Kress Mary, Lenze Nicholas R, Kazemi Ruby J, Ikeda Allison K, Vijayakumar Punithavathy, Goldstein Cathy A, Stanley Jeffrey J, Brenner Michael J, Hoff Paul T
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sleep Med. 2025 Apr;128:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.02.004. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
To explore perspectives about consumer sleep technology (CST) and barriers to its regular use and whether these vary by sociodemographic characteristics.
A multidisciplinary team developed a survey instrument which was disseminated to a national sample via an online platform. A mixed methods analysis using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and thematic content analysis was employed.
Among 897 survey respondents, mean age was 47.5 ± 16.9 years; 73.1 % identified as female, and 81.8 % as White. A total of 505 respondents (56.3 %) reported having tracked their sleep using CST. Concerns or barriers reported by respondents included cost (57.2 %), too many different types of CST (56.5 %), and data privacy/security concerns (38.7 %). Younger individuals (p < 0.001) and those with annual household income $30,000 to $57,999 per year (p = 0.006) or <$30,000 per year (p = 0.021) were more likely to report cost as a barrier in the adjusted analysis. Individuals with household income <$30,000 (p = 0.004) or identifying as Asian (p = 0.002) or Black (p = 0.004) race were more likely to report data privacy/security concerns. Among those who already owned CST, 12.3 % reported sleep-related worry/orthosomnia and 17 % reported not trusting the data. Qualitative analyses corroborated these findings, emphasizing concerns with data privacy/security, sleep-related worry, lack of trust in data accuracy, and physical discomfort.
Despite the growing popularity of CST, there exist several concerns and barriers to its regular use that may have health equity implications. Further research incorporating diverse stakeholders is necessary to address these barriers and promote optimal use of technology.
探讨消费者睡眠技术(CST)的相关观点及其常规使用的障碍,以及这些是否因社会人口学特征而异。
一个多学科团队开发了一份调查问卷,并通过在线平台分发给全国样本。采用了描述性统计、逻辑回归和主题内容分析的混合方法进行分析。
在897名调查受访者中,平均年龄为47.5±16.9岁;73.1%的受访者为女性,81.8%为白人。共有505名受访者(56.3%)报告使用CST追踪过他们的睡眠。受访者报告的担忧或障碍包括成本(57.2%)、CST类型过多(56.5%)以及数据隐私/安全担忧(38.7%)。在调整分析中,较年轻的个体(p<0.001)以及家庭年收入在30,000美元至57,999美元之间(p=0.006)或低于30,000美元(p=0.021)的个体更有可能将成本报告为障碍。家庭收入低于30,000美元(p=0.004)或属于亚洲(p=0.002)或黑人(p=0.004)种族的个体更有可能报告数据隐私/安全担忧。在已经拥有CST的人群中,12.3%报告有与睡眠相关的担忧/真性失眠,17%报告不信任数据。定性分析证实了这些发现,强调了对数据隐私/安全、与睡眠相关的担忧、对数据准确性缺乏信任以及身体不适的关注。
尽管CST越来越受欢迎,但在其常规使用方面存在一些担忧和障碍,可能对健康公平产生影响。有必要开展纳入不同利益相关者的进一步研究,以解决这些障碍并促进技术的最佳使用。