• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

热胁迫下籼稻和粳稻根系的比较转录组学揭示了OsMAPK3在热响应中的关键作用。

Comparative transcriptomics of indica and japonica rice roots under heat stress reveals the crucial role of OsMAPK3 in heat response.

作者信息

Deng Yaqin, Zhu Zhikai, Chen Jian, Kuang Liuhui, Yan Tao, Li Lin, Wu Dezhi, Gao Fei

机构信息

College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China; Yuelushan Laboratory, Changsha, 410128, China.

College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China; Yuelushan Laboratory, Changsha, 410128, China.

出版信息

Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025 Apr;221:109668. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109668. Epub 2025 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109668
PMID:39983604
Abstract

Heat stress is one of the most critical environmental factors impacting rice cultivation, driven by the rising global temperatures. Therefore, understanding the differences in molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance between rice cultivars, particularly indica and japonica, is crucial for developing heat-tolerant varieties. In this study, high throughput RNA-sequencing technology was utilized to explore the transcriptomic changes in the root tissues of two rice varieties, 93-11 (indica) and ZH11 (japonica) under heat stress and during recovery. Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) analysis revealed that ZH11 had 14,719 DEGs after the two-day heat treatment, and 10,178 DEGs during the recovery process. In contrast, 93-11 had a lower number of DEGs than ZH11 in both the heat treatment and recovery phases, with 12,433 DEGs and 5986 DEGs, respectively. The GO and KEGG analyses showed that the two rice varieties shared several enriched pathways in response to heat stress. However, each cultivar also had its own uniquely enriched pathways, reflecting distinct responses to heat stress in ZH11 and 93-11. In addition, WGCNA analysis highlighted that the OsMAPK3 is novel hub gene in response to heat stress in rice. Knockout of OsMAPK3 compromises rice heat stress tolerance. These results provide new insights into the differences in molecular mechanisms of heat stress response in roots between indica and japonica rice cultivars, offering valuable targets for genetic improvement and breeding programs aimed at developing heat-tolerant rice varieties.

摘要

热胁迫是影响水稻种植的最关键环境因素之一,这是由全球气温上升所驱动的。因此,了解水稻品种特别是籼稻和粳稻之间耐热胁迫分子机制的差异,对于培育耐热品种至关重要。在本研究中,利用高通量RNA测序技术探究了两个水稻品种93-11(籼稻)和ZH11(粳稻)在热胁迫及恢复过程中根组织的转录组变化。差异表达基因(DEG)分析显示,经过两天热处理后,ZH11有14719个差异表达基因,恢复过程中有10178个差异表达基因。相比之下,93-11在热处理和恢复阶段的差异表达基因数量均低于ZH11,分别为12433个和5986个。基因本体(GO)和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)分析表明,这两个水稻品种在应对热胁迫时共有几个富集途径。然而,每个品种也有其独特的富集途径,反映了ZH11和93-11对热胁迫的不同反应。此外,加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)强调,OsMAPK3是水稻应对热胁迫的一个新的核心基因。敲除OsMAPK3会损害水稻的耐热胁迫能力。这些结果为籼稻和粳稻品种根中热胁迫反应分子机制的差异提供了新的见解,为旨在培育耐热水稻品种的遗传改良和育种计划提供了有价值的靶点。

相似文献

1
Comparative transcriptomics of indica and japonica rice roots under heat stress reveals the crucial role of OsMAPK3 in heat response.热胁迫下籼稻和粳稻根系的比较转录组学揭示了OsMAPK3在热响应中的关键作用。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025 Apr;221:109668. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109668. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between rice cultivar "IR64" and cultivar "Koshihikari" at the seedling stage.水稻品种“IR64”和“越光”在苗期热胁迫响应机制差异的比较转录组分析
Front Genet. 2023 Apr 21;14:1135577. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1135577. eCollection 2023.
3
Anther Transcriptome Analysis of Two Heat Tolerance-Differentiated Indica Rice Restorer Lines Reveals the Importance of Non-Structural Carbohydrates and ATP in the Regulation of Heat Tolerance.两个耐热性有差异的籼稻恢复系花药转录组分析揭示了非结构性碳水化合物和ATP在耐热性调控中的重要性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 29;26(7):3161. doi: 10.3390/ijms26073161.
4
Global Transcriptome and Co-Expression Network Analysis Reveal Contrasting Response of and Rice Cultivar to γ Radiation.全球转录组和共表达网络分析揭示了 和 水稻品种对γ辐射的不同响应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 5;20(18):4358. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184358.
5
Genes, pathways and transcription factors involved in seedling stage chilling stress tolerance in indica rice through RNA-Seq analysis.通过 RNA-Seq 分析鉴定籼稻苗期耐冷胁迫相关的基因、途径和转录因子。
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1922-8.
6
Integrated RNA-Seq Analysis and Meta-QTLs Mapping Provide Insights into Cold Stress Response in Rice Seedling Roots.整合 RNA-Seq 分析和 Meta-QTLs 作图揭示水稻幼苗根系冷胁迫响应的机制
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jun 29;21(13):4615. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134615.
7
Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis During Anthesis Reveals New Insights into the Molecular Basis of Heat Stress Responses in Tolerant and Sensitive Rice Varieties.花期全基因组转录组分析揭示了耐热和敏感水稻品种热应激反应分子基础的新见解。
Plant Cell Physiol. 2016 Jan;57(1):57-68. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv174. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
8
Identification of differentially expressed genes under heat stress conditions in rice (Oryza sativa L.).鉴定水稻在热应激条件下差异表达的基因。
Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Mar;47(3):1935-1948. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05291-z. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
9
Comparative Transcriptomics of Rice Genotypes with Contrasting Responses to Nitrogen Stress Reveals Genes Influencing Nitrogen Uptake through the Regulation of Root Architecture.氮胁迫响应差异的水稻基因型比较转录组分析揭示了通过调控根系结构影响氮吸收的基因。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 11;21(16):5759. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165759.
10
Time-Series Transcriptomic Analysis of Contrasting Rice Materials under Heat Stress Reveals a Faster Response in the Tolerant Cultivar.热胁迫下不同水稻材料的时间序列转录组分析揭示了耐性品种的更快响应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 28;24(11):9408. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119408.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Functional Genomics for Exploring Abiotic Stress Tolerance Mechanisms in Cereals.探索谷物非生物胁迫耐受机制的功能基因组学进展
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;14(16):2459. doi: 10.3390/plants14162459.
2
Phenylpropanoids metabolism: recent insight into stress tolerance and plant development cues.苯丙烷类代谢:对胁迫耐受性和植物发育线索的最新见解。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 26;16:1571825. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1571825. eCollection 2025.