• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不让任何人掉队:营养公平框架的理论与实践

Holding no-one back: The Nutrition Equity Framework in theory and practice.

作者信息

Nisbett Nicholas, Harris Jody, Backholer Kathryn, Baker Philip, Jernigan Valarie Blue Bird, Friel Sharon

机构信息

Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, UK.

World Vegetable Centre, Thailand.

出版信息

Glob Food Sec. 2022 Mar;32. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100605. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100605
PMID:36873709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9983632/
Abstract

Equity remains poorly conceptualised in current nutrition frameworks and policy approaches. We draw on existing literatures to present a novel Nutrition Equity Framework (NEF) that can be used to identify priorities for nutrition research and action. The framework illustrates how social and political processes structure the food, health and care environments most important to nutrition. Central to the framework are processes of unfairness, injustice and exclusion as the engine of nutrition inequity across place, time and generations, ultimately influencing both nutritional status and people's space to act. The NEF illustrates conceptually how action on the socio-political determinants of nutrition is the most fundamental and sustainable way of improving nutrition equity for everyone everywhere, through 'equity-sensitive nutrition'. Efforts must ensure, in the words of the Sustainable Development Goals, that not only is "no one left behind" but also that the inequities and injustices we describe do not hold anyone back from realising their right to healthy diets and good nutrition.

