Riley W T, Treiber F A
Department of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912.
J Clin Psychol. 1989 May;45(3):397-404. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198905)45:3<397::aid-jclp2270450308>3.0.co;2-4.
The present study assessed the convergent and discriminant validity of multidimensional measures of anger and hostility and validated abbreviated neurotic and reactive hostility subscales of the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory. A sample of 120 adults were administered the abbreviated Buss Durkee Reaction (RH) and Neurotic Hostility (NH) subscales, State-Trait Anger Scale (ST), Anger Self-Report General (ASRG) subscale, Multidimensional Anger Inventory (MAI), and Framingham Anger-in (FI), Anger-out (FO), and Discuss (FD) scales. An intercorrelation matrix supported the convergent and discriminant validity of these measures except for the Anger-in/Brood subscale of the MAI and the FO scale. Factor analysis of the scales resulted in three factors: anger experience/hostility, verbal/adaptive anger expression, and maladaptive/physical anger expression. Implications for future research on anger assessment, specifically the components of anger experience and anger expression or suppression, were discussed.
本研究评估了愤怒和敌意多维测量的收敛效度和区分效度，并验证了布斯-杜克敌意量表中简化的神经质和反应性敌意分量表。对120名成年人的样本施测了简化的布斯-杜克反应性敌意（RH）和神经质敌意（NH）分量表、状态-特质愤怒量表（ST）、愤怒自评综合（ASRG）分量表、多维愤怒量表（MAI）以及弗雷明汉愤怒内向（FI）、愤怒外向（FO）和讨论（FD）量表。除了MAI的愤怒内向/沉思分量表和FO量表外，一个相互关联矩阵支持了这些测量的收敛效度和区分效度。对这些量表进行因子分析得出了三个因子：愤怒体验/敌意、言语/适应性愤怒表达以及适应不良/身体愤怒表达。讨论了对未来愤怒评估研究的启示，特别是愤怒体验以及愤怒表达或抑制的组成部分。
