• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球心肌做功指数可预测非左束支传导阻滞患者对双心室起搏的反应。

Global myocardial work index predicts response to biventricular pacing in patients with non-left bundle branch block.

作者信息

Kondo Shun, Inden Yasuya, Yanagisawa Satoshi, Miyamae Kiichi, Miyazawa Hiroyuki, Goto Takayuki, Tachi Masaya, Iwawaki Tomoya, Yamauchi Ryota, Hiramatsu Kei, Shimojo Masafumi, Tsuji Yukiomi, Murohara Toyoaki

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):2210-2224. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15246. Epub 2025 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15246
PMID:39980210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12055361/
Abstract

AIMS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) and wide QRS complex. However, patients with non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) show a poor response to CRT. This study evaluated myocardial work estimated by pressure-strain loops on echocardiography for predicting response to CRT in patients with non-LBBB.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 267 patients who underwent CRT implantation, 54 patients with non-LBBB (mean age, 62 ± 12 years, 72% males, and 24% with ischemic cardiomyopathy) were retrospectively included. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed before and at 6-month follow-up in all patients. Myocardial work was estimated by pressure-strain loop analysis using speckle-tracking echocardiography and non-invasive blood pressure measurement. CRT response was defined as a ≥15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume on echocardiography at the 6-month follow-up. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before implantation was 27% ± 8% in total. Six months after implantation, 18 patients (33%) responded to CRT. The absolute LVEF improvement for responders and non-responders were 5.5% ± 6.9% and 1.3% ± 7.5%, respectively (P = 0.021). Baseline global work index (GWI), which is the average myocardial work based on the pressure-strain loop, was significantly higher in the responder group than in the non-responder group (590 ± 271 vs. 409 ± 216 mmHg%; P = 0.010). Multivariable analysis showed GWI to be an independent predictor of CRT response (odds ratio, 1.109; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.013-1.213; P = 0.024). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the cut-off value of GWI for response as 456 mmHg% (AUC 0.700, 95% CI 0.553-0.840; P = 0.019). During the median 37-month follow-up, all-cause death occurred in 21 patients (39%). On multivariable analysis, GWI ≤ 456 mmHg% was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 2.882; 95% CI, 1.157-7.176; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

High GWI assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography and a non-invasively estimated LV pressure curve was independently associated with a favourable response to CRT and improved outcomes in patients with non-LBBB. The use of this non-invasive approach for quantifying myocardial variability and residual contractility can be beneficial for assessing CRT candidates and allow for more accurate patient stratification. Further, large multicentre studies are required to validate these findings.

摘要

目的

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可改善心力衰竭(HF)合并宽QRS波群患者的预后。然而,非左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者对CRT反应较差。本研究评估了超声心动图压力-应变环估算的心肌做功,以预测非LBBB患者对CRT的反应。

方法与结果

在267例行CRT植入的患者中,回顾性纳入54例非LBBB患者(平均年龄62±12岁,男性占72%,缺血性心肌病患者占24%)。所有患者在植入前及随访6个月时均行二维斑点追踪超声心动图检查。采用斑点追踪超声心动图和无创血压测量,通过压力-应变环分析估算心肌做功。CRT反应定义为随访6个月时超声心动图测得的左心室收缩末期容积减少≥15%。植入前左心室射血分数(LVEF)平均为27%±8%。植入后6个月,18例患者(33%)对CRT有反应。有反应者和无反应者的LVEF绝对改善分别为5.5%±6.9%和1.3%±7.5%(P=0.021)。基于压力-应变环的平均心肌做功即基线整体做功指数(GWI),有反应组显著高于无反应组(590±271 vs. 409±216 mmHg%;P=0.010)。多变量分析显示GWI是CRT反应的独立预测因子(比值比,1.109;95%置信区间[CI],1.013-1.213;P=0.024)。受试者工作特征曲线分析确定GWI对反应的截断值为456 mmHg%(曲线下面积0.700,95% CI 0.553-0.840;P=0.019)。在中位37个月的随访期间,21例患者(39%)发生全因死亡。多变量分析显示GWI≤456 mmHg%与全因死亡风险增加独立相关(风险比,2.882;95% CI,1.157-7.176;P=0.023)。

