• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“保持真实”:澳大利亚有过精神健康问题经历的人对参与和积极投入精神健康研究的偏好的定性探索。

'Keeping it real': A qualitative exploration of preferences of people with lived experience for participation and active involvement in mental health research in Australia.

机构信息

Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The University of Melbourne, The Australian National University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13934. doi: 10.1111/hex.13934.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13934
PMID:39102697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10775820/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Historically, researchers have been apt at conducting research on, rather than with, the people who are the focus of their efforts. Such approaches often fail to effectively support and benefit the populations they are intended to. This study aimed to explore the preferences of people with lived experience for engagement with research either as research participants within studies, or through active involvement in mental health research.

METHODS

Data for this paper were collected in three separate lived experience agenda-setting studies conducted over a 9-year period from 2013 to 2022; two group discussions and an open-ended online survey. Data were combined and thematic analysis undertaken.

RESULTS

Participants described the inclusion of lived experience as a critical ingredient and the highest level of knowledge and expertise in mental health research that should lead to knowledge generation and research agendas. Participants discussed the importance and value of research that enables sharing experiences and stories, expressed a need for flexibility in research methods for choice and agency, and support for greater active involvement of people with lived experience across all stages of research. Participants also spoke to the need for perspective and knowledge generated from people with lived experience to have equal power in research, making space for lived experience voices across multiple aspects of research, and greater respect and recognition of the value of lived experience.

CONCLUSION

Lived experience in mental health research is coming of age, but dedicated, cocreated development is needed to get it right. People with lived experience increasingly understand the value their experiential knowledge brings to the mental health research effort, and describe a wide range of ways that researchers can support them to be research participants, and to get actively involved. Power-sharing, respect and recognition of lived experience as central to effective mental health research are the keys to 'keeping it real'.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

People with lived experience of mental health problems or distress either personally, and/or as carers, family and kinship group members, were involved in the coideation and codesign of this research. All authors identify as people with lived experience.

摘要

背景

从历史上看,研究人员善于对研究对象进行研究,而不是与研究对象合作。这种方法往往不能有效地支持和惠及他们旨在服务的人群。本研究旨在探讨有过生活经历的人对参与研究的偏好,无论是作为研究中的研究参与者,还是通过积极参与心理健康研究。

方法

本文的数据来自于 2013 年至 2022 年期间进行的三项独立的生活经验设定议程研究;两次小组讨论和一次开放式在线调查。对数据进行了合并和主题分析。

结果

参与者描述了将生活经验纳入研究是至关重要的,这是心理健康研究中最高水平的知识和专长,应该导致知识的产生和研究议程。参与者讨论了使经验和故事得以分享的研究的重要性和价值,表达了对研究方法选择和代理的灵活性的需求,并支持在研究的所有阶段让更多有生活经验的人积极参与。参与者还谈到了需要从有生活经验的人那里获得视角和知识,使他们在研究中有平等的权力,在研究的多个方面为生活经验的声音留出空间,并更加尊重和认可生活经验的价值。

结论

心理健康研究中的生活经验正在崭露头角,但需要专门的、共同创造的发展才能使其正确。有生活经验的人越来越理解他们的经验知识给心理健康研究带来的价值,并描述了研究人员可以支持他们成为研究参与者并积极参与的广泛途径。权力共享、对生活经验的尊重和认可作为有效心理健康研究的核心是“保持真实”的关键。

