• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠心病伴医疗风险因素控制不佳的患者的识别与特征:多中心TEACH试验的基线结果及性别差异

Identification and characteristics of distressed patients with coronary heart disease and insufficiently controlled medical risk factors: baseline findings and sex differences from the multicenter TEACH trial.

作者信息

Herrmann-Lingen Christoph, Sadlonova Monika, Becker Ingrid, Bersch Kristina, Geiser Franziska, Hellmich Martin, Kindermann Ingrid, Michal Matthias, Nöhre Mariel, Petersmann Astrid, Wachter Rolf, Belnap Birgit Herbeck, Albus Christian

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Lower Saxony, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 31;16:1494839. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494839. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494839
PMID:39958152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11825747/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medical risk factors and psychological distress are important targets for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). The multicenter randomized controlled TEACH study is the first trial testing a blended collaborative care (BCC) intervention vs. usual care in a cohort of only patients with CHD. The current manuscript analyzes the availability of distressed CHD patients for a BCC intervention trial and the baseline risk profile of the randomized cohort, especially focusing on sex differences.

METHODS

Hospitalized CHD patients with positive HADS and/or PSS-4 screening were rescreened three months later and those still distressed were offered participation in the RCT if they had insufficiently controlled medical risk factors (smoking, physical inactivity, elevated blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and/or HbA1c). The current manuscript describes the TEACH screening process and presents baseline data of the randomized cohort.

RESULTS

Of 2,785 screened patients, 457 patients with persistent distress and insufficiently controlled risk factors were randomized. Older age and lower distress but not sex independently predicted dropout before randomization. In the randomized cohort (mean age 62.9 ± 9.5 years, 77.4% men), women were older than men (p=0.025), more likely to be retired (52.4% vs. 38.6%; p=0.012) and to live without a partner (48.6% vs. 24.8%, p<0.001). Compared to men, they had lower diastolic blood pressure (p=0.003) but higher rates of physical inactivity (56.0% vs. 41.8%; p=0.012) and positive family history of premature atherosclerotic disease (45.7% vs. 29.8%; p=0.009). They also had a lower rate of previous coronary bypass surgery (21.0% vs. 39.2%, p<0.001). A mental disorder had been diagnosed in 54% of all randomized patients and 42% had previously received mental health treatment, both reported substantially more frequently by women than men (both p<0.001). Satisfaction with care before the trial did not differ by sex but was far lower for psychosocial care than for treatment of heart disease (p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

TEACH enrolled a patient sample with persisting distress and a typical risk factor profile. Women differed from men in relevant aspects of their RF profiles and mental health and should receive special attention in future analyses and treatment planning for patients with CHD.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00020824, identifier DRKS00020824.

摘要

引言

医学风险因素和心理困扰是冠心病(CHD)二级预防的重要目标。多中心随机对照TEACH研究是首个在仅患有冠心病的队列中测试混合协作护理(BCC)干预与常规护理对比的试验。本手稿分析了患有心理困扰的冠心病患者参与BCC干预试验的可能性以及随机分组队列的基线风险概况,尤其关注性别差异。

方法

对住院且HADS和/或PSS - 4筛查呈阳性的冠心病患者在三个月后进行重新筛查,那些仍有心理困扰且医学风险因素(吸烟、缺乏运动、血压升高、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和/或糖化血红蛋白)控制不佳的患者被邀请参与随机对照试验(RCT)。本手稿描述了TEACH筛查过程并呈现了随机分组队列的基线数据。

结果

在2785名接受筛查的患者中,457名有持续心理困扰且风险因素控制不佳的患者被随机分组。年龄较大和心理困扰程度较低但并非性别独立预测随机分组前退出试验的情况。在随机分组队列中(平均年龄62.9±9.5岁,77.4%为男性),女性比男性年龄更大(p = 0.025),更有可能退休(52.4%对38.6%;p = 0.012)且独居(48.6%对24.8%,p < 0.001)。与男性相比,她们舒张压较低(p = 0.003),但缺乏运动的比例较高(56.0%对41.8%;p = 0.012)以及有早发性动脉粥样硬化疾病家族史阳性的比例较高(45.7%对29.8%;p = 0.009)。她们既往冠状动脉搭桥手术的比例也较低(21.0%对39.2%,p < 0.001)。在所有随机分组的患者中,54%被诊断患有精神障碍,42%曾接受过心理健康治疗,女性报告的这两项比例均显著高于男性(均p < 0.001)。试验前对护理的满意度在性别上无差异,但心理社会护理的满意度远低于心脏病治疗的满意度(p < 0.001)。

