• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非正式照护、老年人与新冠疫情:来自英国的证据。

Informal care, older people, and COVID-19: Evidence from the UK.

作者信息

Madia Joan E, Moscone Francesco, Nicodemo Catia

机构信息

Nuffield College and Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford and FBK-IRVAPP, New Rd, Oxford OX1 1NF, United Kingdom.

Brunel University London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Jan;205:468-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.11.020
PMID:36447784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9684107/
Abstract

The negative health effects and mortality caused by the COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately fell upon older and disabled people. Protecting these vulnerable groups has been a key policy priority throughout the pandemic and related vaccination campaigns. Using data from the latest survey of the UK Household Longitudinal Study on COVID-19 we found that people who receive informal care have higher probability of being infected when compared to those not receiving informal care. Further, we found that care recipients who are in the lowest income groups have a higher probability of catching the virus when compared to those in the highest income groups. We also estimated the likelihood of being infected for informal carers versus those who did not provide any care during the pandemic and found no significant differences between these two groups. Our empirical findings suggest that the standard measures introduced with the aim of protecting vulnerable groups, such as closing care homes or prioritising the vaccination of their staff, were not sufficient to avoid the spread of the virus amongst disabled and older people. Informal carers play an important role in the social care sector. As such, protecting vulnerable people by investing in the informal care sector should be a priority for future health policy.

摘要

新冠疫情造成的负面健康影响和死亡 disproportionately 落在了老年人和残疾人身上。在整个疫情及相关疫苗接种活动期间,保护这些弱势群体一直是关键的政策优先事项。利用英国家庭纵向研究关于新冠疫情的最新调查数据,我们发现,与未接受非正式护理的人相比,接受非正式护理的人感染的可能性更高。此外,我们发现,与高收入群体中的护理接受者相比,低收入群体中的护理接受者感染病毒的可能性更高。我们还估计了疫情期间非正式护理人员与未提供任何护理的人员被感染的可能性,发现这两组之间没有显著差异。我们的实证研究结果表明,为保护弱势群体而采取的标准措施,如关闭养老院或优先为其工作人员接种疫苗,不足以避免病毒在残疾人和老年人中传播。非正式护理人员在社会护理部门发挥着重要作用。因此,通过投资非正式护理部门来保护弱势群体应成为未来卫生政策的优先事项。

注

原文中“disproportionately”未翻译完整,可译为“不成比例地” 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/2ff09124aa22/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/2e8b134afbae/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/6d940f1f2d1f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/1908fb1ad6d9/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/d91061175dbe/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/6d85e083d166/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/45aa8d67fa11/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/d4884e6318ef/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/59b5100d8749/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/843bb63d5600/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/2ff09124aa22/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/2e8b134afbae/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/6d940f1f2d1f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/1908fb1ad6d9/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/d91061175dbe/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/6d85e083d166/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/45aa8d67fa11/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/d4884e6318ef/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/59b5100d8749/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/843bb63d5600/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa6/9684107/2ff09124aa22/gr10_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Informal care, older people, and COVID-19: Evidence from the UK.非正式照护、老年人与新冠疫情:来自英国的证据。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Jan;205:468-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
2
COVID-19 and community-based care services: Experiences of people living with dementia and their informal carers in Italy.COVID-19 与社区护理服务:意大利痴呆症患者及其非正规照护者的体验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e3128-e3137. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13758. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
3
Income-Related Inequalities in Informal Care: Evidence From the Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey in China.收入相关的非正式护理不平等:来自中国健康长寿纵向调查的证据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Sep 13;76(8):1691-1696. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab043.
4
A multi-centre survey among informal carers who manage medication for older care recipients: problems experienced and development of services.一项针对为老年护理对象管理药物的非正式护理人员的多中心调查:所经历的问题及服务发展情况。
Health Soc Care Community. 2003 Mar;11(2):138-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00415.x.
5
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2022-2023)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2022—2023年)》
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 6;56(10):1356-1386. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220825-00840.
6
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2022-2023)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2022—2023年)》
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 10;43(10):1515-1544. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220825-00734.
7
The Experiences of People with Dementia and Informal Carers Related to the Closure of Social and Medical Services in Poland during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Qualitative Study.新冠疫情期间波兰痴呆症患者及非正式照料者与社会和医疗服务关闭相关的经历——一项定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 3;9(12):1677. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121677.
8
How Did the COVID-19 Restrictions Impact People Living With Dementia and Their Informal Carers Within Community and Residential Aged Care Settings in Australia? A Qualitative Study.新冠疫情限制措施对澳大利亚社区及老年护理机构中痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者有何影响?一项定性研究。
J Fam Nurs. 2022 Aug;28(3):205-218. doi: 10.1177/10748407221101638. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
9
A qualitative 5-country comparison of the perceived impacts of COVID-19 on people living with dementia and unpaid carers.一项关于新冠疫情对痴呆症患者及非专业照料者感知影响的五国定性比较研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 11;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02821-1.
10
COVID-19 and UK family carers: policy implications.COVID-19 与英国家庭照顾者:政策影响。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;8(10):929-936. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00206-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Who came to the rescue? Sources of informal support to older Europeans before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.谁来施以援手?新冠疫情之前、期间及之后欧洲老年人的非正式支持来源。
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf034.
2
Predictors of Deterioration in Mental Well-Being and Quality of Life among Family Caregivers and Older People with Long-Term Care Needs during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间有长期护理需求的家庭照顾者和老年人心理健康及生活质量恶化的预测因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;12(3):383. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030383.
3
The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses.

