Creutzburg Andreas, Nørskov Anders Kehlet, Christensen Michelle Icka, Afshari Arash, Lundstrøm Lars Hyldborg, Bill Louise, Nedergaard Helene Korvenius, Vested Matias
Department of Anaesthesiology, Operation and Trauma Center, Center of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Mar;69(3):e70008. doi: 10.1111/aas.70008.
Both the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the Difficult Airway Society recommend the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) to facilitate tracheal intubation and to reduce the risk of complications. Even though it is recommended to use video laryngoscopy for intubation, especially in circumstances where difficult tracheal intubation is expected, the evidence for the combination of video laryngoscopy and NMBAs is sparse. This protocol outlines a systematic review of the effect of avoidance versus use of NMBAs for tracheal intubation during video laryngoscopy in adults.
This protocol is made in accordance with reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols recommendations. We intent to include randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of avoidance versus use of NMBAs during video laryngoscopy to facilitate tracheal intubation (either nasal or oral) in the adult population. The primary outcome is failed first-pass intubation. Our secondary outcomes include adverse and serious adverse events. A thorough search will be done to identify relevant trials, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Web of Science and CIHNAL. Furthermore, trial registries will be searched for unpublished trials. Each trial will be evaluated for bias. We will use appropriate packages in R to perform the meta-analysis. Additionally, we will perform trial sequential analysis on the meta-analysis of our primary outcome. Lastly, we will employ the GRADE approach and create "Summary of Findings" tables.
欧洲麻醉与重症监护学会以及困难气道协会均推荐使用神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBAs)以促进气管插管并降低并发症风险。尽管推荐使用视频喉镜进行插管,尤其是在预计气管插管困难的情况下,但关于视频喉镜与NMBAs联合使用的证据却很稀少。本方案概述了一项关于在成人视频喉镜检查期间避免使用与使用NMBAs进行气管插管效果的系统评价。
本方案是根据系统评价和荟萃分析方案的报告项目建议制定的。我们打算纳入评估在成人中进行视频喉镜检查时避免使用与使用NMBAs以促进气管插管(鼻插管或口插管)效果的随机对照试验。主要结局是首次插管失败。我们的次要结局包括不良事件和严重不良事件。将进行全面检索以识别相关试验,包括Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、生物学文摘数据库、科学引文索引数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库。此外,还将检索试验注册库以查找未发表的试验。将对每个试验进行偏倚评估。我们将使用R语言中的适当软件包进行荟萃分析。此外,我们将对主要结局的荟萃分析进行试验序贯分析。最后,我们将采用GRADE方法并创建“结果总结”表。