• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

unpaid dementia caregivers:一项为期2年的混合方法探索性研究方案

Resilience-promoting social networks among unpaid dementia caregivers: protocol for a mixed-methods, 2-year exploratory study.

作者信息

Peckham Allie, Guest M Aaron, Pituch Keenan, Hook Jane, Mporanyi Marlene Umubyeyi, Sadow Sage

机构信息

Center for Innovation in Healthy and Resilient Aging, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Center for Innovation in Healthy and Resilient Aging, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e090528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090528.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090528
PMID:39956592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11831260/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia often experience lower levels of perceived life satisfaction and higher rates of depression and anxiety compared with those caring for individuals without Alzheimer's disease or related dementias. While research on unpaid caregiver well-being and satisfaction has primarily focused on the characteristics of people living with dementia and their dyadic relationships, it has not adequately explored the role of social networks in supporting unpaid caregiver well-being. In this study, we aim to fill this gap by taking an egocentric social network approach to understand the multiple dimensions of social relations among unpaid caregivers of people living with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a mixed-method, 2-year exploratory study that involves a structured survey-based telephone interview in year 1 and semistructured interviews in year 2 with caregivers of PLWD recruited through community and healthcare partners. Participants will participate in 1 60-min interview in year 1 (n=100) and a 45-60 min semistructured interview in year 2 (n=75). Eligibility for caregivers includes being an unpaid caregiver, aged 40 years or older, residing and providing care in Arizona or Nevada. The survey consists of questions about caregiver and care recipient demographics, caregiver background, caregiver stress, resilience, well-being and egocentric social network data. Network composition attributes, such as tie strength, the function of the relationship and reliance on network members, will also be assessed. In year 2, qualitative semistructured interviews will supplement these quantitative measures to understand network selection, perceived network changes over time and network strength.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Arizona State Institutional Review Board (00018191) approved this study. All participants will receive electronic informed consent documents to review and sign. During the initial interview, participants will be asked if they have any questions about the informed consent documents. We will confirm that participants have completed the required consent form before the start of any research activity. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles, academic and community presentations, and community-focused publications targeting caregivers.

摘要

引言

与照顾没有阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆症患者的人相比,痴呆症患者的无偿照护者往往感受到较低的生活满意度,且抑郁和焦虑发生率更高。虽然关于无偿照护者幸福感和满意度的研究主要集中在痴呆症患者的特征及其二元关系上,但尚未充分探讨社交网络在支持无偿照护者幸福感方面的作用。在本研究中,我们旨在通过采用以自我为中心的社交网络方法来填补这一空白,以了解阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆症患者的无偿照护者之间社会关系的多个维度。

方法与分析

我们将开展一项为期两年的混合方法探索性研究,第一年进行基于结构化调查的电话访谈,第二年对通过社区和医疗合作伙伴招募的痴呆症患者照护者进行半结构化访谈。参与者将在第一年参加一次60分钟的访谈(n = 100),在第二年参加一次45 - 60分钟的半结构化访谈(n = 75)。照护者的入选条件包括为无偿照护者、年龄40岁及以上、居住在亚利桑那州或内华达州并提供照护。该调查包括有关照护者和受照护者人口统计学、照护者背景、照护者压力、恢复力、幸福感以及以自我为中心的社交网络数据的问题。还将评估网络组成属性,如关系强度、关系功能以及对网络成员的依赖程度。在第二年,定性半结构化访谈将补充这些定量测量,以了解网络选择、随时间感知到的网络变化以及网络强度。

