Suppr超能文献

基于手工艺的干预措施对心理健康和幸福感的影响:一项系统综述。

The effects of crafts-based interventions on mental health and well-being: A systematic review.

作者信息

Bukhave Elise Bromann, Creek Jennifer, Linstad Anne Kirketerp, Frandsen Tove Faber

机构信息

University College Absalon, Naestved, Denmark.

Independent scholar, UK.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Feb;72(1):e70001. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70001.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A recent upsurge of interest in the health benefits of crafts for mental health and well-being has not been supported by systematic reviews of the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions, prior to this review.

METHODS

Five databases were searched: Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), Eric (EBSCO), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. No date limitations were applied. The search was carried out in January 2024 and supplemented by citation searches in June 2024.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 14,115 papers; the citation search produced 226 additional references. Nineteen studies in total met the inclusion criteria. Across the 19 studies, there is a wide variety of research designs and a range of crafts used as media for therapy. Interventions were delivered or supervised by either art therapists, nurses, or occupational therapists. Only nine studies report the theoretical basis for the intervention. Treatment duration varies from 10 min to 16 weeks. Quality assessment revealed the quality of the studies varies considerably, with some studies of high-quality and many suffering from methodological weaknesses. Common issues relating to risk of bias include failure to blind assessors; incomplete data and lack of clarity about how the intervention was administered. All the studies report short-term improvements in the outcomes measured, which include anxiety, stress, depression, interest in life, self-efficacy, social skills, sociability, mood, well-being, self-esteem, life satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and hopelessness. Due to the wide variation in interventions, research designs, outcomes, outcome measures, and research quality, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions.

CONCLUSION

There is some evidence that crafts-based interventions may benefit mental health and well-being, but more high-quality research is needed, including on the mechanisms through which crafts-based interventions operate.

CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

No consumer or community involvement.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Reports from the media suggest that doing crafts may improve mental health. Crafts are, for example, knitting, sewing, and pottery. Therapists have used crafts for years to treat mental illnesses. However, there is no strong proof that these treatments are effective for clients or worth the cost. This paper reviews the effects of craft-based treatments. The review found 19 studies that looked at whether people felt better after doing crafts. The participants included men and women with various physical, mental, and social problems. These issues included mental disorders, osteoarthritis, epilepsy, and dementia. Pottery, embroidery, knitting, papercraft, and woodwork were used. Some people did crafts for 10 min, while others had several sessions over weeks. All 19 studies showed that mood and life satisfaction improved after the treatment. But, only one study checked if these improvements lasted in the weeks after. It is encouraging to see that people feel better after doing crafts. But, these 19 studies together do not prove that the benefits last long-term. More research is needed to get clearer answers.

摘要

引言

在本次综述之前,对工艺活动对心理健康和幸福感有益的兴趣最近有所上升,但基于工艺的干预措施有效性的系统评价并未支持这一点。

方法

检索了五个数据库:Scopus、CINAHL(EBSCO)、APA PsycInfo(EBSCO)、Eric(EBSCO)和ProQuest学位论文数据库。未设置日期限制。检索于2024年1月进行,并在2024年6月通过引文检索进行补充。

结果

初步检索得到14115篇论文;引文检索又产生了226条参考文献。共有19项研究符合纳入标准。在这19项研究中,有各种各样的研究设计,并且有一系列工艺活动被用作治疗媒介。干预由艺术治疗师、护士或职业治疗师提供或监督。只有9项研究报告了干预的理论基础。治疗持续时间从10分钟到16周不等。质量评估显示,这些研究的质量差异很大,一些研究质量高,许多研究存在方法学缺陷。与偏倚风险相关的常见问题包括评估者未设盲;数据不完整以及干预实施方式缺乏清晰度。所有研究均报告了所测量结果的短期改善,这些结果包括焦虑、压力、抑郁、生活兴趣、自我效能感、社交技能、社交性、情绪、幸福感、自尊、生活满意度、健康相关生活质量和绝望感。由于干预措施、研究设计、结果、结果测量和研究质量差异很大,因此难以就基于工艺的干预措施的有效性得出确凿结论。

结论

有证据表明基于工艺的干预措施可能有益于心理健康和幸福感,但需要更多高质量的研究,包括对基于工艺的干预措施起作用的机制的研究。

消费者和社区参与情况

无消费者或社区参与。

通俗易懂的总结

媒体报道表明,进行工艺活动可能改善心理健康。工艺活动例如编织、缝纫和陶艺。治疗师多年来一直使用工艺活动治疗精神疾病。然而,没有有力证据表明这些治疗方法对患者有效或物有所值。本文综述了基于工艺的治疗方法的效果。该综述发现了19项研究,这些研究探讨了人们进行工艺活动后是否感觉更好。参与者包括患有各种身体、心理和社会问题的男性和女性。这些问题包括精神障碍、骨关节炎、癫痫和痴呆症。使用了陶艺、刺绣、编织、纸艺和木工。一些人进行10分钟的工艺活动,而另一些人在数周内进行了多次疗程。所有19项研究均表明治疗后情绪和生活满意度有所改善。但是,只有一项研究检查了这些改善在之后几周是否持续。看到人们进行工艺活动后感觉更好令人鼓舞。但是,这19项研究合在一起并未证明这些益处能长期持续。需要更多研究以获得更明确的答案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc5/11830576/099e364e15a8/AOT-72-0-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验