Thies Sibylle Brunhilde, Bevan Susan, Wassall Matthew, Mootien Cynthia Poolay, Kenney Laurence, Howard David
Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Brian Blatchford Building Room PO28, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
NRS Healthcare, Coalville, Leicestershire, LE67 1UB, UK.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05754-7.
One important aspect of walking aid use is transferring safely to the aid from sitting and transferring back to the chair after walking, since these activities have been associated with falls in older adults. Standard frames require their user to push off the chair or ask for help from a carer, which may over time lead to back pain. This study's aim was to assess whether novel handgrips located above the rear feet of a walking frame would facilitate safe transfer as compared to utilizing only the seat cushion or armrests of the chair.
In a gait lab-based trial 10 healthy older adults repeatedly transferred from sitting to standing, pushing off the chair's seat cushion, armrests, or using the new lower handles on the frame (alone or in combination with the seat cushion or armrest). The stability margin 'SM', defined as the distance between the centre of pressure and the nearest edge of the base of support for the user-device-chair system, was calculated as a mechanical measure of stability. Specifically, SM provides a measure of how close the system is to the point of tipping over. Additionally, 13 older frame users tried to use the new handgrips to transfer to/from the new frame and gave interviews which were thematically analysed.
Stability for the 10 healthy older adults was statistically either equivalent or better when using one or both handles on the novel frame as compared to pushing off the chair's seat cushion or armrests. Amongst the 13 older frame users the frame's new handgrips were useful to those living in the community and one person living in care, and they perceived them to facilitate independence and control.
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS: The novel handgrips offer continuous support when getting up/sitting down and are well-received by those able to use them. The significance of the research lies in the reported number of falls during transfer from sitting to standing and vice versus, with underlying causes reported including loss of support. The proposed design is timely considering the documented increases in frailty and walking aid use in our ageing population.
使用助行器的一个重要方面是在坐下后安全地转移到助行器上,并在行走后再转移回椅子上,因为这些活动与老年人跌倒有关。标准框架要求使用者从椅子上起身或寻求护理人员的帮助,随着时间的推移,这可能会导致背痛。本研究的目的是评估与仅使用椅垫或扶手相比,位于助行器后脚上方的新型把手是否有助于安全转移。
在基于步态实验室的试验中,10名健康的老年人反复从坐姿转移到站姿,分别通过推开椅垫、扶手,或使用助行器上的新的较低把手(单独使用或与椅垫或扶手结合使用)。稳定性余量“SM”被定义为用户-设备-椅子系统的压力中心与支撑底座最近边缘之间的距离,作为稳定性的机械测量指标。具体而言,SM提供了一个衡量系统接近倾覆点程度的指标。此外,13名老年助行器使用者尝试使用新把手在新助行器上进行转移,并接受了主题分析访谈。
与推开椅垫或扶手相比,10名健康的老年人在使用新型助行器上的一个或两个把手时,稳定性在统计学上相当或更好。在13名老年助行器使用者中,助行器的新把手对社区居住者和一名住养老院的人有用,他们认为这些把手有助于实现独立和自主控制。
新型把手在起身/坐下时提供持续支撑,并且受到能够使用它们的人的欢迎。该研究的意义在于报告了从坐姿到站姿以及反之过程中跌倒的数量,报告的潜在原因包括失去支撑。考虑到我们老龄化人口中衰弱和助行器使用增加的记录,所提出的设计很及时。