• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系中的效益成本关系:伙伴关系成功测量方法(MAPS)研究的结果

Understanding the Benefit-Cost Relationship in Long-standing Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: Findings from the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Study.

作者信息

Lachance Laurie, Coombe Chris M, Brush Barbara L, Lee Shoou-Yih Daniel, Jensen Megan, Taffe Brianna, Bhardwaj Prachi, Muhammad Michael, Wilson-Powers Eliza, Rowe Zachary, Caldwell Cleopatra H, Israel Barbara A

机构信息

University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, 1415 Washington Heights; Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.

University of Michigan School of Nursing, Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, 426 North Ingalls Building; Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2003, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Sci. 2022 Sep;58(3):513-536. doi: 10.1177/0021886320972193. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1177/0021886320972193
PMID:36016649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9398184/
Abstract

As part of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study, we investigated the relationship between benefits and costs of participation in long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships using social exchange theory as a theoretical framework. Three major findings were identified: (1) the concept of benefits and costs operating as a ratio, where individual benefits must outweigh costs for participation, applies to early stages of CBPR partnership formation; (2) as CBPR partnerships develop, the benefits and costs of participation include each other's needs and the needs of the group as a whole; and (3) there is a shift in the relationship of benefits and costs over time in long-standing CBPR partnerships, in which partners no longer think in terms of costs but rather investments that contribute to mutual benefits.

摘要

作为合作成功衡量方法(MAPS)研究的一部分,我们以社会交换理论为理论框架,调查了长期基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)合作中参与的收益与成本之间的关系。我们确定了三个主要发现:(1)收益与成本的概念以比率形式运作,即个人参与的收益必须超过成本,这适用于CBPR合作形成的早期阶段;(2)随着CBPR合作的发展,参与的收益和成本包括彼此的需求以及整个群体的需求;(3)在长期的CBPR合作中,收益与成本的关系会随着时间推移而发生转变,合作伙伴不再从成本角度思考,而是从有助于互利的投资角度思考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7581/9398184/39889c992721/nihms-1684053-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7581/9398184/39889c992721/nihms-1684053-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7581/9398184/39889c992721/nihms-1684053-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the Benefit-Cost Relationship in Long-standing Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: Findings from the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Study.理解长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系中的效益成本关系:伙伴关系成功测量方法(MAPS)研究的结果
J Appl Behav Sci. 2022 Sep;58(3):513-536. doi: 10.1177/0021886320972193. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success: Theory and Methods for Measuring Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.衡量伙伴关系成功的方法:长期社区为基础的参与式研究伙伴关系成功的衡量理论与方法。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):129-140. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0015.
3
Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review.长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系的成功:范围文献综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):556-568. doi: 10.1177/1090198119882989. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
A Participatory, Mixed Methods Approach to Define and Measure Partnership Synergy in Long-standing Equity-focused CBPR Partnerships.一种参与式、混合方法,用于定义和衡量长期以公平为重点的 CBPR 伙伴关系中的伙伴关系协同作用。
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Dec;66(3-4):427-438. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12447. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Cultivating an Ecosystem: A Qualitative Exploration of Sustainability in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.培育一个生态系统:对长期基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中的可持续性进行定性探索。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(3):393-404.
6
The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire and Facilitation Guide: A Validated Measure of CBPR Partnership Success.伙伴关系成功的衡量方法(MAPS)问卷及促进指南:一种经验证的社区参与性研究伙伴关系成功的衡量工具。
Health Promot Pract. 2024 Nov;25(6):956-962. doi: 10.1177/15248399231206088. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
7
Validation of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire.验证伴侣关系成功的测量方法(MAPS)问卷。
Health Educ Behav. 2024 Apr;51(2):218-228. doi: 10.1177/10901981231213352. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.基于社区参与式研究的现实主义评价:伙伴关系协同效应、信任建立及相关连锁反应。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
9
Using a CBPR Approach to Guide Successful Recruitment for an Online Questionnaire: The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Case Study.运用社区参与式研究方法指导在线问卷的成功招募:伙伴关系成功的测量方法(MAPS)案例研究
Health Promot Pract. 2025 Mar;26(2):205-208. doi: 10.1177/15248399231211532. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
10
Methodological Reflections of a Student- and Community-based Partnership on Operationalizing a Community-based Participatory Research Model: Recommendations for Building, Securing, and Sustaining Partnerships.学生和社区伙伴关系在实施基于社区的参与式研究模型方面的方法学反思:建立、保障和维持伙伴关系的建议。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(3):401-409. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0056.