结论

通过斑点追踪超声心动图和无创估算的左心室压力曲线评估的高GWI,与非LBBB患者对CRT的良好反应及改善的预后独立相关。使用这种无创方法量化心肌变异性和残余收缩力,有助于评估CRT候选患者,并实现更准确的患者分层。此外,需要大型多中心研究来验证这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/bf7433db8854/EHF2-12-2210-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/dd8a6d553687/EHF2-12-2210-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/7a8644f04864/EHF2-12-2210-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/e1b8aeb16d74/EHF2-12-2210-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/bf7433db8854/EHF2-12-2210-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/dd8a6d553687/EHF2-12-2210-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/7a8644f04864/EHF2-12-2210-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/e1b8aeb16d74/EHF2-12-2210-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afca/12055361/bf7433db8854/EHF2-12-2210-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Global myocardial work index predicts response to biventricular pacing in patients with non-left bundle branch block.全球心肌做功指数可预测非左束支传导阻滞患者对双心室起搏的反应。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):2210-2224. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15246. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
The Association of a classical left bundle Branch Block Contraction Pattern by vendor-independent strain echocardiography and outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy.通过独立于设备的应变超声心动图检测的典型左束支传导阻滞收缩模式与心脏再同步治疗后的预后之间的关联。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2019 May 21;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12947-019-0160-4.
3
Personalized cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by real-time electrocardiographic imaging for patients with non-left bundle branch block.实时心电图成像引导的非左束支阻滞患者个体化心脏再同步治疗。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jul;21(7):1047-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.027. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
4
Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.心脏再同步治疗植入时右向左心室激活延迟时间延长与左束支传导阻滞患者临床结局改善相关。
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):550-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv117. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with mild to moderately reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.心脏再同步治疗用于射血分数轻度至中度降低伴左束支传导阻滞的患者。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Nov;21(11):2250-2259. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.014. Epub 2024 May 19.
6
Relation of QRS Duration to Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞患者QRS波时限与心脏再同步治疗反应的关系
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1803-1808. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.043. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
New-onset left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction response to guideline-directed therapies: The NEOLITH study.新出现的左束支传导阻滞相关特发性非缺血性心肌病和左心室射血分数对指南指导治疗的反应:NEOLITH 研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Apr;13(4):933-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.12.020. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
8
Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block.真性左束支传导阻滞患者经左束支区域起搏实现心脏再同步治疗的显著疗效。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1460-1468. doi: 10.1002/clc.23462. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Left ventricular dimensions predict risk of appropriate shocks but not mortality in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients with left bundle-branch block and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.左心室维度可预测左束支传导阻滞和非缺血性心肌病的心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者的适当电击风险,但不能预测死亡率。
Europace. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1689-1694. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw323.
10
T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.T波面积可预测左束支传导阻滞患者对心脏再同步治疗的反应。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):176-83. doi: 10.1111/jce.12549. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of speckle tracking echocardiography beyond current guidelines in cardiac resynchronization therapy.斑点追踪超声心动图在心脏再同步治疗中的作用超越现行指南。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 May 1;402:131885. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131885. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
2
Dyssynchrony and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Unfavorable Electrical Characteristics.心力衰竭患者电生理特征不良与心脏再同步治疗反应的不协调性。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Jul;16(7):873-884. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.023. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
3
The '10 commandments' for the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2021 Nov 7;42(42):4295. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab699.
4
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364.
5
JCS/JHRS 2019 guideline on non-pharmacotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2019年心律失常非药物治疗指南》
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jun 2;37(4):709-870. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12491. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.心脏再同步治疗的左束支区域起搏:国际左束支区域起搏协作研究组的结果
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;7(2):135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
7
Imaging predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular work asymmetry by echocardiography and septal viability by cardiac magnetic resonance.超声心动图左心室做功不对称性和心脏磁共振室间隔活力预测心脏再同步治疗反应的影像学指标。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 14;41(39):3813-3823. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa603.
8
Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy for Nonspecific Intraventricular Conduction Delay Versus Right Bundle Branch Block.心脏再同步除颤器治疗非特异性室内传导延迟与右束支传导阻滞。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3082-3099. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.025.
9
Myocardial constructive work and cardiac mortality in resynchronization therapy candidates.再同步化治疗候选者的心肌做功和心脏死亡率。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jun;212:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
10
QRS Area Is a Strong Determinant of Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.QRS 面积是心脏再同步治疗结局的重要决定因素。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;11(12):e006497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006497.