讨论

TEACH纳入了有持续心理困扰和典型风险因素概况的患者样本。女性在风险因素概况和心理健康的相关方面与男性不同,在未来对冠心病患者的分析和治疗规划中应给予特别关注。

临床试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心,https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00020824,标识符DRKS00020824

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a4/11825747/ce49215aeb9e/fpsyt-16-1494839-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a4/11825747/4e223a60936c/fpsyt-16-1494839-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a4/11825747/ce49215aeb9e/fpsyt-16-1494839-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a4/11825747/4e223a60936c/fpsyt-16-1494839-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a4/11825747/ce49215aeb9e/fpsyt-16-1494839-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification and characteristics of distressed patients with coronary heart disease and insufficiently controlled medical risk factors: baseline findings and sex differences from the multicenter TEACH trial.冠心病伴医疗风险因素控制不佳的患者的识别与特征:多中心TEACH试验的基线结果及性别差异
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 31;16:1494839. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494839. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy of team-based collaborative care for distressed patients in secondary prevention of chronic coronary heart disease (TEACH): study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.基于团队的协作式护理对慢性冠心病二级预防中困扰患者的疗效(TEACH):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01810-9.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
7
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3.
8
Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin vs usual care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT).中度高胆固醇血症高血压患者随机接受普伐他汀与常规治疗的主要结局:预防心脏病发作的抗高血压和降脂治疗试验(ALLHAT-LLT)
JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):2998-3007. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.23.2998.
9
A Phase 3 Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenously Administered Ravulizumab Compared with Best Supportive Care in Patients with COVID-19 Severe Pneumonia, Acute Lung Injury, or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估静脉注射瑞维鲁单抗对比 COVID-19 重症肺炎、急性肺损伤或急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者最佳支持治疗的疗效和安全性的 III 期开放性标签、随机对照研究:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构性总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 13;21(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04548-z.
10
Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease.冠心病的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 28;4(4):CD002902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002902.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Team-Based Collaborative Care for Distressed Patients in Secondary Prevention of Chronic Coronary Heart Disease: Results from the Multicenter, Randomized Controlled TEACH Trial.基于团队的协作护理对慢性冠心病二级预防中 distressed 患者的疗效:多中心随机对照 TEACH 试验的结果 。 注:这里“distressed”不太明确具体准确对应中文术语,可结合更详细内容进一步精准翻译,比如“病情危急的”“情绪焦虑的”等,这里先按字面翻译为“distressed” 。
Psychother Psychosom. 2025 May 23:1-19. doi: 10.1159/000545865.

本文引用的文献

1
Routine Stress Testing After PCI in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis of the POST-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial.稳定性冠心病患者与急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后常规负荷试验:POST-PCI 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;9(9):770-780. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1556.
2
The role of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后运动心脏康复在冠心病患者中的作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Acta Cardiol. 2024 Apr;79(2):127-135. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2023.2266650. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Outcomes by sex in the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial.
国际比较卫生效益医学与介入治疗研究(ISCHEMIA)试验中的性别结局。
EuroIntervention. 2024 May 10;20(9):551-560. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00011.
4
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina.一项针对稳定型心绞痛的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安慰剂对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Dec 21;389(25):2319-2330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2310610. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
5
How family history of premature myocardial infarction affects patients at cardiovascular risk.家族性早发心肌梗死史如何影响心血管风险患者。
Health Psychol. 2021 Nov;40(11):754-763. doi: 10.1037/hea0001128.
6
Efficacy of Blended Collaborative Care for Patients With Heart Failure and Comorbid Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. blended 协作式护理对心力衰竭合并抑郁共病患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1369-1380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4978.
7
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.2021年欧洲心脏病学会临床实践中心血管疾病预防指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 7;42(34):3227-3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.
8
Efficacy of team-based collaborative care for distressed patients in secondary prevention of chronic coronary heart disease (TEACH): study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.基于团队的协作式护理对慢性冠心病二级预防中困扰患者的疗效(TEACH):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01810-9.
9
Blended collaborative care in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease improves risk factor control: Results of a randomised feasibility study.混合式协作式护理在冠心病二级预防中改善危险因素控制:一项随机可行性研究的结果。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Feb;19(2):134-141. doi: 10.1177/1474515119880062. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
10
Variation in cardiovascular disease care: an Australian cohort study on sex differences in receipt of coronary procedures.心血管疾病治疗的差异:一项基于澳大利亚队列研究的关于接受冠状动脉介入治疗的性别差异。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e026507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026507.