Iudici Antonio, Girolimetto Riccardo, Volponi Giulia, Eletto Alba
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020 Mar;208(3):181-189. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001092.
Dual diagnosis (DD) commonly identifies a condition of co-occurrence of substance use disorders and psychological or psychiatric disorders. Many scholars have tried to explain this phenomenon, yet no agreement has been found: methodologies of intervention and treatment are numerous, but there is no uniformity of methodology. Our work aims to search critical aspects linked to this fragmented framework, to facilitate those who use the construct of DD. We have elaborated a literary review focused on specific critical contributions to the theoretical and methodological complexity of the construct. Scopus, PubMed, and Scholar were used as search engines. Our research reveals significant problems around several thematic areas: Defining, Operative and Treatment; Economic and Policy; Pharmacological Approach; and Patients' Perspectives Issues. Consistent issues are discussed with regard to DD: innovation should start from its limits. Future research should look for alternative theoretical formulations and consequent intervention experiences to provide new perspectives.
双重诊断(DD)通常指物质使用障碍与心理或精神障碍同时出现的情况。许多学者试图解释这一现象,但尚未达成共识:干预和治疗方法众多,但方法缺乏统一性。我们的工作旨在探寻与这一零散框架相关的关键方面,以帮助那些使用双重诊断概念的人。我们精心开展了一项文献综述,聚焦于对该概念在理论和方法复杂性方面的具体关键贡献。使用Scopus、PubMed和学术搜索引擎进行检索。我们的研究揭示了几个主题领域存在的重大问题:定义、操作与治疗;经济与政策;药理学方法;以及患者视角问题。针对双重诊断讨论了一些一致的问题:创新应从其局限性入手。未来的研究应寻找替代性的理论表述以及相应的干预经验,以提供新的视角。