Shorkey C T
J Clin Psychol. 1980 Jul;36(3):817-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198007)36:3<817::aid-jclp2270360341>3.0.co;2-h.
Matched a group of 14 abusing mothers with an equal number of control mothers on race, educational level, income, and marital status. Their scores were compared on three personality scales, the Sense of Personal Worth Scale of the California Test of Personality, the Srole Anomia scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale. A significant difference (p < .05) was found between the groups on the Sense of Personal Worth scale; control mothers reported stronger feelings of personal worth based on their perceptions of others' evaluations of them. The difference between the groups approached significance (p < .07) on the Anomia scale, with abusing mothers scoring higher on feelings of social alienation. On the Self-Esteem scale, which indicates personal feelings of worth independent of the evaluations of others, no significant differences were found between groups. Correlation coefficients also were computed among scores obtained by the abusing mothers on the personality scales. Implications of these findings related to child welfare work with abusing mothers are discussed.
选取了14名虐待孩子的母亲组成一组,将她们与数量相等的对照母亲在种族、教育水平、收入和婚姻状况方面进行匹配。比较了她们在三种人格量表上的得分,这三种量表分别是加利福尼亚人格测试中的个人价值感量表、斯罗尔失范量表和罗森伯格自尊量表。在个人价值感量表上,两组之间存在显著差异(p < .05);对照母亲基于她们对他人对自己评价的认知,报告了更强的个人价值感。在失范量表上,两组之间的差异接近显著水平(p < .07),虐待孩子的母亲在社会疏离感方面得分更高。在自尊量表上,该量表表明个人的价值感独立于他人的评价,两组之间未发现显著差异。还计算了虐待孩子的母亲在人格量表上获得的分数之间的相关系数。讨论了这些发现对与虐待孩子的母亲开展儿童福利工作的启示。