Wang Peng, O'Connell Kelli, Bhimani Jenna, Blinder Victoria, Burganowski Rachael, Ergas Isaac J, Gallagher Grace B, Griggs Jennifer J, Heon Narre, Kolevska Tatjana, Kotsurovskyy Yuriy, Kroenke Candyce H, Laurent Cecile A, Liu Raymond, Nakata Kanichi G, Persaud Sonia, Rivera Donna R, Roh Janise M, Tabatabai Sara, Valice Emily, Bandera Elisa V, Kushi Lawrence H, Aiello Bowles Erin J, Kantor Elizabeth D
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Feb;9:e2400231. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00231. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
We evaluated the definitions of five comorbidities (renal and hepatic impairments, anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) in women with breast cancer using data from electronic health records.
In 11,097 women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-IIIA breast cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California or Kaiser Permanente Washington, we assessed comorbidity definitions in two commonly used lookback windows (1 year before diagnosis, T1; and extending until chemotherapy initiation, T1-2). Within each, we assessed data availability and agreement between International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-defined and lab-defined comorbidities of varying severity. To assess how different pieces of information may affect providers in making treatment decisions, we used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate four-category (with comorbidity indicated by both ICD and lab, ICD-only, lab-only, or neither) and collapsed binary (comorbidity indicated by either ICD or lab neither) definitions in relation to first cycle chemotherapy dose reduction (FCDR).
Extending the lookback period to chemotherapy initiation increased laboratory data availability (missingness ≤4.1% in T1-2 >40% in T1). Assessment of agreement guided selection of laboratory cutpoints. In both time periods, the four-category and binary comorbidity variables were associated with use of FCDR, but binary variables had larger cell sizes and more stability of regression models. Ultimately, the comorbidity variables in T1 were defined by a combination of either ICD/qualifying laboratory values. Results were similar in T1-2, except laboratory data alone outperformed the combination variable for renal and hepatic comorbidity.
Leveraging both ICD and lab data and extending the lookback period to include postdiagnosis but prechemotherapy initiation may provide better capture of comorbidity. Future studies may consider validating our findings with a gold-standard comorbidity status and in other community health care settings.
我们利用电子健康记录中的数据,评估了乳腺癌女性患者中五种合并症(肾损害、肝损害、贫血、中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少)的定义。
在加利福尼亚州北部凯撒医疗集团或华盛顿凯撒医疗集团接受I-IIIA期乳腺癌辅助化疗的11097名女性中,我们在两个常用的回顾期(诊断前1年,T1;以及延长至化疗开始,T1-2)内评估合并症定义。在每个回顾期内,我们评估了数据可用性以及国际疾病分类(ICD)定义的和实验室定义的不同严重程度合并症之间的一致性。为了评估不同信息片段如何影响医疗服务提供者做出治疗决策,我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估与首个化疗周期剂量减少(FCDR)相关的四类(ICD和实验室均表明有合并症、仅ICD表明有合并症、仅实验室表明有合并症或两者均未表明有合并症)和合并二元(ICD或实验室表明有合并症 两者均未表明有合并症)定义。
将回顾期延长至化疗开始增加了实验室数据的可用性(T1-2中缺失率≤4.1%,T1中>40%)。一致性评估指导了实验室切点的选择。在两个时间段内,四类和二元合并症变量均与FCDR的使用相关,但二元变量的单元格更大且回归模型更稳定。最终,T1中的合并症变量由ICD/合格实验室值的组合定义。T1-2中的结果相似,只是单独的实验室数据在肾和肝合并症方面优于组合变量。
利用ICD和实验室数据,并将回顾期延长至包括诊断后但化疗开始前的时间,可能会更好地捕捉合并症。未来的研究可以考虑用金标准合并症状态并在其他社区医疗环境中验证我们的发现。