Thies Sibylle Brunhilde, Russell Rachel, Al-Ani Abdullah, Belet Tom, Bates Alex, Costamagna Eleonora, Kenney Laurence, Howard Dave
Centre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Centre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Gait Posture. 2020 Oct;82:248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Walking aids are designed for structural support during walking, however, surprisingly self-reported use of a walking aid ("Yes, I use one.") has been identified as a risk factor for falling. Adjustment and design of walking aids may affect their usefulness in facilitating a stable walking pattern. We previously identified that increased body weight transfer onto a walking frame ('device loading') is associated with increased user stability.
We asked: "Could adjustment of walking frame height to a lower height than clinically recommended serve as a mechanism to facilitate device loading and thereby increase stability? And: "Do ultra-narrow frames have an adverse effect on stability as compared to standard-width frames?
Ten older adults that were users of front-wheeled walking frames walked with walking frames of 1) 'standard width, standard height', 2)'standard width, low height', 3)'narrow width, standard height'. Smart Walker technology was used to record forces acting on the walking frame and inside the user's shoes, and cameras recorded relative position of the user's feet in relation to the frame's feet. Stability of the user-frame system and device loading (percent body weight transferred onto the frame) were calculated. A general linear mixed effects model was used for statistical analysis.
A lower height setting did not increase device loading and stability, therefore adjusting the height to a lower setting proved to be an unsuccessful mechanism to increase stability. However, device loading was positively correlated with stability for all frame conditions (p < 0.05). Finally, stability was reduced when walking with the ultra-narrow, as compared to standard-width, frame (p = 0.002).
To increase stability in fall-prone users, active encouragement to transfer body weight onto the walking frame is needed. Considering the adverse effects of ultra-narrow frames on stability, such frames should be prescribed and used with caution.
助行器旨在为行走过程提供结构支撑,然而,令人惊讶的是,自我报告使用助行器(“是的,我使用一个。”)已被确定为跌倒的风险因素。助行器的调整和设计可能会影响其在促进稳定行走模式方面的效用。我们之前发现,增加转移到步行框架上的体重(“设备负荷”)与使用者稳定性的增加相关。
我们提出:“将步行框架高度调整到低于临床推荐高度能否作为一种促进设备负荷从而增加稳定性的机制?”以及“与标准宽度框架相比,超窄框架对稳定性有不利影响吗?”
十名使用前轮步行框架的老年人使用以下三种步行框架行走:1)“标准宽度,标准高度”,2)“标准宽度,低高度”,3)“窄宽度,标准高度”。使用智能步行器技术记录作用在步行框架和使用者鞋子内部的力,并且相机记录使用者的脚相对于框架脚的相对位置。计算使用者 - 框架系统的稳定性和设备负荷(转移到框架上的体重百分比)。使用一般线性混合效应模型进行统计分析。
较低的高度设置并未增加设备负荷和稳定性,因此将高度调整到较低设置被证明是增加稳定性的不成功机制。然而,在所有框架条件下设备负荷与稳定性呈正相关(p <0.05)。最后,与标准宽度框架相比,使用超窄框架行走时稳定性降低(p = 0.002)。
为了增加易跌倒使用者的稳定性,需要积极鼓励将体重转移到步行框架上。考虑到超窄框架对稳定性的不利影响,应谨慎开具此类框架并使用。