伦理与传播

亚利桑那州立大学机构审查委员会(00018191)批准了本研究。所有参与者将收到电子知情同意文件以供审查和签署。在初次访谈期间,将询问参与者是否对知情同意文件有任何疑问。在任何研究活动开始前,我们将确认参与者已完成所需的同意表格。本研究的结果将通过同行评审的期刊文章、学术和社区报告以及针对照护者的社区聚焦出版物进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b9/11831260/f93bc1ac5fcc/bmjopen-15-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b9/11831260/f93bc1ac5fcc/bmjopen-15-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b9/11831260/f93bc1ac5fcc/bmjopen-15-2-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Resilience-promoting social networks among unpaid dementia caregivers: protocol for a mixed-methods, 2-year exploratory study.unpaid dementia caregivers:一项为期2年的混合方法探索性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e090528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090528.
2
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
3
Family dynamics in dementia care: A phenomenological exploration of the experiences of family caregivers of relatives with dementia.痴呆症护理中的家庭动态:对痴呆症亲属的家庭照顾者的体验的现象学探索。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Dec;29(6):861-872. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12822. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
4
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.
5
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
6
Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses.由医疗保健专业人员进行的电话干预,旨在为患有确诊疾病的成年人的非正式护理人员提供教育和心理社会支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012533.pub2.
7
Social support, positive caregiving experience, and caregiver burden in informal caregivers of older adults with dementia.老年痴呆症患者非正式照护者的社会支持、积极的照护体验和照护者负担。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;11:1104250. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104250. eCollection 2023.
8
Who's On Your Team? Classifying Dementia Caregiving Networks and Associations With the Well-being of Caregivers and Care Recipients With Dementia.谁在你的团队中?对痴呆症护理网络进行分类以及与痴呆症护理者和护理接受者的福祉之间的关联。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 May 8;80(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf040.
9
Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT.辅助技术和远程监护以维持痴呆症患者的独立居家生活:ATTILA RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(19):1-156. doi: 10.3310/hta25190.
10
Perceptions and Utilization of Online Peer Support Among Informal Dementia Caregivers: Survey Study.非专业痴呆症照护者对在线同伴支持的认知和利用情况:调查研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 31;7:e55169. doi: 10.2196/55169.

本文引用的文献

1
Making Home: The Role of Social Networks on Identity, Health, and Quality of Life Among Rural Lesbian and Gay Older Adults.构建家园:社交网络对农村老年同性恋者身份认同、健康及生活质量的作用
Innov Aging. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):igad082. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad082. eCollection 2023.
2
Socioemotional Selectivity Theory: The Role of Perceived Endings in Human Motivation.社会情绪选择理论:感知终点在人类动机中的作用。
Gerontologist. 2021 Nov 15;61(8):1188-1196. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab116.
3
Network Canvas: Key decisions in the design of an interviewer assisted network data collection software suite.
网络画布:访谈者辅助网络数据收集软件套件设计中的关键决策
Soc Networks. 2021 Jul;66:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Best Practices for Modeling Egocentric Social Network Data and Health Outcomes.自我中心社会网络数据建模与健康结果的最佳实践。
HERD. 2021 Oct;14(4):18-34. doi: 10.1177/19375867211013772. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
The Strength of Weaker Ties: An Underexplored Resource for Maintaining Emotional Well-Being in Later Life.弱关系的力量:一种在晚年维持情绪健康但未得到充分探索的资源。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Aug 13;75(7):1433-1442. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa019.
6
"It's More than Just Needing money": The Value of Supporting Networks of Care.“不仅仅是需要钱”:护理支持网络的价值
J Aging Soc Policy. 2021 May-Jun;33(3):201-221. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1685357. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
7
Impact of Caregiving for Dementia Patients on Healthcare Utilization of Caregivers.照顾痴呆患者对照顾者医疗保健利用情况的影响。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Sep 24;7(4):138. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7040138.
8
Social engagement before and after dementia diagnosis in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.痴呆症诊断前后的英国老龄化纵向研究中的社会参与。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220195. eCollection 2019.
9
The impact of relationship quality on life satisfaction and well-being in dementia caregiving dyads: findings from the IDEAL study.关系质量对痴呆症照护二元组中生活满意度和幸福感的影响:理想研究的结果
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Sep;24(9):1411-1420. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1617238. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Social network changes among older Europeans: the role of gender.欧洲老年人社交网络的变化:性别所起的作用。
Eur J Ageing. 2018 Jan 16;15(4):359-367. doi: 10.1007/s10433-017-0454-z. eCollection 2018 Dec.