不可预测且治疗反应存在异质性,在这些患者的临床随访中,显然需要能够反映疾病活动的生物标志物。我们进行了一项基于贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的系统评价,旨在分析体育锻炼对MS患者神经丝(NfL)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平的影响。按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统评价,从一个PICO(患者/人群、干预措施、对照和结局)问题开始:与其他干预措施或不进行任何干预相比,体育锻炼(不考虑类型)对MS患者NfL和/或GFAP水平有哪些临床影响?在2024年1月至3月期间进行了系统全面的文献检索,以使用主要数据源识别回答PICO问题的原始研究。使用唐斯和布莱克质量指数评估纳入研究的质量。对于纳入系统评价且采用随机对照试验(RCT)设计的研究,使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估每篇论文的方法学质量。两名独立评审员还探讨了偏倚风险。最后,根据牛津循证医学中心制定的诊断研究证据水平和推荐等级对所有文章进行分类。对于具有足够比较且根据PEDro量表方法学质量大于或等于良好的连续结局指标,应用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)。统计分析在R(版本4.1.3,R核心团队2023)中使用“BUGSnet”和“gemtc”软件包进行。贝叶斯NMA可用于获得所有相对治疗效果的后验概率分布,这使我们能够量化参数估计的不确定性并对网络中的所有治疗进行排序。本系统评价纳入了8项研究,NMA纳入了6篇文章,并对它们的质量进行了评估。概述了纳入研究的特征、训练类型和描述的方案、方法学质量、偏倚风险以及对所研究生物标志物的临床影响。还展示了定性综合分析、贝叶斯NMA中不同运动方式对NfL的影响、最终模型的选择和模型评估以及干预措施的排序。我们的研究结果表明,与高强度运动相比,中等强度运动更有可能降低NfL浓度,反过来,高强度运动比低强度运动更有可能降低NfL浓度。然而,高强度运动对GFAP水平的影响尚无定论。