Suppr超能文献

巴西基于大麻二酚产品的评估:现行法规如何影响其标签质量?

Evaluation of cannabidiol-based products in Brazil: how can current regulations influence their labeling quality?

作者信息

Gallassi Andrea Donatti, de Oliveira André Wagner Carvalho, Mendes Nathália Silva, Filev Renato, Nakano Eduardo Yoshio

机构信息

Graduate Program in Health Sciences and Technology (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde (FCTS), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Centro Metropolitano 1, Conjunto A, Ceilândia Sul, ZIP 72220-900, Brasília-DF, Brasil.

Center of Drugs and Associated Vulnerabilities (Centro de Referência sobre Drogas e Vulnerabilidades Associadas), FCTS, UnB, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

J Cannabis Res. 2025 Feb 22;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00270-2.

Abstract

There is concern about the quality of cannabis-based products used in Brazil, mainly cannabidiol (CBD). This study aimed to evaluate the quality of labeling on CBD products marketed in Brazil authorized by two regulations - N660/2022 on imported products and N327/2019 on products with temporary trade permits - and whether there were differences between them concerning four domains: prescription, good manufacturing practices (GMP), laboratory tests, and safety of use. Determined labeling quality was based on a score of 45 criteria divided per domain and weights from 1 to 3 (according to the relevance for users' and prescribers' safety) built by public information provided by product manufacturers/representatives on websites and e-mail consultations. The quality score was classified as very satisfactory, satisfactory, or not very satisfactory, represented in median and interquartile range. Between the N327 and N660 products, the quality scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. All tests considered two-tailed hypotheses and a significance level of 5%. After applying the inclusion criteria, from 148 products selected, 105 were evaluated. Most of the evaluated CBD products were classified as satisfactory (47), followed by not very satisfactory (39) and very satisfactory (19). The N327 products presented information that was more accessible than the N660 products. Similarly, there was a significant difference between the two groups concerning the domains of prescription and safety of use; products in the N327 showed better results than those in the N660. This study contributes to the urgent debate on the quality of labeling and the risks of CBD widely marketed in Brazil.

摘要

巴西对基于大麻的产品质量存在担忧,主要是大麻二酚(CBD)。本研究旨在评估巴西市场上经两项法规授权的CBD产品的标签质量,这两项法规分别是关于进口产品的N660/2022和关于有临时贸易许可产品的N327/2019,并探讨它们在四个方面是否存在差异:处方、良好生产规范(GMP)、实验室检测和使用安全性。确定的标签质量基于45项标准的评分,这些标准按领域划分,权重从1到3(根据对用户和开处方者安全的相关性),由产品制造商/代表在网站上提供的公开信息和电子邮件咨询构建。质量得分被分类为非常满意、满意或不太满意,以中位数和四分位间距表示。在N327和N660产品之间,使用曼-惠特尼U检验比较质量得分。所有测试均考虑双侧假设和5%的显著性水平。应用纳入标准后,从选定的148种产品中,评估了105种。大多数评估的CBD产品被归类为满意(47种),其次是不太满意(39种)和非常满意(19种)。N327产品提供的信息比N660产品更容易获取。同样,两组在处方和使用安全性方面存在显著差异;N327组的产品比N660组的产品表现更好。本研究有助于就巴西广泛销售的CBD标签质量和风险展开紧急辩论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1d/11846405/a10ce720c1ef/42238_2025_270_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验