Suppr超能文献

为提高学生社会工作者的沟通能力而进行的沟通技巧培训。

Communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of student social workers.

作者信息

Reith-Hall Emma, Montgomery Paul

机构信息

Health and Life Sciences De Montfort University Leicester UK.

Department of Social Policy and Social Work University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 23;19(1):e1309. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1309. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Good communication is central to effective social work practice, helping to develop constructive working relationships and improve the outcomes of people in receipt of social work services. There is strong consensus that the teaching and learning of communication skills for social work students is an essential component of social work qualifying courses. However, the variation in communication skills training and its components is significant. There is a sizeable body of evidence relating to communication skills training therefore a review of the findings helps to clarify what we know about this important topic in social work education. We conducted this systematic review to determine whether communication skills training for social work students works and which types of communication skills training, if any, were more effective and lead to the most positive outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate all studies which have investigated the effectiveness of communication skills training programmes for social work students. The research question which the review posed is: 'What is the effectiveness of communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of social work students?' It was intended that the review would provide a robust evaluation of communication skills training for social work students and help explain variations in practice to support educators and policy-makers to make evidence-based decisions in social work education, practice and policy.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a search for published and unpublished studies using a comprehensive search strategy that included multiple electronic databases, research registers, grey literature sources, and reference lists of prior reviews and relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Study selection was based on the following characteristics: Participants were social work students on generic (as opposed to client specific) qualifying courses; Interventions included any form of communication skills training; eligible studies were required to have an appropriate comparator such as no intervention or an alternative intervention; and outcomes included changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and behaviours. Study selection was not restricted by geography, language, publication date or publication type.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The search strategy was developed using the terms featuring in existing knowledge and practice reviews and in consultation with social work researchers, academics and the review advisory panel, to ensure that a broad range of terminology was included. One reviewer conducted the database searches, removing duplicates and irrelevant records, after which each record was screened by title and abstract by both reviewers to ensure robustness. Any studies deemed to be potentially eligible were retrieved in full text and screened by both reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, findings indicate that communication skills training including empathy can be learnt, and that the systematic training of social work students results in some identifiable improvements in their communication skills. However, the evidence is dated, methodological rigour is weak, risk of bias is moderate to high/serious or incomplete, and extreme heterogeneity exists between the primary studies and the interventions they evaluated. As a result, data from the included studies were incomplete, inconsistent, and lacked validity, limiting the findings of this review, whilst identifying that further research is required.

AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS: This review aimed to examine effects of communication skills training on a range of outcomes in social work education. With the exception of skill acquisition, there was insufficient evidence available to offer firm conclusions on other outcomes. For social work educators, our understanding of how communication skills and empathy are taught and learnt remain limited, due to a lack of empirical research and comprehensive discussion. Despite the limitations and variations in educational culture, the findings are still useful, and suggest that communication skills training is likely to be beneficial. One important implication for practice appears to be that the teaching and learning of communication skills in social work education should provide opportunities for students to practice skills in a simulated (or real) environment. For researchers, it is clear that further rigorous research is required. This should include using validated research measures, using research designs which include appropriate counterfactuals, alongside more careful and consistent reporting. The development of the theoretical underpinnings of the interventions used for the teaching and learning of communication skills in social work education is another area that researchers should address.

摘要

背景

良好的沟通是有效社会工作实践的核心,有助于建立建设性的工作关系,并改善接受社会工作服务者的成果。人们强烈认为,对社会工作专业学生进行沟通技能的教学是社会工作资格课程的重要组成部分。然而,沟通技能培训及其组成部分的差异很大。有大量关于沟通技能培训的证据,因此对这些研究结果进行综述有助于澄清我们对社会工作教育这一重要主题的了解。我们进行了这项系统综述,以确定针对社会工作专业学生的沟通技能培训是否有效,以及哪些类型的沟通技能培训(如果有的话)更有效并能带来最积极的结果。

目的

本系统综述旨在严格评估所有调查社会工作专业学生沟通技能培训效果的研究。该综述提出的研究问题是:“沟通技能培训对提高社会工作专业学生的沟通能力有何效果?”旨在通过该综述对社会工作专业学生的沟通技能培训进行有力评估,并帮助解释实践中的差异,以支持教育工作者和政策制定者在社会工作教育、实践和政策方面做出基于证据的决策。

检索方法

我们使用全面的检索策略,对已发表和未发表的研究进行检索,该策略包括多个电子数据库、研究登记册、灰色文献来源以及先前综述和相关研究的参考文献列表。

选择标准

研究选择基于以下特征:参与者为普通(而非针对特定服务对象)资格课程的社会工作专业学生;干预措施包括任何形式的沟通技能培训;符合条件的研究需要有适当的对照,如无干预或替代干预;结果包括知识、态度、技能和行为的变化。研究选择不受地理区域、语言、出版日期或出版类型的限制。

数据收集与分析

检索策略是根据现有知识和实践综述中的术语,并与社会工作研究人员、学者及综述咨询小组协商制定的,以确保纳入广泛的术语。一名评审员进行数据库检索,去除重复和无关记录,之后两名评审员对每条记录进行标题和摘要筛选,以确保严谨性。任何被认为可能符合条件的研究都全文检索并由两名评审员进行筛选。

主要结果

15项研究符合纳入标准。总体而言,研究结果表明包括同理心在内的沟通技能是可以习得的,对社会工作专业学生进行系统培训能使其沟通技能有一些可识别的提高。然而,证据较为陈旧,方法严谨性较弱,偏倚风险为中度至高/严重或不完整,且主要研究及其评估的干预措施之间存在极大异质性。因此,纳入研究的数据不完整、不一致且缺乏有效性,限制了本综述的结果,同时表明需要进一步研究。

作者结论

本综述旨在研究沟通技能培训对社会工作教育一系列结果的影响。除了技能习得外,没有足够的证据就其他结果给出确凿结论。对于社会工作教育工作者而言,由于缺乏实证研究和全面讨论,我们对沟通技能和同理心的教学方式的理解仍然有限。尽管教育文化存在局限性和差异,但研究结果仍然有用,并表明沟通技能培训可能有益。对实践的一个重要启示似乎是,社会工作教育中的沟通技能教学应为学生提供在模拟(或真实)环境中练习技能的机会。对于研究人员来说,显然需要进一步进行严谨的研究。这应包括使用经过验证的研究方法,采用包含适当对照的研究设计,以及更仔细和一致的报告。社会工作教育中用于沟通技能教学的干预措施的理论基础的发展是研究人员应关注的另一个领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcea/9949884/9bee72b667b9/CL2-19-e1309-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验