Suppr超能文献

新型冠状病毒2019(SARS-CoV-2)的消毒和去污方法:研究的系统评价

Methods to disinfect and decontaminate SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of studies.

作者信息

Kwok Chun Shing, Dashti Mustafa, Tafuro Jacopo, Nasiri Mojtaba, Muntean Elena-Andra, Wong Nicholas, Kemp Timothy, Hills George, Mallen Christian D

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.

出版信息

Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 16;8:2049936121998548. doi: 10.1177/2049936121998548. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cleaning is a major control component for outbreaks of infection. However, for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there is limited specific guidance regarding the proper disinfection methods that should be used.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature on cleaning, disinfection or decontamination methods in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies were included, reporting a variety of methods with which the effectiveness of interventions were assessed. Virus was inoculated onto different types of material including masks, nasopharyngeal swabs, serum, laboratory plates and simulated saliva, tears or nasal fluid and then interventions were applied in an attempt to eliminate the virus including chemical, ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation, and heat and humidity. At body temperature (37°C) there is evidence that the virus will not be detectable after 2 days but this can be reduced to non-detection at 30 min at 56°C, 15 min at 65°C and 2 min at 98°C. Different experimental methods testing UV light have shown that it can inactivate the virus. Light of 254-365 nm has been used, including simulated sunlight. Many chemical agents including bleach, hand sanitiser, hand wash, soap, ethanol, isopropanol, guandinium thiocynate/t-octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol, formaldehyde, povidone-iodine, 0.05% chlorhexidine, 0.1% benzalkonium chloride, acidic electrolysed water, Clyraguard copper iodine complex and hydrogen peroxide vapour have been shown to disinfect SARS-CoV-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Heating, UV light irradiation and chemicals can be used to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 but there is insufficient evidence to support one measure over others in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

清洁是感染暴发的主要控制环节。然而,对于新冠疫情,关于应使用的适当消毒方法的具体指导有限。

方法

我们对预防新冠病毒的清洁、消毒或去污方法的文献进行了系统综述。

结果

共纳入27项研究,报告了多种评估干预措施有效性的方法。将病毒接种到不同类型的材料上,包括口罩、鼻咽拭子、血清、实验室培养皿以及模拟唾液、眼泪或鼻液,然后应用干预措施试图消除病毒,包括化学方法、紫外线(UV)照射以及加热和加湿。在体温(37°C)下,有证据表明2天后病毒将无法检测到,但在56°C下30分钟、65°C下15分钟和98°C下2分钟可将其降至无法检测到的水平。不同测试紫外线的实验方法表明它可以使病毒失活。已使用254 - 365纳米的光,包括模拟阳光。许多化学试剂,包括漂白剂、洗手液、洗手皂、肥皂、乙醇、异丙醇、硫氰酸胍/辛基酚聚氧乙烯醚、甲醛、聚维酮碘、0.05%氯己定、0.1%苯扎氯铵、酸性电解水、Clyraguard铜碘复合物和过氧化氢蒸汽,已被证明可对新冠病毒进行消毒。

结论

加热、紫外线照射和化学方法可用于使新冠病毒失活,但在临床实践中,没有足够的证据支持一种措施优于其他措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f57/7970236/c73a15d7daf4/10.1177_2049936121998548-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验