回应荷兰工作成瘾量表中的老问题：秘鲁样本中的一种心理测量方法。

Responding to old problems in the Dutch work addiction scale: a psychometric approach in a Peruvian sample.

作者信息

Salas-Blas Edwin, Vallejos-Flores Miguel, Calderón-De la Cruz Gustavo, Manzanares-Medina Eduardo, Fonseca-Pedrero Eduardo, Mayo-Puchoc Nikol, Copez-Lonzoy Anthony

机构信息

Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Santiago de Surco, Peru.

Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima, Peru.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 22;13(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02437-1.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02437-1

PMID:39987134

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11847342/

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Harmful work patterns have become a public health problem. These conditions are worrying since they can have an impact on mental health, social conflicts, and physical difficulties due to their normalization of pathological behaviors related to work addiction.

AIMS

(1) determine the psychometric properties and reliability of the DUWAS and (2) evaluate valid comparisons at the construct level.

METHODS

The Spanish version of DUWAS was used. For the evaluation of the psychometric model, 446 Peruvian workers responded to the Spanish version (60.5% women aged 18 to 65, M = 35.1 SD = 12.45).

RESULTS

The unidimensional version was confirmed (x = 67.495; CFI = 0.96; TLI = 0.95; SRMR = 0.050 and RMSEA = 0.069). The reliability was acceptable (α = 0.735; 95% CI: 0.706 - 0.762; ω = 0.741; 95% CI: 0.712 - 0.767) and measurement invariance was confirmed for sex and age groups. Concurrent validity was mostly identified with mental health indicators.

CONCLUSION

This study provides new information on dimensionality and the realization of valid comparisons that allow its use in Spanish-speaking workers.

摘要

背景

有害的工作模式已成为一个公共卫生问题。这些情况令人担忧，因为它们可能会对心理健康、社会冲突以及身体状况产生影响，原因在于它们使与工作成瘾相关的病理行为常态化。

目的

（1）确定工作成瘾严重程度量表（DUWAS）的心理测量特性和信度，以及（2）在结构层面评估有效比较。

方法

使用DUWAS的西班牙语版本。为评估心理测量模型，446名秘鲁工人对该西班牙语版本进行了回应（60.5%为18至65岁女性，M = 35.1，标准差 = 12.45）。

结果

确认了单维版本（χ = 67.495；CFI = 0.96；TLI = 0.95；SRMR = 0.050，RMSEA = 0.069）。信度可接受（α = 0.735；95%置信区间：0.706 - 0.762；ω = 0.741；95%置信区间：0.712 - 0.767），并且确认了性别和年龄组的测量不变性。同时效度主要通过心理健康指标确定。