Okomo Uduak, Aquaisua Ememobong N, Asemota Osamagbe, Ndukwu Deborah, Egbung Josephine E, Esu Ekpereonne B, Oduwole Olabisi A, Ehiri John E
Faculty of Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
J Public Health Afr. 2025 Jan 17;16(2):601. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i2.601. eCollection 2025.
There is a substantial risk of indirect transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from contaminated surfaces and objects in healthcare settings.
To evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced cleaning protocols for high-touch surfaces during COVID-19, focusing on cleaning products, concentrations, contact time, and recommended frequency.
We focused on research conducted in healthcare settings or where samples were obtained from healthcare environments.
We assessed studies that compared different cleaning, disinfection, sterilisation, or decontamination procedures and cleaning frequency with standard or routine procedures. We prioritised randomised trials, non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series analyses carried out between 01 January 2020 and 31 August 2022.
Three studies met our criteria from 2139 references searched. These studies, which took place in Iran, China and the United States, found that routine terminal cleaning and enhanced terminal cleaning with different cleaning enhancements significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 surface contamination. One of the studies tested residual SARS-CoV-2 levels after routine and terminal cleaning with varying strengths of disinfectant and evaluated the efficacy of two common types of disinfectants in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 on inanimate surfaces in different hospital wards.
Limited evidence supports cleaning strategies that can reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from surfaces in healthcare settings. Combining various cleaning methods and using multiple disinfectants can effectively reduce surface contamination.
Randomised controlled trials are crucial for evaluating cleaning effectiveness. They must outline cleaning protocols, detailing frequency, product concentration and volume, application methods, soil and surface types, and environmental conditions, to provide strong evidence.
在医疗机构中,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)通过受污染的表面和物体发生间接传播的风险很大。
评估在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)期间针对高接触表面强化清洁方案的有效性,重点关注清洁产品、浓度、接触时间和推荐频率。
我们重点关注在医疗机构中或从医疗环境中获取样本的研究。
我们评估了比较不同清洁、消毒、灭菌或去污程序以及清洁频率与标准或常规程序的研究。我们优先考虑2020年1月1日至2022年8月31日期间进行的随机试验、非随机对照试验、前后对照研究和中断时间序列分析。
在检索的2139篇参考文献中,有三项研究符合我们的标准。这些分别在伊朗、中国和美国进行的研究发现,常规终末清洁以及采用不同强化措施的强化终末清洁显著降低了SARS-CoV-2的表面污染。其中一项研究测试了使用不同强度消毒剂进行常规和终末清洁后的SARS-CoV-2残留水平,并评估了两种常见消毒剂在不同医院病房无生命表面灭活SARS-CoV-2的效果。
有限的证据支持可减少医疗机构中SARS-CoV-2通过表面传播的清洁策略。结合多种清洁方法并使用多种消毒剂可有效减少表面污染。
随机对照试验对于评估清洁效果至关重要。它们必须概述清洁方案,详细说明频率、产品浓度和用量、应用方法、污垢和表面类型以及环境条件,以提供有力证据。