• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

什么是护理经济?关于当前证据、挑战、促进因素及未来机遇的范围综述。

What is the care economy? A scoping review on current evidence, challenges, facilitators and future opportunities.

作者信息

Blackberry I, Boak J, Barclay K, Khalil H

机构信息

Care Economy Research Institute, La Trobe University, Albury-Wodonga, VIC, Australia.

John Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Albury-Wodonga, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1540009. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1540009. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1540009
PMID:40438065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12116328/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The care economy gained its prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic. The value and impact of caregiving, mostly shouldered by women, was not as visible until such crisis point. Health care and social support sectors represent the largest and fastest growing industry globally. This scoping review aims to elucidate the current state of play in the care economy, where there is a great reliance on informal and formal care workforce to deliver care for populations across all age groups and abilities.

METHODS

Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-SCR reporting guidance, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Campbell collaboration database, Social Science Abstracts, Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) and Scopus. Quantitative and qualitative original research on disability, aged care, early childhood education and care, rural, veterans, migrants and informal and formal care workforce from January 2018 until November 2023 were examined.

RESULTS

Of 354 studies selected, 20% were from the United States of America, 11% each were from China and the United Kingdom. Most studies employed cross-sectional design. A quarter of the studies included adults aged 65 years and above while 6% were adults aged 18 to 64 years. These age groups combined were included in an additional 27% of studies. Women were overrepresented in 70% of the studies. Nearly two-thirds of caregivers were spouses or partners. Barriers to providing care were lack of education, support and monitoring of caregiver well-being, loss of income or ability to earn money, reduced social life and increased out-of-pocket costs. Gaps in research included migrant populations' contribution to the care economy, gender and diversity inequality in the care economy. The care economy could be improved through providing education for caregivers, care workforce engaging with caregivers in the care plan, and governments' overhaul of compensation for caregivers through direct financial support and employment benefits.

CONCLUSION

The care economy is an emerging research area. There continues to be a paucity of research evidence across some geographical areas. Studies are mostly short term or small scale with very little evidence around the value of care. Given the growing aging population, more research is needed to elucidate the positive aspects of caring by formal and informal care workforce to the population, society and economy.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (10.17605). "Definitions, key themes and aspects of the care economy-a scoping review protocol," https://osf.io/ypmuh.

摘要

背景

护理经济在新冠疫情期间受到了广泛关注。护理工作的价值和影响,主要由女性承担,直到危机时刻才变得明显。医疗保健和社会支持部门是全球最大且增长最快的行业。本综述旨在阐明护理经济的现状,在这一领域,为所有年龄组和能力的人群提供护理严重依赖非正式和正式护理人员。

方法

遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的方法和PRISMA-SCR报告指南,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、坎贝尔协作数据库、社会科学文摘、图书馆与信息科学文摘(LISA)和Scopus。对2018年1月至2023年11月期间关于残疾、老年护理、幼儿教育与护理、农村、退伍军人、移民以及非正式和正式护理人员的定量和定性原始研究进行了审查。

结果

在筛选出的354项研究中,20%来自美国,中国和英国各占11%。大多数研究采用横断面设计。四分之一的研究纳入了65岁及以上的成年人,6%的研究纳入了18至64岁的成年人。这两个年龄组合计又被纳入了27%的研究。70%的研究中女性占比过高。近三分之二的护理人员是配偶或伴侣。提供护理的障碍包括缺乏教育、对护理人员福祉的支持和监测、收入或赚钱能力的丧失、社交生活减少以及自付费用增加。研究空白包括移民人口对护理经济的贡献、护理经济中的性别和多样性不平等。通过为护理人员提供教育、护理人员在护理计划中与护理对象互动以及政府通过直接财政支持和就业福利对护理人员薪酬进行全面改革,可以改善护理经济。

结论

护理经济是一个新兴的研究领域。一些地理区域的研究证据仍然匮乏。研究大多是短期或小规模的,关于护理价值的证据很少。鉴于人口老龄化加剧,需要更多研究来阐明正式和非正式护理人员的护理工作对人口、社会和经济的积极方面。

方案注册

该方案已在开放科学框架(10.17605)注册。“护理经济的定义、关键主题和方面——一项范围综述方案”,https://osf.io/ypmuh 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1015/12116328/270548f8a030/fpubh-13-1540009-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1015/12116328/b7f9b05298a8/fpubh-13-1540009-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1015/12116328/270548f8a030/fpubh-13-1540009-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1015/12116328/b7f9b05298a8/fpubh-13-1540009-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1015/12116328/270548f8a030/fpubh-13-1540009-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
What is the care economy? A scoping review on current evidence, challenges, facilitators and future opportunities.什么是护理经济?关于当前证据、挑战、促进因素及未来机遇的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1540009. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1540009. eCollection 2025.
2
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
8
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
9
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

1
Who came to the rescue? Sources of informal support to older Europeans before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.谁来施以援手?新冠疫情之前、期间及之后欧洲老年人的非正式支持来源。
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf034.
2
How do policies promote the sustainable development of older-adult care industry? A configuration analysis based on policy tools.政策如何促进老年护理产业的可持续发展?基于政策工具的配置分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 11;12:1430679. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1430679. eCollection 2024.
3
Gender Differences in Family Caregiving. Do female caregivers do more or undertake different tasks?
性别差异与家庭照料。女性照料者做的多还是承担的任务不同?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11191-w.
4
Differences across the lifespan between females and males in the top 20 causes of disease burden globally: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球疾病负担研究2021中全球疾病负担前20位原因的性别差异:一项系统分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 May;9(5):e282-e294. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00053-7.
5
Understanding caregiver burden from multiple perspectives: dyadic agreement between caregiver and care recipient.从多个角度理解照顾者负担:照顾者和被照顾者之间的双重一致性。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jun;33(6):1719-1734. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03643-x. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
6
The Positive and Negatives of Caregiving for Older Adults During Coronavirus Disease 2019: Identifying Opportunities for Advancing Social, Health, and Economic Policies.2019年冠状病毒病期间照顾老年人的利弊:确定推进社会、健康和经济政策的机会
Public Policy Aging Rep. 2022 Sep 15:prac018. doi: 10.1093/ppar/prac018.
7
"Being an informal caregiver - strengthening resources": mixed methods evaluation of a psychoeducational intervention supporting informal caregivers in palliative care.“作为非正规照护者——强化资源”:支持姑息治疗中非正式照护者的心理教育干预的混合方法评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 11;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01428-0.
8
Insights Into Informal Caregivers' Well-being: A Longitudinal Analysis of Care Intensity, Care Location, and Care Relationship.深入了解非正式照护者的福祉:照护强度、照护地点和照护关系的纵向分析。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Feb 1;79(2). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad166.
9
Factors Impacting Retention of Aged Care Workers: A Systematic Review.影响老年护理工作者留用率的因素:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;11(23):3008. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11233008.
10
Time use studies, time, temporality, and measuring care: Conceptual, methodological, and epistemological issues.时间使用研究、时间、时间性与护理测量:概念、方法及认识论问题
Time Soc. 2023 Nov;32(4):361-366. doi: 10.1177/0961463X231208981. Epub 2023 Oct 30.