Potential Efficacy of Inflammatory Response Markers for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer in Patients with Endometrioma.

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the effectiveness of preoperative inflammatory response markers in distinguishing clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) from ovarian endometrioma.

METHODS

Patients with stage I ovarian cancer with histology CCC/EC or endometrioma who underwent surgery at our institution between 2010 and 2021 were included. Preoperative inflammatory response markers evaluated were white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, D-dimer, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The tumor markers CA125 and CA19-9 were analyzed. The median values of these markers were compared between the CCC/EC and the endometrioma groups. The areas under the curve (AUC) in Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with stage I CCC/EC and 247 patients with endometrioma were included in the study. Inflammatory response markers were significantly higher in CCC/EC cases than in endometrioma cases ( < 0.01). Tumor markers demonstrated higher specificity than inflammatory response markers. The AUCs of CRP, ESR, D-dimer, NLR, and SII were significantly higher than those of CA125 and CA19-9 ( < 0.01). The values of NLR, PLR, and SII in four cases of ovarian cancer with preoperative suspected endometrioma were higher than the cut-off value.

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory response markers may be useful for the detection of stage I ovarian cancer. Notably, the NLR or SII, calculated using a complete blood count, appears particularly efficient. Combining tumor and inflammatory response markers may enhance diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing ovarian cancer from endometrioma.