Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎的前瞻性对比研究

A Prospective and Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Open Appendectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Appendicitis.

作者信息

Srivastava Shriya, Yadav Gulab Dhar, Shukla Priyesh, Verma Shraddha

机构信息

General Surgery, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jan 18;17(1):e77631. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77631. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction Appendicitis is a prevalent surgical etiology of abdominal pain encountered in medical emergencies globally. Consequently, appendectomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure. Despite advancements in surgical techniques, there is a lack of prospective studies evaluating these approaches across the full spectrum of appendicitis severity. Due to the absence of consensus on the optimal approach, both open and laparoscopic appendectomy are frequently being practiced. Our study aims to address this gap by providing a comprehensive comparison of laparoscopic and open appendectomy performed in all diagnosed uncomplicated and complicated cases of appendicitis, which includes acute appendicitis, sub-acute appendicitis, chronic appendicitis, appendicular perforation, appendicular abscess. Materials and methods This was a prospective study, performed at the Department of General Surgery, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial (GSVM) Medical College, Kanpur, between September 2023 and August 2024. The 60 patients were divided, using the odd-even method, between the laparoscopic appendectomy group (LA) and the open appendectomy group (OA), with 30 patients in each group. The study included patients with uncomplicated as well as complicated appendicitis and was conducted after attaining informed consent and ethical approval for the study. Results The laparoscopic approach offered a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay (3.57±2.5 days in LA and 7.53±2.7 days in OA), better postoperative pain recovery (mean VAS score being 2.17±1.13 in LA and 4.30±0.64 in OA) and reduced need for either oral or intravenous analgesics, 24 hours postoperatively, earlier return of normal bowel activity (8.2±4.2 hours in LA and 15.6±5.9 hours in OA), oral intake tolerance (96.7% patients in LA and 76.7% patients in OA were able to tolerate oral liquids on the first postoperative day), earlier return to routine activities (4.17±3.8 days and 7.17±2.7 days in LA and OA, respectively) and higher patient satisfaction (90% patients after LA and 60% patients after OA were "extremely satisfied"). The only shortcoming was the increased duration of surgery (53.17±12.4 and 23.7±6.2 min in the LA and OA groups, respectively). While few complications were more commonly associated with either procedure, like intra-abdominal abscess (6.7%) with LA and wound infection (10%) with OA, no statistically significant difference was observed in overall postoperative complication rates among the two groups. The quality of recovery after either procedure did not have a significant difference on long-term follow-up after surgery. Conclusion Our study revealed that the laparoscopic appendectomy group offered several significant advantages in postoperative recovery over the open appendectomy group, both in uncomplicated as well as complicated cases of appendicitis. Thus, laparoscopic appendicectomy should be considered as the surgery of choice, in uncomplicated as well as complicated cases of appendicitis, given that surgical skills are available.

摘要

引言

阑尾炎是全球医疗紧急情况下常见的腹痛手术病因。因此,阑尾切除术是最常进行的外科手术。尽管手术技术有所进步,但缺乏对各种严重程度阑尾炎的这些手术方法进行评估的前瞻性研究。由于在最佳手术方法上缺乏共识,开放和腹腔镜阑尾切除术都经常被采用。我们的研究旨在通过对所有诊断为单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎(包括急性阑尾炎、亚急性阑尾炎、慢性阑尾炎、阑尾穿孔、阑尾脓肿)的病例进行腹腔镜和开放阑尾切除术的全面比较来填补这一空白。

材料与方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,于2023年9月至2024年8月在坎普尔的甘尼什·尚卡尔·维迪亚蒂纪念(GSVM)医学院普通外科进行。60例患者采用奇偶法分为腹腔镜阑尾切除术组(LA)和开放阑尾切除术组(OA),每组30例。该研究包括单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎患者,研究在获得知情同意和伦理批准后进行。

结果

腹腔镜手术方式住院时间明显更短(LA组为3.57±2.5天,OA组为7.53±2.7天),术后疼痛恢复更好(LA组平均视觉模拟评分[VAS]为2.17±1.13,OA组为4.30±0.64),术后24小时口服或静脉镇痛药物需求减少,正常肠道活动恢复更早(LA组为8.2±4.2小时,OA组为15.6±5.9小时),口服耐受性更好(LA组96.7%的患者术后第一天能耐受口服液体,OA组为76.7%),恢复日常活动更早(LA组为4.17±3.8天,OA组为7.17±2.7天),患者满意度更高(LA组90%的患者和OA组60%的患者“非常满意”)。唯一的缺点是手术时间延长(LA组为53.17±12.4分钟,OA组为23.7±6.2分钟)。虽然少数并发症在某种手术中更常见,如LA组的腹腔内脓肿(6.7%)和OA组的伤口感染(10%),但两组术后总体并发症发生率无统计学显著差异。两种手术方式术后恢复质量在术后长期随访中无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,无论在单纯性还是复杂性阑尾炎病例中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术组在术后恢复方面比开放阑尾切除术组具有几个显著优势。因此,在具备手术技能的情况下,对于单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎病例,腹腔镜阑尾切除术都应被视为首选手术方式。

相似文献

3
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
8
Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜检查在复杂性阑尾炎中的疗效
Int J Surg. 2009 Jun;7(3):250-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
9

本文引用的文献

3
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验