• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三级护理教学医院中精神科临床评定量表的应用:自然环境下的回顾性描述性研究

Utilization of Psychiatric Clinical Rating Scales in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: A Retrospective Descriptive Study in a Naturalistic Setting.

作者信息

Ranganathan Pranesh Ram, Ramasamy Sureshkumar

机构信息

Dept. of Psychiatry, Swamy Vivekanandha Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Tiruchengode, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India.

Dept. of Psychiatry, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Feb 12:02537176241310942. doi: 10.1177/02537176241310942.

DOI:10.1177/02537176241310942
PMID:39957795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11822780/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Considering the importance of clinical rating scales in psychiatric evaluation and their academic relevance, this study assessed the extent to which they were utilized in a tertiary care teaching hospital during patients' hospital stays.

METHODS

We did a consecutive sampling of patients' records and retrieved data from medical records of the patients admitted with the diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder (BPAD), and depressive disorder in the psychiatry wards. Data regarding the use of clinical rating scales (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)) each week was collected and analyzed accordingly.

RESULTS

Out of 50 case records retrieved, the majority (60%) were male. The sample mean age was 37.76 ± 12.78 years. Forty percent of the sample records had schizophrenia, 38% had BPAD-mania, and 22% had depressive disorders. The sample had an average inpatient hospital stay of 17.68 ± 8.25 days. At baseline, only 54% were administered respective clinical rating scales. At the end of the first week, 42% were assessed using clinical rating scales. At the end of the second and third weeks, only 35.9.1% and 13.3% of patients were monitored by rating scales, and the utilization rate declined further, with a downward slump in subsequent weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of clinical rating scales was found to be low in our tertiary care teaching hospital. Postgraduate trainees need more exposure and formal training in applying psychiatric rating scales for better patient care.

摘要

背景

鉴于临床评定量表在精神病学评估中的重要性及其学术相关性,本研究评估了在一家三级护理教学医院中,患者住院期间这些量表的使用程度。

方法

我们对患者记录进行连续抽样,并从精神科病房收治的诊断为精神分裂症、双相情感障碍(BPAD)和抑郁症的患者病历中检索数据。每周收集并分析有关临床评定量表(简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、杨氏躁狂评定量表(YMRS)或汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS))使用情况的数据。

结果

在检索到的50份病例记录中,大多数(60%)为男性。样本平均年龄为37.76±12.78岁。40%的样本记录为精神分裂症,38%为BPAD-躁狂发作,22%为抑郁症。样本的平均住院天数为17.68±8.25天。在基线时,只有54%的患者接受了相应的临床评定量表评估。在第一周结束时,42%的患者使用临床评定量表进行了评估。在第二周和第三周结束时,分别只有35.9%和13.3%的患者通过评定量表进行监测,利用率进一步下降,在随后几周出现大幅下滑。

结论

在我们的三级护理教学医院中,临床评定量表的使用率较低。研究生学员需要更多接触并接受应用精神病学评定量表的正规培训,以便更好地为患者提供护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf0/11822780/146914c77e57/10.1177_02537176241310942-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf0/11822780/643bfd5a060d/10.1177_02537176241310942-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf0/11822780/146914c77e57/10.1177_02537176241310942-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf0/11822780/643bfd5a060d/10.1177_02537176241310942-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf0/11822780/146914c77e57/10.1177_02537176241310942-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization of Psychiatric Clinical Rating Scales in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: A Retrospective Descriptive Study in a Naturalistic Setting.三级护理教学医院中精神科临床评定量表的应用:自然环境下的回顾性描述性研究
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Feb 12:02537176241310942. doi: 10.1177/02537176241310942.
2
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.重度抑郁症的新型强化治疗策略
Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).
3
Evaluating response to mood stabilizers in patients with mixed depression: A study of agreement between three different mania rating scales and a depression rating scale.评估混合性抑郁症患者对心境稳定剂的反应:一项关于三种不同躁狂评定量表与一种抑郁评定量表之间一致性的研究。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jun;197:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.064. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Comparison of Formal Thought Disorder in the Acute Episode of Schizophrenia and Manic Episode of Bipolar Affective Disorder.精神分裂症急性发作与双相情感障碍躁狂发作时形式思维障碍的比较
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2022 Winter;33(4):223-232. doi: 10.5080/u25886.
5
Resilience in severe mental disorders: correlations to clinical measures and quality of life in hospitalized patients with major depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.严重精神障碍的韧性:与住院的重性抑郁症、双相情感障碍和精神分裂症患者的临床指标和生活质量的相关性。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Feb;31(2):507-516. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02920-3. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
6
Quetiapine decreases alcohol consumption, craving, and psychiatric symptoms in dually diagnosed alcoholics.喹硫平可减少同时患有酒精使用障碍和精神疾病的患者的酒精摄入量、酒瘾及精神症状。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jul;23(5):417-24. doi: 10.1002/hup.944.
7
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.
8
Transcultural adaption and validation of the Spanish version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS-S).《双相抑郁评定量表》西班牙语版(BDRS-S)的跨文化调适与验证
J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
9
Does the efficacy of asenapine in bipolar disorder increase in the presence of comorbidity with a substance use disorder? A naturalistic study.阿塞那平在双相情感障碍合并物质使用障碍时的疗效是否会增加?一项自然主义研究。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2017 Feb;7(2):67-77. doi: 10.1177/2045125316674698. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
10
Uric Acid as a Biomarker for Mood Disorders: A Comparative Study of Blood Uric Acid Levels Correlating With the Symptom Severity and Treatment Response.尿酸作为情绪障碍的生物标志物:一项关于血尿酸水平与症状严重程度及治疗反应相关性的比较研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 13;16(8):e66784. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66784. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing Measurement-Based Care for Depression: Practical Solutions for Psychiatrists and Primary Care Physicians.实施基于测量的抑郁症护理:精神科医生和初级保健医生的实用解决方案。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Jan 14;17:79-90. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S283731. eCollection 2021.
2
Dual Diagnosis and Application Problems in the Use of the Construct: A Review of Literature.双重诊断与该概念使用中的应用问题:文献综述
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020 Mar;208(3):181-189. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001092.
3
Changes in mindfulness facets in a dialectical behaviour therapy skills training group program for borderline personality disorder.
辩证行为治疗技能训练团体方案对边缘型人格障碍的正念各维度的影响。
J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jun;75(6):958-969. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22744. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
4
Using Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Any Treatment.运用基于测量的护理来强化任何治疗。
Cogn Behav Pract. 2015 Feb;22(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.01.010.
5
Evaluating and monitoring treatment response in depression using measurement-based assessment and rating scales.使用基于测量的评估和评定量表评估和监测抑郁症的治疗反应。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;74(7):e14. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12075tx2c.
6
The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes.量表在衡量患者报告结局中的重要性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jul 13;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-80.
7
Standardised rating scales in psychiatry: methodological basis, their possibilities and limitations and descriptions of important rating scales.精神病学中的标准化评定量表:方法学基础、其可能性与局限性以及重要评定量表的描述。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(1):6-26. doi: 10.1080/15622970802264606.
8
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010.
9
Predicting inpatient length of stay with the expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (version 4.0).
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Jan;55(1):77-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.1.77.
10
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.