患者或公众贡献

有心理健康问题或困扰的生活经历的个人,和/或作为照顾者、家庭和亲属群体成员,参与了这项研究的共同构思和共同设计。所有作者都认为自己是有生活经验的人。

相似文献

1
'Keeping it real': A qualitative exploration of preferences of people with lived experience for participation and active involvement in mental health research in Australia.“保持真实”:澳大利亚有过精神健康问题经历的人对参与和积极投入精神健康研究的偏好的定性探索。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13934. doi: 10.1111/hex.13934.
2
Qualitative Study定性研究
3
An Application of Evidence-Based Approaches to Engage Young People in the Design of a Global Mental Health Databank.循证方法在全球精神卫生数据库设计中吸引年轻人参与的应用。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e14172. doi: 10.1111/hex.14172.
4
Types and aspects of support that young carers need and value, and barriers and enablers to access: the REBIAS-YC qualitative study.年轻照顾者需要和重视的支持类型和方面,以及获得支持的障碍和促进因素:REBIAS-YC 定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(36):1-108. doi: 10.3310/ABAT6761.
5
The Social and Emotional Impact of Involving Individuals With Mental Illness in the Research Process.让精神疾病患者参与研究过程的社会和情感影响。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Sep;29(11):1634-1640. doi: 10.1177/1049732319837232. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
6
Enhancing Research Involvement of Young People With Lived Expertise: Reflecting on Experiences in Digital Mental Health Research.增强具有实践经验的年轻人的研究参与度:反思数字心理健康研究中的经验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e55441. doi: 10.2196/55441.
7
A systematic scoping review exploring how people with lived experience have been involved in prison and forensic mental health research.一项系统的范围综述,旨在探讨有过生活经历的人如何参与监狱和法医心理健康研究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2024 Feb;34(1):94-114. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2324. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
8
Discussing the gaps in the science and practice of lived experience engagement in mental health and substance use research: results of knowledge mobilization activities.探讨心理健康与物质使用研究中生活经历参与的科学与实践差距:知识传播活动的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 10;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00554-6.
9
Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda.澳大利亚精神健康研究重点:以消费者和照顾者为中心的议程。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 12;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0395-9.
10
A qualitative exploration of the psychosocial needs of people living with long-term conditions and their perspectives on online peer support.对长期患病者的社会心理需求及其对在线同伴支持看法的定性探索。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):2075-2088. doi: 10.1111/hex.13814. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Voices for change: inclusion of lived experience self-injury research, practice, education, and advocacy.变革之声:纳入自伤经历的研究、实践、教育与宣传。
Aust J Psychol. 2025 Feb 2;77(1):2456728. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2456728. eCollection 2025.
2
The Coproduced Youth Priorities Project: Australian Youth Priorities for Mental Health and Substance Use Prevention Research.共同制定的青年优先事项项目:澳大利亚青年对心理健康和物质使用预防研究的优先事项
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70274. doi: 10.1111/hex.70274.
3
Gym and swim: a co-facilitated exercise program that improves community connection, confidence, and exercise habits in a community mental health service.健身房与游泳:一项联合开展的锻炼计划,可改善社区心理健康服务中的社区联系、自信心和锻炼习惯。
Discov Ment Health. 2024 Nov 11;4(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00110-4.
4
Partnership between a consumer-led mental health research network and a large mental health research organisation: an Australian mixed methods case study.一个由消费者主导的心理健康研究网络与一个大型心理健康研究组织之间的合作关系:一项澳大利亚混合方法案例研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 7;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00645-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Reflections on patient engagement by patient partners: how it can go wrong.患者合作伙伴对患者参与的反思:可能出现的问题。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 12;9(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00454-1.
2
Co-ideation and co-design in co-creation research: Reflections from the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' project.共同创造研究中的共同构思和共同设计:来自“共同创造安全空间”项目的思考。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1738-1745. doi: 10.1111/hex.13785. Epub 2023 May 31.
3
Understanding the identity of lived experience researchers and providers: a conceptual framework and systematic narrative review.了解生活经验研究者和提供者的身份:一个概念框架和系统的叙述性综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 24;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00439-0.
4
Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities.保持议程的时效性:澳大利亚生活体验心理健康研究重点的演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138101.
5
Virtual World Café Method for Identifying Mental Health Research Priorities: Methodological Case Study.虚拟世界咖啡馆方法在确定精神健康研究重点中的应用:方法学案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 28;19(1):291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010291.
6
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
7
Perspectives: involving persons with lived experience of mental health conditions in service delivery, development and leadership.观点:让有心理健康问题亲身经历的人参与服务提供、发展和领导工作。
BJPsych Bull. 2022 Jun;46(3):160-164. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2021.51.
8
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.准备患者合作:患者伙伴参与和评估研究的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities.患者利益相关者参与研究:描述基础原则和最佳实践活动的叙述性综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):307-316. doi: 10.1111/hex.12873. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
10
Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda.澳大利亚精神健康研究重点:以消费者和照顾者为中心的议程。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 12;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0395-9.