• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科护理痴呆症患者的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。

Barriers and facilitators to caring for patients living with dementia in the emergency department: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Jelinski Dana, Reich Krista, Lang Eddy, Holroyd-Leduc Jayna, Goodarzi Zahra

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services-Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services-Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2025 Apr;27(4):285-293. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00862-0. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00862-0
PMID:39946009
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients living with dementia are complex and visit the emergency department (ED) more frequently than other populations. There is a knowledge gap regarding challenges in care delivery for these patients from the perspective of interdisciplinary healthcare providers. The aim of this study was to identify the barriers and facilitators to caring for people living with dementia in the ED as perceived by healthcare providers to gain a deeper understanding of current care gaps and inform best care practices.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare providers to understand their experiences in caring for people living with dementia in the ED. Healthcare providers currently employed within in a Calgary zone ED and with experience in caring for people living with dementia in the ED were eligible for participation. The Framework Method based on the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel was used in the analysis to inform change interventions by addressing key factors that influence behavior.

RESULTS

A total of 11 providers participated. Key facilitators to care included collaborative team approaches; collateral information from care partners, EMS, and care homes; geriatric medicine staff; addressing non-medical needs; and person-centered care. Key barriers to care included the ED environment encompassing challenges with lack of resources, staff, and time constraints; deteriorating cognition and behavioral challenges; and a lack of dementia-specific guidance and training.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights key issues in emergency care delivery at the system, unit, provider, and patient levels for people living with dementia through the analysis of healthcare provider experiences. Environmental context and resources, skills, and social/professional role and identity were key domains correlating to the major barriers and facilitators in these findings. Key opportunities for change are identified through which targeted interventions and policies may address dementia-related care gaps within the ED context.

摘要

目的

痴呆症患者情况复杂,比其他人群更频繁地前往急诊科(ED)就诊。从跨学科医疗服务提供者的角度来看,在为这些患者提供护理方面存在哪些挑战,目前仍存在知识空白。本研究的目的是确定医疗服务提供者所认为的在急诊科护理痴呆症患者的障碍和促进因素,以便更深入地了解当前的护理差距,并为最佳护理实践提供参考。

方法

对医疗服务提供者进行半结构化访谈,以了解他们在急诊科护理痴呆症患者的经验。目前受雇于卡尔加里地区急诊科且有在急诊科护理痴呆症患者经验的医疗服务提供者有资格参与。分析采用基于理论领域框架和行为改变轮的框架方法,通过解决影响行为的关键因素来为变革干预提供信息。

结果

共有11名提供者参与。护理的关键促进因素包括协作团队方法;来自护理伙伴、紧急医疗服务(EMS)和养老院的间接信息;老年医学工作人员;满足非医疗需求;以及以患者为中心的护理。护理的关键障碍包括急诊科环境,存在资源不足、人员短缺和时间限制等挑战;认知能力下降和行为问题;以及缺乏针对痴呆症的指导和培训。

结论

本研究通过分析医疗服务提供者的经验,突出了痴呆症患者在系统、科室、提供者和患者层面的急诊护理中的关键问题。环境背景和资源、技能以及社会/职业角色和身份是与这些研究结果中的主要障碍和促进因素相关的关键领域。确定了关键的变革机会,通过这些机会,有针对性的干预措施和政策可以解决急诊科环境中与痴呆症相关的护理差距。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to caring for patients living with dementia in the emergency department: a qualitative study.急诊科护理痴呆症患者的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。
CJEM. 2025 Apr;27(4):285-293. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00862-0. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Perspectives from persons living with dementia and their caregivers on emergency department visits, care transitions, and outpatient follow-up: A qualitative study.痴呆症患者及其照顾者对急诊科就诊、护理过渡和门诊随访的看法:一项定性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;31(8):767-776. doi: 10.1111/acem.14898. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
7
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
8
Evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed-method study.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)低热量饮食实施试点评估:一项联合开展的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(29):1-63. doi: 10.3310/MPRT2139.
9
Pain Assessment and Management in Dementia Care: Qualitative Perspectives of People With Dementia, Their Families, and Healthcare Professionals.痴呆症护理中的疼痛评估与管理:痴呆症患者、其家人及医护人员的定性观点
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(7):2933-2947. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17771. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Caregivers' burden of care during emergency department care transitions among older adults: a mixed methods cohort study.老年人在急诊科就诊期间护理交接时护理人员的负担:一项混合方法队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05388-1.
2
Nonmedical problems among older adults visiting the emergency department for low acuity conditions: A prospective multicentre cohort study.因低 acuity 状况前往急诊科就诊的老年人中的非医疗问题:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。 注:这里“acuity”可能是“acute”的错误拼写,结合语境推测应是“急性的”意思,所以更准确的翻译或许是:因低急性状况前往急诊科就诊的老年人中的非医疗问题:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。 但按要求严格翻译就是上述译文 。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 3;10(15):e35352. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35352. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
3
Perspectives from persons living with dementia and their caregivers on emergency department visits, care transitions, and outpatient follow-up: A qualitative study.
痴呆症患者及其照顾者对急诊科就诊、护理过渡和门诊随访的看法:一项定性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;31(8):767-776. doi: 10.1111/acem.14898. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Emergency department communication with diverse caregivers and persons living with dementia: A qualitative study.急诊科与不同照护者和痴呆症患者的沟通:一项定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jun;72(6):1687-1696. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18897. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
5
Exploring access to community care and emergency department use among people with dementia: A qualitative interview study with people with dementia, and current and bereaved caregivers.探索痴呆症患者获得社区护理和急诊服务的途径:一项对痴呆症患者以及当前和已故护理者进行的定性访谈研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;38(7):e5966. doi: 10.1002/gps.5966.
6
Older persons living with dementia and their use of acute care services over 2 years in Alberta.阿尔伯塔省 2 年内患有痴呆症的老年人及其对急性护理服务的使用情况。
Can Fam Physician. 2023 Feb;69(2):114-124. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6902114.
7
Optimal Emergency Department Care Practices for Persons Living With Dementia: A Scoping Review.优化痴呆患者的急诊护理实践:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1314.e1-1314.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.024.
8
Emergency Department Care Transitions for Patients With Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review.急诊科认知障碍患者的就诊流程转接:综述
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1313.e1-1313.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.076. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
Evaluating older adults with cognitive dysfunction: A qualitative study with emergency clinicians.评估认知功能障碍的老年人:一项与急诊临床医生合作的定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Feb;70(2):341-351. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17581. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
10
The role and contribution of family carers accompanying community-living older people with cognitive impairment to the emergency department: An interview study.照顾认知障碍的社区居住老年人的家庭护理者在急诊科的作用和贡献:一项访谈研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Apr;31(7-8):975-984. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15954. Epub 2021 Jul 12.