摘要

在当前的营养框架和政策方法中,公平性的概念仍未得到充分阐释。我们借鉴现有文献,提出了一个新颖的营养公平框架(NEF),可用于确定营养研究和行动的重点。该框架阐明了社会和政治进程如何构建对营养最为重要的食物、健康和护理环境。该框架的核心是不公平、不公正和排斥的过程,这些是跨越地域、时间和代际的营养不平等的驱动力,最终影响营养状况和人们采取行动的空间。营养公平框架从概念上说明了,通过“对公平敏感的营养”,针对营养的社会政治决定因素采取行动是改善各地所有人营养公平的最根本和可持续的方式。必须按照可持续发展目标的要求做出努力,确保不仅“不让任何人掉队”,而且我们所描述的不平等和不公正不会阻碍任何人实现其获得健康饮食和良好营养的权利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c1a/9983632/d5dfa64ad327/nihms-1876386-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c1a/9983632/d5dfa64ad327/nihms-1876386-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c1a/9983632/d5dfa64ad327/nihms-1876386-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Holding no-one back: The Nutrition Equity Framework in theory and practice.不让任何人掉队:营养公平框架的理论与实践
Glob Food Sec. 2022 Mar;32. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100605. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
2
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
3
Scoping review: national monitoring frameworks for social determinants of health and health equity.范围审查:健康的社会决定因素和健康公平性的国家监测框架
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 5;9:28831. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.28831. eCollection 2016.
4
Equity in agriculture-nutrition-health research: a scoping review.农业-营养-健康研究中的公平性:范围综述。
Nutr Rev. 2021 Dec 8;80(1):78-90. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab001.
5
Equity, food security and health equity in the Asia Pacific region.亚太地区的公平、粮食安全与健康公平
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2009;18(4):620-32.
6
The impact and importance of place on health for young people of Pasifika descent in Queensland, Australia: a qualitative study towards developing meaningful health equity indicators.澳大利亚昆士兰州太平洋岛裔年轻人的居住环境对其健康的影响和重要性:制定有意义的健康公平指标的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0978-2.
7
Tuberculosis结核病
8
Towards a global monitoring system for implementing the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health: developing a core set of indicators for government action on the social determinants of health to improve health equity.建立实施《关于社会决定因素的健康问题的里约政治宣言》全球监测系统:制定一套核心指标,供政府采取行动改善健康公平,应对社会决定因素对健康的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 5;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0836-7.
9
Towards Health Equity and Transformative Action on tribal health (THETA) study to describe, explain and act on tribal health inequities in India: A health systems research study protocol.迈向印度部落健康公平与变革性行动(THETA)研究:描述、解释印度部落健康不平等现象并采取行动的卫生系统研究方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Dec 13;4:202. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15549.1. eCollection 2019.
10
Equity consideration in palliative care policies, programs, and evaluation: an analysis of selected federal and South Australian documents.在姑息治疗政策、计划和评估中的公平性考虑:对选定的联邦和南澳大利亚文件的分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jun 16;21(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00997-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to: Beyond hunger: The health costs of Canada's charitable food model.回应:超越饥饿:加拿大慈善食品模式的健康成本
Can J Public Health. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01103-8.
2
Social Determinants of the Transition in Food Consumption in Paraíba, Brazil, Between 2008 and 2018.2008年至2018年巴西帕拉伊巴食品消费转变的社会决定因素
Nutrients. 2025 Aug 4;17(15):2550. doi: 10.3390/nu17152550.
3
Maternal Mental Health and Child Dietary Diversity in Rural Kenya: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 2 Baseline Studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Equity in agriculture-nutrition-health research: a scoping review.农业-营养-健康研究中的公平性:范围综述。
Nutr Rev. 2021 Dec 8;80(1):78-90. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab001.
2
The Basic Determinants of Malnutrition: Resources, Structures, Ideas and Power.营养不良的基本决定因素:资源、结构、观念和权力。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):817-827. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.259.
3
Addressing Malnutrition: The Importance of Political Economy Analysis of Power.解决营养不良问题:权力的政治经济学分析的重要性。
肯尼亚农村地区的孕产妇心理健康与儿童饮食多样性:两项基线研究的汇总分析结果
Curr Dev Nutr. 2025 Jun 24;9(7):107497. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107497. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
The Maternal Capital Hypothesis: Giving Mothers Central Place in Evolutionary Perspectives on Developmental Plasticity and Health.母性资本假说:在发育可塑性与健康的进化视角中赋予母亲核心地位。
Am J Hum Biol. 2025 Jun;37(6):e70084. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.70084.
5
Can nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions address intersectional inequalities in women's diets? A mediation analysis using cross-sectional trial data from Odisha, India.营养敏感型农业干预措施能否解决女性饮食中的交叉不平等问题?一项使用印度奥里萨邦横断面试验数据的中介分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Aug;122(2):460-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.05.027. Epub 2025 May 29.
6
Socioeconomic status and older adult's experiences of weight loss: a qualitative secondary analysis.社会经济地位与老年人的减肥经历:一项定性二次分析
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 22;20(4):e0321313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321313. eCollection 2025.
7
Racial Disparities in Birth and Lactation Outcomes Among Neonates with Congenital Heart Defects at a Regional Mid-Atlantic Heart Center.大西洋中部地区心脏中心先天性心脏病新生儿出生及哺乳结局的种族差异
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02390-0.
8
Global Perspectives on Obesity and Being Overweight: A Bibliometric Analysis in Relation to Sustainable Development Goals.全球肥胖与超重问题视角:与可持续发展目标相关的文献计量分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 22;22(2):146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020146.
9
Equalising power imbalances or a trail of broken promises? A qualitative study on engaging people with diverse lived experience of marginalisation in food policymaking in Australia.平衡权力失衡还是一连串的失信承诺?一项关于让澳大利亚具有不同边缘化生活经历的人参与食品政策制定的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21733-4.
10
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Community Suicide Database and Prevention Program in Diverse Tribal Communities.在不同部落社区实施社区自杀数据库及预防项目的促进因素与障碍
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 3;21(12):1616. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121616.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):809-816. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.250.
4
What would it take for health promotion to take structural racism seriously?要让健康促进切实重视结构性种族主义,需要具备哪些条件?
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Dec;27(4):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1757975920972259.
5
Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review.企业权力与国际贸易体制阻碍针对非传染性疾病采取渐进式政策行动:一项现实主义综述
Health Policy Plan. 2021 May 17;36(4):493-508. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa148.
6
First-food systems transformations and the ultra-processing of infant and young child diets: The determinants, dynamics and consequences of the global rise in commercial milk formula consumption.早期食物系统转型与婴幼儿饮食的超加工:全球商业配方奶粉消费增长的决定因素、动态变化及后果。
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Apr;17(2):e13097. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13097. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
7
Redressing the Corporate Cultivation of Consumption: Releasing the Weapons of the Structurally Weak.扭转消费的企业文化培养:释放结构性弱者的力量。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):784-792. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.205.
8
Differential exposure to, and potential impact of, unhealthy advertising to children by socio-economic and ethnic groups: A systematic review of the evidence.社会经济和种族群体之间儿童接触不良广告的差异,以及这种差异对儿童的潜在影响:系统评价证据。
Obes Rev. 2021 Mar;22(3):e13144. doi: 10.1111/obr.13144. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
9
First Nations Peoples' Participation in the Development of Population-Wide Food and Nutrition Policy in Australia: A Political Economy and Cultural Safety Analysis.第一民族人民参与澳大利亚全民食物和营养政策的制定:政治经济学和文化安全分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):871-885. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.175.
10
An overview of the commercial determinants of health.商业健康决定因素概述。
Global Health. 2020 Aug 17;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00607-x.