Venegas Hargous Carolina, Kapeke Kevin, Backholer Kathryn, Jeyapalan Dheepa, Nunez Veronica, Browne Jennifer, Peeters Anna, Chung Alexandra, Allender Steven, Stead Victoria, Paradies Yin, Zorbas Christina
Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, 3220, Australia.
The Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth), Level 2, 355 Spencer Street, West Melbourne, Melbourne, 3003, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21733-4.
Achieving nutrition and health equity warrants understanding lived experiences of marginalisation. Yet, people with diverse lived experiences are often inadequately included in food policy advocacy, agenda setting, and development. We aimed to explore cross-sectoral perceptions of engaging people with lived experiences of marginalisation in food policymaking in Australia, specifically in terms of challenges, enablers, required actions, and potential outcomes of doing so.
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 people with expertise in food policy and/or community engagement from academic, government, advocacy, and community sectors. Interviews were inductively and deductively coded using the Knowledge-to-Action framework.
Participants identified few food policymaking examples where people with lived experience have been meaningfully engaged. Reported barriers included the lack of time, resources, and prioritisation across sectors and the lack of political commitment to inclusive policymaking. Having access to successful examples, existing networks of actors and flexible funding were among the few enablers identified. Several actions were deemed necessary to effectively engage people with lived experience in food policymaking and improve current practice: (1) having a dedicated budget; (2) enabling true collaboration where people with lived experience are valued, effectively engaged, sufficiently represented, have the opportunity to work alongside decision-makers, and where power is equalised; (3) striving to do no harm to the people engaged; and (4) ensuring results from engaging people with lived experience are effectively disseminated.
We provide a list of practical recommendations to guide more inclusive, equitable and fit-for-purpose food policymaking into the future. These recommendations seek to challenge dominant systems of discrimination by demonstrating how we can tangibly shift to ways of working that value and elevate the power of people who are often excluded from many decision-making systems, specifically when it comes to food and nutrition.
实现营养与健康公平需要了解边缘化的生活经历。然而,具有不同生活经历的人群在食品政策倡导、议程设定和发展过程中,往往未得到充分纳入。我们旨在探讨澳大利亚跨部门对于让有边缘化生活经历的人群参与食品政策制定的看法,具体涉及这样做的挑战、促成因素、所需行动以及潜在结果。
对来自学术、政府、倡导和社区部门的24位具有食品政策和/或社区参与专业知识的人员进行了深入的半结构化访谈。访谈采用知识转化为行动框架进行归纳和演绎编码。
参与者指出,鲜有让有生活经历的人群有意义地参与食品政策制定的实例。报告的障碍包括各部门缺乏时间、资源和优先级,以及缺乏对包容性政策制定的政治承诺。获得成功案例、现有的行动者网络和灵活的资金是为数不多的已确定的促成因素。为有效让有生活经历的人群参与食品政策制定并改进当前做法,有几项行动被认为是必要的:(1)设立专项预算;(2)实现真正的合作,即重视有生活经历的人群、有效让他们参与、充分代表他们、让他们有机会与决策者并肩工作,以及实现权力平等;(3)努力不对参与人群造成伤害;(4)确保有效传播让有生活经历的人群参与所产生的成果。
我们提供了一系列实用建议,以指导未来更具包容性、公平性和针对性的食品政策制定。这些建议旨在挑战主导的歧视制度,展示我们如何切实转向重视并提升那些常常被排除在许多决策系统之外的人群的权力的工作方式,特别是在食品和营养方面。