Clark Fay E, Burdass Jasmine, Kavanagh Annalise, King Annabel
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):4512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88217-8.
The ability to innovate implies flexible cognition, and is used as a broad metric of intelligence. Innovation in birds has been intensively studied in the larger and more taxonomically diverse Neognathae clade (particularly crows and parrots) and overlooked in the smaller and more ancestral Palaeognathae clade. The current study provides the first known evidence of technical innovation in palaeognath birds. We tested the ability of nine individuals of three species to move a hole towards a chamber to access a food reward. This problem was different to traditional innovation puzzle-boxes where an obstacle is moved away from a food chamber. Three emus and one rhea produced a wheel-turning innovation, moving the hole in the most efficient direction (closer to the nearest food item) in 90% of cases. One rhea dismantled the task twice by removing the central bolt, which we suggest is a second type of innovation, and it did not persist once they innovated the wheel turning solution. Ostriches did not innovate. We classify innovation in palaeognaths as low level/simplistic, relying on general exploration and asocial trial and error learning. Our research suggests that technical innovation may have evolved far earlier in birds than previously thought, and palaeognath birds are a compelling taxonomic group for further cognitive research.
创新能力意味着灵活的认知,并且被用作智力的一个宽泛衡量标准。鸟类的创新在更大且分类学上更多样化的新颚类分支(特别是乌鸦和鹦鹉)中得到了深入研究,而在较小且更原始的古颚类分支中却被忽视了。当前的研究提供了古颚类鸟类技术创新的首个已知证据。我们测试了三个物种的九只个体将一个洞朝着一个腔室移动以获取食物奖励的能力。这个问题与传统的创新解谜盒不同,在传统解谜盒中,障碍物是从食物腔室移开。三只鸸鹋和一只美洲鸵产生了转动轮子的创新,在90%的情况下将洞朝着最有效的方向(更靠近最近的食物)移动。一只美洲鸵通过移除中心螺栓两次拆解了任务,我们认为这是另一种创新类型,并且一旦它们想出了转动轮子的解决方案,就不再持续这样做。鸵鸟没有创新。我们将古颚类的创新归类为低水平/简单的,依赖于一般的探索和非社会性的试错学习。我们的研究表明,鸟类的技术创新可能比之前认为的在更早的时候就已经进化,并且古颚类鸟类是进行进一步认知研究的一个有吸引力的分类群体。