Yu Hao, Li Zhien, Köhler S Eleonore, van Merriënboer Jeroen J G, Asoodar Maryam
School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06845-0.
Feedback is crucial in medical education for developing communication skills and fostering comprehensive learning. Despite its importance, medical students often face challenges in effectively leveraging feedback. This study investigates how students perceive and make sense of internal and external feedback in a 2nd language (L2) medical Dutch course.
Sixteen third-year international medical students (mean age = 23) participated in a medical Dutch course that included six structured sessions. Each session encompassed a briefing, simulated patient consultations (SPCs), and a debriefing. The curriculum integrated internal feedback from self-reflections and external feedback from peers, teachers, and simulated patients. Data were gathered through a students' feedback perception survey and semi-structured interviews and analyzed via inductive thematic analysis.
Survey data indicated a trend where the preference, satisfaction, and trust in external feedback were higher than those for internal feedback. However, both types of feedback were regarded as equally effective in facilitating learning progress. Through thematic analysis, we identified five crucial themes that show how students perceive and make sense of various forms of feedback: proactive engagement with feedback, critically analyzing and utilizing the exchange in dialogues and discussions, self-reflection and progress tracking, value from diverse perspectives, and moment-specific and actionable feedback.
This study emphasizes the vital roles of internal and external feedback in enhancing medical Dutch communication skills among medical students. Internal feedback encourages self-reflection and growth, essential for complex medical communications, while external feedback provides clear, specific and supportive guidance and experience from teachers, simulated patients and peers. These feedback mechanisms together improve students' skills in medical Dutch communication, leading to better doctor-patient interactions. Future research should focus on adapting these feedback strategies across diverse educational settings to further support the development of medical L2 communication skills in global medical contexts.
反馈对于医学教育中沟通技能的培养和促进全面学习至关重要。尽管其很重要,但医学生在有效利用反馈方面常常面临挑战。本研究调查了学生在第二语言(L2)医学荷兰语课程中如何感知和理解内部及外部反馈。
16名三年级国际医学生(平均年龄 = 23岁)参加了一门医学荷兰语课程,该课程包括六次结构化课程。每次课程包括一个简报、模拟患者咨询(SPCs)和一次总结汇报。课程整合了来自自我反思的内部反馈以及来自同伴、教师和模拟患者的外部反馈。通过学生反馈感知调查和半结构化访谈收集数据,并通过归纳主题分析进行分析。
调查数据表明,一种趋势是学生对外部反馈的偏好、满意度和信任高于内部反馈。然而,两种类型的反馈在促进学习进步方面都被认为同样有效。通过主题分析,我们确定了五个关键主题,展示了学生如何感知和理解各种形式的反馈:积极参与反馈、批判性分析和利用对话及讨论中的交流、自我反思和进展跟踪、从不同角度获取价值,以及特定时刻且可操作的反馈。
本研究强调了内部和外部反馈在提高医学生医学荷兰语沟通技能方面的重要作用。内部反馈鼓励自我反思和成长,这对于复杂的医学沟通至关重要,而外部反馈则提供了来自教师、模拟患者和同伴的清晰、具体且支持性的指导和经验。这些反馈机制共同提高了学生的医学荷兰语沟通技能,从而带来更好的医患互动。未来的研究应专注于在不同教育环境中调整这些反馈策略,以进一步支持全球医学背景下医学第二语言沟通技能的发展。