• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰痛的常规测量;使用医学技术评估机构生产力成本问卷实现实用的患者报告生产力成本结果测量。

Routine measurement in low back pain; towards a pragmatic patient-reported productivity cost outcome measurement using the institute for medical technology assessment productivity cost questionnaire.

作者信息

Ademiluyi Adekunle Z, van Asselt Antoinette D I, Reneman Michiel F

机构信息

University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01756-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-025-01756-9
PMID:39979658
Abstract

PURPOSE

The iMTA productivity cost questionnaire (iPCQ) has been recommended as a measurement tool for productivity cost, however, its use in routine care is hindered by the length of this questionnaire (18 questions). This study developed and tested a short-form (SF-) iPCQ.

METHOD

A secondary analysis of the Groningen Spine Cohort's baseline data from patients with low back pain referred for tertiary care was performed. Six SFs were evaluated against the comprehensive iPCQ. Spearman correlation (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, agreement), standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman's plot tested the congruence of the SFs with the comprehensive iPCQ.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 1220 patients with low back pain. The SF version with the highest correlation (SF-3; 7 items) with the comprehensive iPCQ had r = 0.99, ICC = 0.99, SEM = 295, while the SF with the least number of items (SF-6; 5 items) had r = 0.84, ICC = 0.91, SEM = 2063. The mean productivity cost estimates of SF-3 and SF-6 were €3414 (95% CI: 3036-3791) and €3333 (95% CI: 2970-3696) respectively while that for the comprehensive iPCQ amounted to €3456 (95% CI: 3189-3720).

CONCLUSION

A SF with seven questions was developed with a high agreement with the comprehensive iPCQ. Initial clinimetric testing was satisfactory. Further assessment is recommended.

摘要

目的

iMTA生产力成本问卷(iPCQ)已被推荐作为生产力成本的测量工具,然而,该问卷的长度(18个问题)阻碍了其在常规护理中的使用。本研究开发并测试了简版(SF-)iPCQ。

方法

对格罗宁根脊柱队列中因腰痛转诊至三级护理的患者的基线数据进行二次分析。将六个简版与完整的iPCQ进行评估。采用Spearman相关性(r)、组内相关系数(ICC,一致性)、测量标准误差(SEM)以及Bland-Altman图来测试简版与完整iPCQ的一致性。

结果

样本包括1220例腰痛患者。与完整iPCQ相关性最高的简版(SF-3;7个问题)的r = 0.99,ICC = 0.99,SEM = 295,而问题数量最少的简版(SF-6;5个问题)的r = 0.84,ICC = 0.91,SEM = 2063。SF-3和SF-6的平均生产力成本估计分别为3414欧元(95%CI:3036 - 3791)和3333欧元(95%CI:2970 - 3696),而完整iPCQ的平均生产力成本估计为3456欧元(95%CI:3189 - 3720)。

结论

开发了一个包含七个问题的简版,与完整iPCQ具有高度一致性。初步的临床测量学测试结果令人满意。建议进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Routine measurement in low back pain; towards a pragmatic patient-reported productivity cost outcome measurement using the institute for medical technology assessment productivity cost questionnaire.腰痛的常规测量;使用医学技术评估机构生产力成本问卷实现实用的患者报告生产力成本结果测量。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01756-9.
2
Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire.《iMTA 生产力成本问卷韩文版的文化调适与效度验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 24;8(2):184. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020184.
3
Measuring Productivity Costs in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders: Measurement Properties of the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire.测量肌肉骨骼疾病患者的生产力成本:医疗技术评估生产力成本问卷的测量特性。
Value Health. 2019 Dec;22(12):1410-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Test-Retest Reliability, Agreement and Responsiveness of Productivity Loss (iPCQ-VR) and Healthcare Utilization (TiCP-VR) Questionnaires for Sick Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患病劳动者生产力损失(iPCQ-VR)和医疗保健利用(TiCP-VR)问卷重测信度、一致性和反应度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(1):91-103. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9767-9.
5
Comparison of self-reported and public registered absenteeism among people on long-term sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: criterion validity of the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire.比较因肌肉骨骼疾病长期请病假人群的自我报告和公共登记缺勤情况:iMTA 生产力成本问卷的效标效度。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Aug;22(6):865-872. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01294-0. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: validity and reliability.《巴西版伯恩茅斯腰痛问卷的心理测量特性:有效性和可靠性》。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Reproducibility: Reliability and Agreement Parameters of the Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 for use in Patients with Musculoskeletal Shoulder Pain.可重复性:修订版简短麦吉尔疼痛问卷第2版在肩部肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中使用的可靠性和一致性参数
Can J Pain. 2020 Dec 30;4(4):45-46. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2020.1712653.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire-Short Form for Chronic Low Back Pain.《Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷简表-慢性下背痛日本版的有效性和可靠性》。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jul;25(4):E681-E688.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Amharic version of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚版罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷在埃塞俄比亚腰痛患者中的跨文化调适与验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(19):5638-5648. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1939798. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The Economic and Social Burden of Low Back Pain in Spain: A National Assessment of the Economic and Social Impact of Low Back Pain in Spain.西班牙下背痛的经济和社会负担:西班牙下背痛经济和社会影响的全国评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Aug 15;45(16):E1026-E1032. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003476.
2
Personal and Societal Impact of Low Back Pain: The Groningen Spine Cohort.腰背疼痛的个人和社会影响:格罗宁根脊柱队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):E1443-E1451. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003174.
3
Acceptance versus catastrophizing in predicting quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain.
接受与灾难化思维对慢性下腰痛患者生活质量的预测作用
Korean J Pain. 2019 Jan;32(1):22-29. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.1.22. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
The Impact of Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: Costs and Patients' Burden.慢性椎间盘源性下腰痛的影响:成本与患者负担
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Oct 1;2018:4696180. doi: 10.1155/2018/4696180. eCollection 2018.
5
Methods for shortening patient-reported outcome measures.缩短患者报告结局测量工具的方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):2992-3011. doi: 10.1177/0962280218795187. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
Test-Retest Reliability, Agreement and Responsiveness of Productivity Loss (iPCQ-VR) and Healthcare Utilization (TiCP-VR) Questionnaires for Sick Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患病劳动者生产力损失(iPCQ-VR)和医疗保健利用(TiCP-VR)问卷重测信度、一致性和反应度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(1):91-103. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9767-9.
7
Update of the Dutch manual for costing studies in health care.《荷兰医疗保健成本研究手册》更新版
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187477. eCollection 2017.
8
IMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (IPCQ).IMTA生产力成本调查问卷(IPCQ)。
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A550. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1791. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
9
The iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire: A Standardized Instrument for Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Productivity Losses.iMTA生产力成本问卷:一种用于测量和评估与健康相关的生产力损失的标准化工具。
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
10
A noticeable difference? Productivity costs related to paid and unpaid work in economic evaluations on expensive drugs.一个显著的差异?在昂贵药物的经济评估中与有偿和无偿工作相关的生产力成本。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 May;17(4):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0685-x. Epub 2015 Apr 16.