引用本文的文献

1
The health for hearts united dissemination Trial: Implementation costs to reduce cardiovascular risk in African Americans.心脏联合健康传播试验:降低非裔美国人心血管风险的实施成本
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Jun 26;10:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100633. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
A short pragmatic tool for evaluating community engagement: Partnering for Health Improvement and Research Equity.一种用于评估社区参与度的简短实用工具:促进健康改善与研究公平的伙伴关系。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1539864. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539864. eCollection 2025.
3
Improving Community-Engaged Implementation Science: Perspectives From "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Award Cases in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success: Theory and Methods for Measuring Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.衡量伙伴关系成功的方法:长期社区为基础的参与式研究伙伴关系成功的衡量理论与方法。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):129-140. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0015.
2
Meaningful Engagement in Research: Community Residents as Co-creators of Knowledge.有意义的研究参与:社区居民作为知识共创者。
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Jun;65(3-4):261-271. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12414. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review.
改进社区参与式实施科学:来自美国“终结艾滋病流行”补充奖励案例的视角
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Apr 15;98(5S):e38-e47. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003618.
4
Community-Engaged Research in HIV Implementation Science: Characterizing Academic and Community Partnerships in the "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Awards.社区参与的艾滋病病毒实施科学研究:“终结艾滋病流行”补充奖中学术与社区伙伴关系的特征分析
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Apr 15;98(5S):e28-e37. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003633.
5
Exploration of trust in participatory health research partnerships across two timepoints: a network approach.跨两个时间点对参与式健康研究伙伴关系中的信任进行探索:一种网络方法。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e088355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088355.
6
Developing a mobile application for gender-affirming voice training: A community-engaged approach.开发一款用于性别确认语音训练的移动应用程序:一种社区参与式方法。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Dec 14;9(6):e70043. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70043. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Cultivating an Ecosystem: A Qualitative Exploration of Sustainability in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.培育生态系统:对长期社区为基础的参与式研究伙伴关系可持续性的定性探索。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(3):e5.
8
Aligning clinical research ethics with community-engaged and participatory research in the United States.将临床研究伦理与美国的社区参与和参与式研究相结合。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 4;11:1122479. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1122479. eCollection 2023.
9
Toward the economic evaluation of participatory approaches in health promotion: lessons from four German physical activity promotion projects.迈向健康促进中参与式方法的经济评估:来自四个德国身体活动促进项目的经验教训。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii79-ii92. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab158.
长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系的成功:范围文献综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):556-568. doi: 10.1177/1090198119882989. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Shifting from "Community-Placed" to "Community-Based" Research to Advance Health Equity: A Case Study of the Heatwaves, Housing, and Health: Increasing Climate Resiliency in Detroit (HHH) Partnership.从“社区安置”到“社区为基础”的研究转变,以促进健康公平:以底特律热浪、住房和健康:提高气候适应能力(HHH)伙伴关系为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 9;16(18):3310. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183310.
5
Preventing Neighborhood Disorder: Comparing Alternative Models of Collective Efficacy Theory Using Structural Equation Modeling.预防邻里失序:使用结构方程模型比较集体效能理论的替代模型。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;63(1-2):168-178. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12317. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model.参与式健康研究的影响:对基于社区的参与式研究概念模型的检验。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 24;2018:7281405. doi: 10.1155/2018/7281405. eCollection 2018.
7
Measuring Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: The Initial Development of an Assessment Instrument.衡量基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系:一种评估工具的初步开发。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Winter;9(4):549-60. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0077.
8
Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.
9
A diagnostic evaluation model for complex research partnerships with community engagement: the partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention (NACP) model.一种用于具有社区参与的复杂研究伙伴关系的诊断评估模型:美国原住民癌症预防伙伴关系(NACP)模型。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Feb;48:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
10
Sense of community responsibility in community collaboratives: advancing a theory of community as resource and responsibility.社区合作中的社区责任感:推进将社区视为资源和责任的理论
Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Dec;54(3-4):229-42. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9667-x.