Suppr超能文献

多维自我报告愤怒和敌意测量方法的有效性。

The validity of multidimensional self-report anger and hostility measures.

作者信息

Riley W T, Treiber F A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1989 May;45(3):397-404. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198905)45:3<397::aid-jclp2270450308>3.0.co;2-4.

Abstract

The present study assessed the convergent and discriminant validity of multidimensional measures of anger and hostility and validated abbreviated neurotic and reactive hostility subscales of the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory. A sample of 120 adults were administered the abbreviated Buss Durkee Reaction (RH) and Neurotic Hostility (NH) subscales, State-Trait Anger Scale (ST), Anger Self-Report General (ASRG) subscale, Multidimensional Anger Inventory (MAI), and Framingham Anger-in (FI), Anger-out (FO), and Discuss (FD) scales. An intercorrelation matrix supported the convergent and discriminant validity of these measures except for the Anger-in/Brood subscale of the MAI and the FO scale. Factor analysis of the scales resulted in three factors: anger experience/hostility, verbal/adaptive anger expression, and maladaptive/physical anger expression. Implications for future research on anger assessment, specifically the components of anger experience and anger expression or suppression, were discussed.

摘要

本研究评估了愤怒和敌意多维测量的收敛效度和区分效度,并验证了布斯-杜克敌意量表中简化的神经质和反应性敌意分量表。对120名成年人的样本施测了简化的布斯-杜克反应性敌意(RH)和神经质敌意(NH)分量表、状态-特质愤怒量表(ST)、愤怒自评综合(ASRG)分量表、多维愤怒量表(MAI)以及弗雷明汉愤怒内向(FI)、愤怒外向(FO)和讨论(FD)量表。除了MAI的愤怒内向/沉思分量表和FO量表外,一个相互关联矩阵支持了这些测量的收敛效度和区分效度。对这些量表进行因子分析得出了三个因子:愤怒体验/敌意、言语/适应性愤怒表达以及适应不良/身体愤怒表达。讨论了对未来愤怒评估研究的启示,特别是愤怒体验以及愤怒表达或抑制的组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验