Cundy Thomas P, Thangaraj Evelyn, Rafii-Tari Hedyeh, Payne Christopher J, Azzie Georges, Sodergren Mikael H, Yang Guang-Zhong, Darzi Ara
The Hamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.10.015. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
Excessive or inappropriate tissue interaction force during laparoscopic surgery is a recognized contributor to surgical error, especially for robotic surgery. Measurement of force at the tool-tissue interface is, therefore, a clinically relevant skill assessment variable that may improve effectiveness of surgical simulation. Popular box trainer simulators lack the necessary technology to measure force. The aim of this study was to develop a force sensing unit that may be integrated easily with existing box trainer simulators and to (1) validate multiple force variables as objective measurements of laparoscopic skill, and (2) determine concurrent validity of a revised scoring metric.
A base plate unit sensitized to a force transducer was retrofitted to a box trainer. Participants of 3 different levels of operative experience performed 5 repetitions of a peg transfer and suture task. Multiple outcome variables of force were assessed as well as a revised scoring metric that incorporated a penalty for force error.
Mean, maximum, and overall magnitudes of force were significantly different among the 3 levels of experience, as well as force error. Experts were found to exert the least force and fastest task completion times, and vice versa for novices. Overall magnitude of force was the variable most correlated with experience level and task completion time. The revised scoring metric had similar predictive strength for experience level compared with the standard scoring metric.
Current box trainer simulators can be adapted for enhanced objective measurements of skill involving force sensing. These outcomes are significantly influenced by level of expertise and are relevant to operative safety in laparoscopic surgery. Conventional proficiency standards that focus predominantly on task completion time may be integrated with force-based outcomes to be more accurately reflective of skill quality.
腹腔镜手术期间过度或不适当的组织相互作用力是导致手术失误的一个公认因素,尤其是在机器人手术中。因此,测量工具与组织界面处的力是一项与临床相关的技能评估变量,可能会提高手术模拟的有效性。流行的箱式训练模拟器缺乏测量力的必要技术。本研究的目的是开发一种可轻松与现有箱式训练模拟器集成的力传感单元,并(1)验证多个力变量作为腹腔镜技能的客观测量指标,以及(2)确定修订后的评分指标的同时效度。
将一个对力传感器敏感的基板单元改装到箱式训练器上。3名不同手术经验水平的参与者对一个钉转移和缝合任务进行5次重复操作。评估了多个力的结果变量以及一个对力误差进行惩罚的修订评分指标。
在3个经验水平之间,力的平均值、最大值和总大小以及力误差均存在显著差异。发现专家施加的力最小且任务完成时间最快,新手则相反。力的总大小是与经验水平和任务完成时间最相关的变量。与标准评分指标相比,修订后的评分指标对经验水平具有相似的预测强度。
当前的箱式训练模拟器可进行改装,以增强对涉及力传感的技能的客观测量。这些结果受专业水平的显著影响,并且与腹腔镜手术的操作安全性相关。主要关注任务完成时间的传统熟练程度标准可与基于力的结果相结合,以更准确地反映技能质量。