• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与青少年共同创建一个适应健康睡眠干预措施的过程中的经验:一项健康级联过程评估。

Experiences with a co-creation process to adapt a healthy sleep intervention with adolescents: A Health CASCADE process evaluation.

作者信息

Delfmann Lea Rahel, de Boer Janneke, Schreier Margrit, Messiha Katrina, Deforche Benedicte, Hunter Simon C, Cardon Greet, Vandendriessche Ann, Verloigne Maïté

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Campus UZ Ghent, Entrance 42, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Campus UZ Ghent, Entrance 42, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Public Health. 2025 Apr;241:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.006. Epub 2025 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.006
PMID:39954590
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Co-adaptation is a collaborative process to adapt existing interventions to new contexts and offers a promising way to scale (co-created) public health interventions. However, there is limited understanding of how co-adaptation processes are experienced. This study examined whether a robust co-creation process can be maintained when adapting a previously co-created intervention to promote adolescents' healthy sleep. Adolescents' experiences during this co-adaptation process were explored, using five key dimensions of co-creation (1) multistakeholder collaborative action, 2) co-learning towards innovation, 3) contextual knowledge production, 4) generating meaning, 5) open, trustful, and inclusive dialogue) as the guiding framework.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative observational study.

METHODS

Qualitative data were collected from a co-adaptation process with an action group of adolescents (n = 8) and researchers (n = 2). Over eleven sessions (50 min) following Intervention Mapping, a needs assessment was conducted, and the original intervention's goals and materials were adapted. Data sources included session transcripts, facilitator reflections, adolescent evaluations (n = 5), and focus group transcripts (n = 3), elaborating on adolescents' experiences during sessions, and were analysed using Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA).

RESULTS

All five dimensions of co-creation were reflected in adolescents' experiences of co-adapting the healthy sleep intervention. They enjoyed collaborating, committed to the project, reported ongoing possibilities for learning, and produced contextual knowledge from their lived experiences. The process felt meaningful, with a respectful atmosphere. However, challenges like the exclusion of students outside the group and time constraints were also encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of the five dimensions of co-creation in this study demonstrates that robust co-creation research can be maintained also when co-adapting a previously co-created intervention to a new context with a new group of stakeholders.

摘要

目标

共同适应是一个将现有干预措施适用于新环境的协作过程,为扩大(共同创建的)公共卫生干预措施提供了一条很有前景的途径。然而,对于共同适应过程的体验了解有限。本研究探讨了在调整先前共同创建的促进青少年健康睡眠的干预措施时,是否能够维持一个强有力的共同创建过程。利用共同创建的五个关键维度(1)多利益相关方协作行动,2)朝着创新共同学习,3)情境知识生成,4)产生意义,5)开放、信任和包容的对话)作为指导框架,探索了青少年在这一共同适应过程中的经历。

研究设计

定性观察研究。

方法

从与一个青少年行动小组(n = 8)和研究人员(n = 2)的共同适应过程中收集定性数据。在干预映射之后的十一次会议(每次50分钟)中,进行了需求评估,并对原始干预措施的目标和材料进行了调整。数据来源包括会议记录、主持人反思、青少年评估(n = 5)和焦点小组记录(n = 3),阐述了青少年在会议期间的经历,并使用定性内容分析(QCA)进行了分析。

结果

共同创建的所有五个维度都反映在青少年对健康睡眠干预措施的共同适应经历中。他们喜欢合作,致力于该项目,报告了持续的学习可能性,并从他们的生活经历中生成了情境知识。这个过程感觉很有意义,氛围也很融洽。然而,也遇到了一些挑战,比如小组外学生被排除在外以及时间限制。

结论

本研究中共同创建的五个维度的存在表明,当将先前共同创建的干预措施与新的利益相关方群体一起适用于新环境时,也能够维持强有力的共同创建研究。

相似文献

1
Experiences with a co-creation process to adapt a healthy sleep intervention with adolescents: A Health CASCADE process evaluation.与青少年共同创建一个适应健康睡眠干预措施的过程中的经验:一项健康级联过程评估。
Public Health. 2025 Apr;241:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.006. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
2
The Dilemmas and Opportunities of Co-Creating Health Interventions to Fit Local Contexts: An Ethnographic Study on the Adaptation of Clinical Guidelines in Tanzania.在契合当地背景的情况下共同创建卫生干预措施所面临的困境和机遇:坦桑尼亚临床指南改编的民族志研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70073. doi: 10.1111/hex.70073.
3
Exploring co-adaptation for public health interventions: insights from a rapid review and interviews.探索公共卫生干预措施的协同适应:快速综述与访谈的见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21544-7.
4
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
5
School staff experiences on involvement in a co-creation process: a Health CASCADE scoping review and thematic synthesis.学校工作人员参与共创过程的经历:一项健康级联范围审查和主题综合分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):916. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22063-1.
6
Cadê o Kauê? Co-design and acceptability testing of a chat-story aimed at enhancing youth participation in the promotion of mental health in Brazil.考埃在哪里?一项旨在提高巴西青年参与心理健康促进的聊天故事的共同设计与可接受性测试。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 May;66(5):697-715. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14078. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
7
Nyakaza-Move-for-Health: A Culturally Tailored Physical Activity Intervention for Adolescents in South Africa Using the Intervention Mapping Protocol.尼亚卡扎健康行动:一项使用干预映射协议为南非青少年量身定制的体育活动干预措施。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241278849. doi: 10.1177/21501319241278849.
8
A comparison of office workers' co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study.办公室职员共同创造体验的比较:一项健康级联多案例研究。
Public Health. 2025 Apr;241:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.034. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
9
Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions.公共卫生干预措施共同生产与原型制作框架的开发。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 4;17(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4695-8.
10
Adolescents as food designers: The value of co-creation for the development of healthy dairy products.青少年作为食品设计师:共同创造对健康乳制品开发的价值。
Food Res Int. 2025 Jan;200:115455. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115455. Epub 2024 Nov 29.