Massironi Sara, Gallo Camilla, Coltro Lorenzo, Dell'Anna Giuseppe, Preatoni Paoletta, Danese Silvio
Vita e Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Gastroenterology Unit, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi, Zingonia (BG), Italy.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s40618-025-02552-1.
Digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) encompass a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying prognoses and clinical behaviors. Grade 2 (G2) tumors, defined by a Ki-67 index between 3% and 20%, are particularly challenging to manage due to their intermediate and variable biological behavior. Evidence suggests a distinct prognosis between G2 digestive NENs with a Ki-67 index < 10% and those with a Ki-67 index ≥ 10%.
To investigate the clinical and biological heterogeneity between Grade 1 (G1) and G2 digestive NENs, and within G2 tumors, with a focus on the prognostic significance of a 10% Ki-67 index cutoff.
This study involved a combined retrospective and prospective analysis of patients with low-grade G1 and G2 digestive NENs managed at IRCCS San Gerardo Hospital in Monza, Italy, between January 2000 and May 2024. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were collected and potential differences were analyzed between G1, G2 with Ki-67 index < 10% and G2 with Ki-67 index ≥ 10%.
Out of a total of 113 enrolled patients, 69 (61%) had G1 tumors, and 44 (39%) had G2 tumors. Median tumor size at diagnosis was 19 mm (IQR: 12-25 mm), with primary lesions mainly localized in the pancreas (57% among G1 and 45% among G2). Most G1 tumors were diagnosed at stage I (29 patients, 42%), while the majority of G2 tumors were metastatic at diagnosis (24 patients, 54.5%). Patients with G1 tumors exhibited a slightly higher 5-year OS rate compared to G2 tumors (98.1% vs. 92.8% respectively, though not statistically significant), and a significantly longer median PFS (141 vs. 22 months, p = 0.0003). Within the G2 group, 31 patients (70%) had a Ki-67 index < 10%, while 13 (30%) had a Ki-67 index ≥ 10%, with comparable baseline characteristics. A Ki-67 index < 10% was associated with a significantly better median PFS (38 vs. 8 months for tumors with Ki-67 index ≥ 10% G2 tumors, p = 0.002). PFS after first-line medical therapy was significantly longer in patients with a Ki-67 index < 10%, compared to those with ≥ 10% (undefined vs. 16 months, p = 0.0085), as well as median post-surgical PFS (84 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified higher tumor grade, advanced stage at diagnosis, and absence of PRRT as independent predictors of worse outcomes.
The findings highlight the significant clinical heterogeneity within G2 digestive NENs. A Ki-67 index cutoff of 10% within G2 tumors may serve as a critical prognostic marker, with patients with a Ki-67 index < 10% exhibiting significantly better outcomes in terms of PFS. These results suggest that the Ki-67 index could play an essential role in guiding treatment strategies, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches in managing G2 digestive NENs.
消化系神经内分泌肿瘤(NENs)是一组异质性肿瘤,预后和临床行为各异。Ki-67指数在3%至20%之间的2级(G2)肿瘤,因其生物学行为介于中间且多变,在治疗上尤其具有挑战性。有证据表明,Ki-67指数<10%的G2消化系NENs与Ki-67指数≥10%的G2消化系NENs之间预后不同。
研究1级(G1)和G2消化系NENs之间以及G2肿瘤内部的临床和生物学异质性,重点关注Ki-67指数临界值为10%的预后意义。
本研究对2000年1月至2024年5月期间在意大利蒙扎IRCCS圣杰拉尔多医院接受治疗的低级别G1和G2消化系NENs患者进行了回顾性和前瞻性联合分析。收集了患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征、治疗方式和生存结果的数据,并分析了G1、Ki-67指数<10%的G2和Ki-67指数≥10%的G2之间的潜在差异。
在总共113名入组患者中,69名(61%)患有G1肿瘤,44名(39%)患有G2肿瘤。诊断时肿瘤中位大小为19毫米(IQR:12 - 25毫米),主要病变部位在胰腺(G1中占57%,G2中占45%)。大多数G1肿瘤在I期诊断(29例患者,42%),而大多数G2肿瘤在诊断时已发生转移(24例患者,54.5%)。G1肿瘤患者的5年总生存率略高于G2肿瘤患者(分别为98.1%和92.8%,虽无统计学意义),且中位无进展生存期显著更长(141个月对22个月,p = 0.0003)。在G2组中,31名患者(70%)的Ki-67指数<10%,而13名(30%)的Ki-67指数≥10%,基线特征具有可比性。Ki-67指数<10%与显著更好的中位无进展生存期相关(Ki-67指数≥10%的G2肿瘤为38个月对8个月,p = 0.002)。一线药物治疗后的无进展生存期,Ki-67指数<10%的患者显著长于Ki-67指数≥10%的患者(未定义对16个月,p = 0.0085),以及术后中位无进展生存期(84个月对10.5个月,p < 0.0001)。多因素分析确定肿瘤分级较高、诊断时分期较晚以及未接受肽受体放射性核素治疗(PRRT)是预后较差的独立预测因素。
研究结果突出了G2消化系NENs内显著的临床异质性。G2肿瘤中Ki-67指数临界值为10%可能是一个关键的预后标志物,Ki-67指数<10%的患者在无进展生存期方面表现出显著更好的结果。这些结果表明,Ki-67指数在指导治疗策略方面可能发挥重要作用,强调在管理G2消化系NENs时需要个性化方法。