Page Joanne S, Edgar Dale W, Grisbrook Tiffany L, Jacques Angela, Gittings Paul M, Wood Fiona M, Brade Carly J
School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
State Adult Burn Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Eur Burn J. 2025 Jan 30;6(1):4. doi: 10.3390/ebj6010004.
Measuring exercise intensity for safety and to inform prescription in acute burn survivors, is challenging. This study aimed to assess the validity of adult patient end-of-workout rating of session perceived exertion (sRPE); and calculated training load (TL) (sRPE × session duration) as measures of exercise intensity. Secondly, the study aimed to compare clinician and patient perception of exercise effort during physiotherapist-led sessions. Repeated RPE data were collected every 5-min during two resistance exercise sessions completed by 25 burns patients. Physiological (heart rate [HR], blood lactate [BLa]) and perceptual measures (sRPE, ratings of pain, fatigue, delayed onset muscle soreness, sleep quality and stress) were also captured. Adjusted, multivariable linear regression models were used to determine the associations between sRPE and TL and significant predictor variables. Paired -tests were performed to compare clinician and participant sRPE. Results: Average RPE calculated from 5-min repeats, after adjustment for age and %TBSA, was significantly associated with sRPE, (1, 45) = 100.82, ( < 0.001, adjusted = 0.64) and TL, (1, 45) = 33.66, ( < 0.001, adjusted = 0.39). No significant differences between patient and clinician sRPE were apparent ( = 0.948). Thus, one-off reporting of sRPE and calculated TL may be appropriate markers to monitor exercise intensity and aid prescription in individuals with burn injuries, regardless of patient and burn characteristics or time since burn. There was also no difference between patient and clinician's perceptions of exercise effort.
对于急性烧伤幸存者而言,为确保安全并为运动处方提供依据而测量运动强度颇具挑战性。本研究旨在评估成年患者锻炼结束时的主观用力感觉评分(sRPE)的有效性;并计算训练负荷(TL)(sRPE×训练时长)作为运动强度的衡量指标。其次,本研究旨在比较在物理治疗师主导的训练课程中临床医生与患者对运动强度的感知。在25名烧伤患者完成的两次抗阻训练课程中,每隔5分钟收集一次重复的RPE数据。同时还采集了生理指标(心率[HR]、血乳酸[BLa])和感知指标(sRPE、疼痛评分(即疼痛等级)、疲劳、延迟性肌肉酸痛、睡眠质量和压力)。使用调整后的多变量线性回归模型来确定sRPE与TL之间的关联以及显著的预测变量。进行配对t检验以比较临床医生和参与者的sRPE。结果:在对年龄和烧伤总面积百分比进行调整后,从5分钟重复测量值计算出的平均RPE与sRPE显著相关,(1, 45) = 100.82,(P < 0.001,调整后R² = 0.64)以及与TL显著相关,(1, 45) = 33.66,(P < 0.001,调整后R² = 0.39)。患者与临床医生的sRPE之间无明显差异(P = 0.948)。因此,一次性报告sRPE和计算得出的TL可能是监测烧伤患者运动强度并辅助制定运动处方的合适指标,无论患者的烧伤特征如何或烧伤后的时间长短。患者与临床医生对运动强度的感知也没有差异。