本文引用的文献

1
Excess years of life lost to COVID-19 and other causes of death by sex, neighbourhood deprivation, and region in England and Wales during 2020: A registry-based study.2020 年英格兰和威尔士因 COVID-19 和其他死因导致的超额寿命损失及其与性别、社区贫困程度和地区的关系:一项基于登记的研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Feb 15;19(2):e1003904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003904. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Tracking the mental health of home-carers during the first COVID-19 national lockdown: evidence from a nationally representative UK survey.追踪首次新冠全国封锁期间居家护理者的心理健康:来自英国全国代表性调查的证据。
Psychol Med. 2023 Feb;53(3):1096-1105. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002555. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
3
非正式照护的概念:其科学与政治用途中的模糊性与争议。
Front Sociol. 2023 Jul 18;8:1195790. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1195790. eCollection 2023.
The presence of care homes and excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Italy.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间养老院的存在与超额死亡:来自意大利的证据。
Health Econ. 2021 Jul;30(7):1703-1710. doi: 10.1002/hec.4277. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Excess mortality for care home residents during the first 23 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a national cohort study.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行的前 23 周养老院居民的超额死亡率:一项全国队列研究。
BMC Med. 2021 Mar 5;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01945-2.
5
How does vulnerability to COVID-19 vary between communities in England? Developing a Small Area Vulnerability Index (SAVI).英格兰各社区对 COVID-19 的脆弱性有何不同?开发小区域脆弱性指数 (SAVI)。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Aug;75(8):729-734. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215227. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Measuring geographical disparities in England at the time of COVID-19: results using a composite indicator of population vulnerability.衡量 COVID-19 时期英格兰的地理差异:使用人口脆弱性综合指标得出的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 29;10(9):e039749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039749.
7
Impact of COVID-19 related social support service closures on people with dementia and unpaid carers: a qualitative study.新冠疫情相关社会支持服务关闭对痴呆症患者和无薪照护者的影响:一项定性研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Jul;25(7):1281-1288. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1822292. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
COVID-19 and Inequalities.新冠疫情与不平等现象
Fisc Stud. 2020 Jun;41(2):291-319. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12232. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY.使用 OpenSAFELY 分析与 COVID-19 相关死亡的因素。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):430-436. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
10
Has COVID-19 subverted global health?新冠病毒颠覆了全球健康状况吗?
Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1687-1688. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31089-8. Epub 2020 May 5.