Shorkey C T, Armendariz J
J Clin Psychol. 1985 May;41(3):414-21. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198505)41:3<414::aid-jclp2270410319>3.0.co;2-5.
Eighteen mothers identified as the perpetrator of physical abuse of their children were matched with respect to race, income and educational level with control mothers of children in daycare centers. Tests included: The Sense of Personal Worth Scale of the California Test of Personality, the Srole Anomia Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, three scales from the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory and the Rational Behavior Inventory (RBI). An overall MANOVA was performed on scores of the seven personality measures. Stepdown F-tests were conducted on scores of the seven test measures. With the RBI entered first, none of the subsequent variables was significant. Three variables (RBI, Negativism and Anomia) significantly discriminated between the abuse and control groups. Examination of the discriminant function coefficients revealed that the RBI was the most important contributing variable.
18名被认定为对自己孩子实施身体虐待的母亲，在种族、收入和教育水平方面与日托中心孩子的对照母亲进行了匹配。测试包括：加利福尼亚人格测试中的个人价值感量表、斯罗尔失范量表、罗森伯格自尊量表、布斯-杜克敌意量表中的三个量表以及理性行为量表（RBI）。对这七项人格测量的得分进行了总体多变量方差分析。对这七项测试测量的得分进行了逐步F检验。首先纳入RBI后，后续变量均无显著性。三个变量（RBI、消极主义和失范）在虐待组和对照组之间有显著差异。对判别函数系数的检查表明，RBI是最重要的贡献变量。
