Berkeveld E, Rhebergen M D F, Bloemers F W, Zandbergen H R, van Merode G G
Amsterdam University Medical Center Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Trauma Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Network for Acute Care Noord-Holland Flevoland, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12311-w.
To manage COVID-19 surge demand, Dutch regional and national task forces were installed to coordinate a proportionate patient distribution. This study examined the effect of centralized COVID-19 patient coordination on hospital capacity utilization during the pandemic.
A retrospective observational double cohort study compared intra- and interregional patient coordination by the regional task force ROAZ Noord-Holland Flevoland. Coordination was compared to a simulated scenario without coordination based on a queueing model during two time periods from January 1, 2021, until May 1, 2021 and from August 1, 2021, until December 1, 2021. Daily data on patient ICU and clinical COVID-19 patient transfers, number of admissions, and capacity were assessed. The primary outcome was hospital capacity utilization.
Overall, 1,213 patients were transferred both within the eleven regional hospitals and outside the region during cohort I and 528 patients during cohort II. During the first cohort, eight hospitals (ICU patients) and two hospitals (clinical patients) showed a utilization factor exceeding 100% without coordination which reduced to below 100% with coordination. During the second cohort, utilization factors exceeding 100% varied between the scenarios with and without coordination. In both cohorts, the majority of hospitals that showed a utilization factor below 100% in the scenario without coordination, showed an increased utilization factor in the scenario with coordination.
This retrospective double cohort analysis based on regional coordination of COVID-19 patients and a simulated scenario of absent regional coordination, identified that load-balancing of COVID-19 care demand generally resulted in an improved distribution of utilization among hospitals. In a crisis, we suggest a swift upscale from local, regional to national centralized coordination activity to enable inter and intra-regional patient coordination at an early stage. Future research is recommended to explore the applicability of coordination for other patient categories to benefit from regional centralization during a crises.
为应对新冠疫情激增的需求,荷兰设立了地区和国家特别工作组来协调合理的患者分配。本研究考察了新冠患者集中协调在疫情期间对医院容量利用的影响。
一项回顾性观察双队列研究比较了北荷兰弗莱福兰地区特别工作组(ROAZ)在区域内和区域间的患者协调情况。在2021年1月1日至2021年5月1日以及2021年8月1日至2021年12月1日这两个时间段内,将协调情况与基于排队模型的无协调模拟场景进行比较。评估了患者重症监护病房(ICU)和临床新冠患者转运的每日数据、入院人数和容量。主要结局是医院容量利用情况。
总体而言,在队列I期间,11家区域医院内部及区域外共转运了1213名患者,队列II期间转运了528名患者。在第一个队列中,8家医院(ICU患者)和2家医院(临床患者)在无协调情况下利用率超过100%,协调后降至100%以下。在第二个队列中,有协调和无协调场景下利用率超过100%的情况有所不同。在两个队列中,大多数在无协调场景下利用率低于100%的医院,在有协调场景下利用率有所提高。
这项基于新冠患者区域协调和无区域协调模拟场景的回顾性双队列分析表明,新冠护理需求的负荷平衡通常会改善医院间的利用分布。在危机情况下,我们建议迅速从地方、区域协调提升至国家集中协调活动,以便在早期实现区域间和区域内的患者协调。建议未来研究探索协调对其他患者类别的适用性,以便在危机期间从区域集中化中受益。