• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁来施以援手?新冠疫情之前、期间及之后欧洲老年人的非正式支持来源。

Who came to the rescue? Sources of informal support to older Europeans before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Gonçalves Judite, Weaver France

机构信息

Imperial College London School of Public Health, White City Campus, 90 Wood Lane, London W12 0BZ, UK.

NOVA University Lisbon NOVA School of Business and Economics, Campus de Carcavelos, Rua da Holanda, 12775-405 Carcavelos, Portugal.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf034.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afaf034
PMID:39982003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11843440/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the provision of informal care in major ways. This study documents the prevalences of informal support with (instrumental) activities of daily living (IADL and ADL) before, during and after the pandemic, distinguishing between children, other relatives and friends/neighbours and focusing on individuals 50 years and older across 27 European countries.

METHODS

This longitudinal analysis relies on the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)'s Wave 8 (2019), two Corona surveys (2020 and 2021) and Wave 9 (2022). Linear probability models adjusted for individual fixed effects and time-varying confounders were used to estimate prevalences of informal support over time.

RESULTS

During the pandemic, the prevalences of informal support with both IADL and ADL from all three groups of caregivers increased significantly (P < 0.01), to return to their pre-pandemic levels by 2022. For example, the adjusted likelihood of IADL help from children increased from 18.5% (2019) to 36.6% (2020) and 42.5% (2021), then dropped back to 19.7% in 2022. Friends and neighbours played a critical role, with the adjusted likelihood of IADL help going from 8.8% (2019) to 29.7% (2020), then down to 18% (2021) and 8.9% (2022).

CONCLUSIONS

Future emergency and disaster preparedness plans should contemplate the various sources of informal care, including support measures to non-relative caregivers, as those helpers may be able to rapidly respond to unexpected crisis.

摘要

背景/目的:新冠疫情在很大程度上扰乱了非正式照料的提供。本研究记录了疫情之前、期间和之后在日常生活(IADL和ADL)的(工具性)活动方面获得非正式支持的比例,区分了子女、其他亲属以及朋友/邻居,并聚焦于27个欧洲国家中50岁及以上的人群。

方法

这项纵向分析依赖于欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE)的第8轮调查(2019年)、两轮新冠疫情调查(2020年和2021年)以及第9轮调查(2022年)。使用针对个体固定效应和随时间变化的混杂因素进行调整的线性概率模型来估计不同时间点非正式支持的比例。

结果

在疫情期间,来自所有三组照料者的在IADL和ADL方面提供非正式支持的比例均显著增加(P<0.01),到2022年恢复到疫情前的水平。例如,子女提供IADL帮助的调整后可能性从2019年的18.5%增加到2020年的36.6%和2021年的42.5%,然后在2022年回落至19.7%。朋友和邻居发挥了关键作用,提供IADL帮助的调整后可能性从2019年的8.8%升至2020年的29.7%,然后降至2021年的18%和2022年的8.9%。

结论

未来的应急和备灾计划应考虑到非正式照料的各种来源,包括针对非亲属照料者的支持措施,因为这些帮助者可能能够迅速应对意外危机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e976/11843440/5b9ef0d06dfb/afaf034f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e976/11843440/c8b30673fd82/afaf034f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e976/11843440/5b9ef0d06dfb/afaf034f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e976/11843440/c8b30673fd82/afaf034f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e976/11843440/5b9ef0d06dfb/afaf034f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Who came to the rescue? Sources of informal support to older Europeans before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.谁来施以援手?新冠疫情之前、期间及之后欧洲老年人的非正式支持来源。
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf034.
2
Difficulty and help with activities of daily living among older adults living alone during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country population-based study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间独居老年人的日常生活活动困难与帮助:一项基于多国人口的研究
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 4;22(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02799-w.
3
Volunteering and instrumental support during the first phase of the pandemic in Europe: the significance of COVID-19 exposure and stringent country's COVID-19 policy.在欧洲大流行的第一阶段,志愿者和工具性支持:COVID-19 暴露和严格的国家 COVID-19 政策的意义。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17507-5.
4
The role of migration status in the link between ADL/IADL and informal as well as formal care in Germany: Findings of the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe.移民身份在德国日常生活活动/工具性日常生活活动与非正式及正式照料之间联系中的作用:欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查结果
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jul-Aug;101:104669. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104669. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Influence of physical exercise on activities of daily living in older adults: an empirical analysis based on propensity score matching and difference-in-differences.体育锻炼对老年人日常生活活动的影响:基于倾向得分匹配和双重差分法的实证分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;13:1463348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1463348. eCollection 2025.
6
The consequences of COVID-19 lockdown for formal and informal resource utilization among home-dwelling people with dementia: results from the prospective PAN.DEM study.COVID-19 封锁对居家痴呆症患者正规和非正规资源利用的影响:前瞻性 PAN.DEM 研究结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07041-8.
7
Patterns and predictors of formal and informal care among elderly persons living in board and care homes.居住在寄宿护理院的老年人接受正式和非正式护理的模式及预测因素。
Gerontologist. 1999 Apr;39(2):167-76. doi: 10.1093/geront/39.2.167.
8
The family as provider of intergenerational support during COVID-19: a study into the mental health consequences for 65+ Europeans.家庭在 COVID-19 期间提供代际支持:对 65 岁以上欧洲人心理健康影响的研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 21;12:1418472. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1418472. eCollection 2024.
9
The Impact of COVID-19 on Informal Caregiving and Care Receiving Across Europe During the First Phase of the Pandemic.新冠疫情对欧洲在大流行第一阶段中非正式照护和照护接受的影响。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;9:673874. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.673874. eCollection 2021.
10
Socioeconomic inequalities in activities of daily living limitations and in the provision of informal and formal care for noninstitutionalized older Brazilians: National Health Survey, 2013.2013年巴西全国健康调查:非机构化老年人日常生活活动受限情况以及非正式和正式照料提供方面的社会经济不平等
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 17;15(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0429-2.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the care economy? A scoping review on current evidence, challenges, facilitators and future opportunities.什么是护理经济?关于当前证据、挑战、促进因素及未来机遇的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1540009. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1540009. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the cross-national impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care received by community-dwelling older adults in 2020 and 2021: restoring formal home care versus polarizing informal care?比较2020年和2021年新冠疫情对社区居住老年人所获照护的跨国影响:恢复正规居家照护还是使非正规照护两极分化?
Eur J Ageing. 2024 Jan 24;21(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s10433-024-00800-6.
2
Informal care, older people, and COVID-19: Evidence from the UK.非正式照护、老年人与新冠疫情:来自英国的证据。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Jan;205:468-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
3
The Landscape of State Policies Supporting Family Caregivers as Aligned With the National Academy of Medicine Recommendations.
支持家庭护老者的国家政策格局与国家医学科学院建议保持一致。
Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):854-878. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12567. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
A qualitative 5-country comparison of the perceived impacts of COVID-19 on people living with dementia and unpaid carers.一项关于新冠疫情对痴呆症患者及非专业照料者感知影响的五国定性比较研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 11;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02821-1.
5
The consequences of COVID-19 lockdown for formal and informal resource utilization among home-dwelling people with dementia: results from the prospective PAN.DEM study.COVID-19 封锁对居家痴呆症患者正规和非正规资源利用的影响:前瞻性 PAN.DEM 研究结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07041-8.
6
The Impact of COVID-19 on Informal Caregiving and Care Receiving Across Europe During the First Phase of the Pandemic.新冠疫情对欧洲在大流行第一阶段中非正式照护和照护接受的影响。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;9:673874. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.673874. eCollection 2021.
7
Long-term care at home and female work during the COVID-19 pandemic.疫情期间的家庭长期护理和女性工作
Health Policy. 2021 Jul;125(7):859-868. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Help From and Help to Neighbors Among Older Adults in Europe.欧洲老年人之间的邻里互助:给予与获得帮助
Front Sociol. 2019 May 30;4:46. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00046. eCollection 2019.
9
Care in times of COVID-19: the impact of the pandemic on informal caregiving in Austria.新冠疫情期间的照料:疫情对奥地利非正式照料的影响。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Mar 12;18(2):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00611-z. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
The social support networks of elderly people in Slovenia during the Covid-19 pandemic.斯洛文尼亚老年人在新冠疫情期间的社会支持网络。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0247993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247993. eCollection 2021.